In the novel Monster and the Documentary Murder on a Sunday Morning the crime at hand was essentially robbery that ended in a death over it and those supposed criminals know stand trial. Even Though, the base of both stories is felony murder they are not identical cases. In the novel Mr. Nesbitt was the owner of a convenience store in Harlem. He was robbed by two assailants and by the end of it he was shot and killed for some money and cigarettes cartons. In the Documentary Mrs. Stephens was with her husband at a Bed and Breakfast on a sunday morning in Jacksonville. Her and her husband was robbed that morning by an unknown assailant who shot and killed Mrs. Stephens for her purse. Both crimes ended in a tragic death of either the owner of a store or owner of a purse. Steve Harmon, James King, Osvaldo Cruz and Richard Evans are on trial for felony murder where Steve harmon was arrested five months after the crime was committed around Christmas time in the novel. By the end of the trial Steve harmon was cleared of all charges, Richard Evans is still in jail and James King was charged . Similarly when Brenton Butler was on trial for felony murder and was arrested for this two hours after the fact as the documentary exclaims. He was the only suspect and was trialed for it but …show more content…
Nesbitt. Nesbitt pulled a gun and King took it from him and shot Nesbitt with his own gun. James was sentenced 25 to life. Presented in the documentary, after they released Butler from custody they didn't catch the guy who actually killed Mrs. Stephens till a year later. To get a reduced sentence one of the fellow inmates in his cell ratted on the killer in the same cell because he told them whole story of how he shot her because she called him a name as she was being robbed. The killer was sentenced to the Death Penalty. In a way they both confessed and brought to justice to the murders one directly and the other a little more
What enrages me is that a jury found Raymond Cormier not guilty in the death of Tina Fontaine. Apparently there was a lack of forensic evidence, yet he discussed the death of Tina in police recordings. He said "We had sex, she got angry... She found a knife, by sunset she was dead" Raymond also said "There are three rules in crime: deny, deny, deny. "
On June 17, 1966, a shooting occurred at the Lafayette Bar and Grill in Paterson, New Jersey. It was discovered that two men were responsible for the shooting causing a bartender and a customer killed, and two other customers critically injured. The two men who were responsible for this crime did not commit any robbery, rather they fired bullets. Upon arrival at the crime scene, police discovered bullet holes and saw the four victims. Rubin Carter and his new friend John Artis were both wrongfully convicted of murder because the motor vehicle they were driving was described to be similar to the murderers’ and they assumed it was theirs.
This persuaded the audience to lean more toward him being guilty. Anyone who watched the documentary can easily tell that a lot of research went into this. There were lots of detail that the directors included that really made it difficult to decide whether he is
There were many issues that arose during the O.J. Simpson murder case. The double murder took place in Los Angeles, California in 1994 and the criminal trial occurred in 1995. This was clear to be a double homicide. One of the victims was Nicole Brown Simpson, who was O.J. Simpsons ex-wife and since O.J. was a famous football player and coincidentally had prior accusations about domestic violence against Nicole, he became the main suspect. The other victim was Ron Goldman, who was Nicole’s friend, who was just bringing by a pair of sunglasses that her and her family left behind at the restaurant where Ron worked.
The novel Monster, by Walter Deann Myers, talks about the story of two young men put on trial for the murder of Alguinaldo Nesbitt. Twenty two year old James King and sixteen year old Steve Harmon are put on trial for the crime that ended Alguinaldo Nesbitt life. Alguinaldo Nesbitt was shot with his own gun while working at his own drugstore. Lorelle Henry testifies king was at the store the day of Mr. Nesbitt death, Bobo Evans testifies that King shot Mr. Nesbitt with a chrome, and lastly Osvaldo Cruz testifies that him and King planned and did this get over. On the other hand Dorothy Moore gives king an alibi.
In that case, the serial killer got their way and did whatever it took to get what they
James King is guilty because of the witness, Lorelle Henry’s testify. Sandra Petrocelli asks witness, Lorelle Henry, what had happened that day and what she overheard. Lorelle replies with, “The gentleman sitting at that table was one of the men arguing [points to King]” pg 164. Mrs. Henry- who had only gone to the store to get medicine for her sick granddaughter- had seen an argument between 2 men, one of them being identified as Mr.King, with the store owner. She left before anything got out of hand.
It took nine years for the jury to realize Bloodsworth was innocent. This shows our preamble has a flaw if people are sentencing other to jail even though they're innocent, causing the innocent to rot in jail wrongfully.
I made a mistake, or rather a terrible decision. I created a horrendous creature, no MONSTER, with an awful appearance that would horrify anybody and everybody. Not only did it give me nightmares and an illness, BUT IT WAS INESCAPABLE. IT WAS EVERYWHERE AND WOULD APPEAR AT ANY GIVEN MOMENT. Torturing me did not satisfy the monster’s needs, it made MY family another target.
Your Eloquence Engine Trial ends on 29 March 2018 - Subscribe to GradeProof Pro Monster Conflict Essay: Innocence vs. Guilt The definition of a “monster” is a threatening force. In Walter Dean Myers’ Monster, Steve Harmon the defendant in the trial is being charged for felony murder. The monster in him is the struggle between his innocence and guilt.
Innocent Until Proven Guilty Steve Harmon, the young teen and narrator in Monster was on trial for felony murder. This innocent sixteen year old was accused of being an accomplice in the robbery and death of Mr. Nesbitt. His supposed job was to be a look out for the criminals Bobo and King. Prior to them entering Mr. Nesbitts drugstore robbing and killing him in cold blood. Although there are some that doubt his innocence the verdict of Steve’s future was rightfully not guilty.
In today’s society, many people make bad decisions. In the novel, Monster by Walter Dean Myers, the narrator explains how one bad choice can lead to another. Steve Harmon, the narrator, was accused of being the lookout for a robbery which led to the murder of Mr. Nesbit and he goes on trial, debating whether he was an accessory to the murder. After reading the novel, one might think that Steve is not guilty because he didn’t kill Mr. Nesbitt and no witnesses saw him in the store. The jury has to decide if he was guilty for the murder, if he was guilty of being the lookout, and he even questions his innocence.
Two terrified children, scarred for life, greeted James in tears as he arrived at the crime scene. It was April 18th, 1980, and F.B.I. agent James Washington had been assigned to the case of a man who fled while out on bond, and then turned up dead in the middle of the woods. Unfortunately, those two children had been playing in the forest after a rough storm and stumbled upon the victim, Mr. Richard Strout. Agent Washington will not find the killer anywhere he would expect, however, for the real killer of Richard Strout was the legal system. Who was Richard Strout?
Murderer! Killer! DEATH! Steve Harmon and James King from Monster by Walter Dean Myers are being accused of the manslaughter of a drugstore owner. Steve Harmon, 16 years old, black is on trial for felony murder of a drugstore owner named Aguinaldo Nesbitt.
“I saw him hopping from one window to one window, that pallid face, the hollow eyes that made your heart shrinking, and the blood… the blood…,” Robert's breathed heavily under his beard, so close to Trey's head till he felt as if he could taste the real acid in the blood. “The blood… It’s dripping down his cheek as if it has been there long ago, and it can’t be wiped away.” He pointed the tip of the sharp knife to Trey's eyes, pushed it an inch closer and closer. “So you saw him too,” said Trey, panting hard, half relieved, half terrified.