Documentary 1
I was listening to a documentary on BBC world service and they were talking about the School to Prison Pipeline in the state of Texas. This has been a very interesting topic for me in class because it is insane that people can treat kids like criminals. In the documentary, they stated some interesting facts on how a child is seen as a criminal but they have the opportunity to get a clean slate but they have to appeal and pay more fines. School kid in the United States can end up in jail for acting up in class. Kids are being treated like criminals for non-violent crimes. These crimes can be minimal, like acting up in class, skipping school, or even talking back to a teacher. Some kids are given Class C misdemeanors it is a lower
…show more content…
“School system should not be giving kids/ making kids criminals because of a violation of the school rule” (BBC documentary) if kids had wrong colored shoes or wore the wrong shirt they would get in trouble. Each school year the school would spend $20 million on school security, they have police officers at their local school. Security and police are all intervening instead of the teachers or principle dealing with the problem. If they are detained at a very young age, then they are three times more likely to end up in prison when they get much …show more content…
Kids for cash was about two judges, President Judge Mark Ciavarella and Senior Judge Michael Conahan who incarcerated more than three thousand children to juvenile detention center/ camps, while they were receiving money/paybacks from private operation. Robert Mercile built two private detention centers for juveniles which were in cahoots with the two judges to send the children there.
Mark Ciavarella, elected for 10 years and after the election he was appointed Juvenile Court Judge. He was appointed judge four years after the Columbine tragedy in 1999. In which the “Zero Tolerance” was put into place by Judge Ciavarella, meaning he wouldn’t tolerate no drugs, no weapons, and no violence in school. The community praised and support him for trying to change the school to a better place. But instead he started incarcerating kids who had done minor offenses. For example, mocking a principle on MYSPACE, a student throwing a ball at another girl because the other girl waned to fight, an argument, a parent trying to teach their son minor lesson and cost their son, childhood in a detention center and later on in the years committing
Draft Paper In the documentary film, “Kids for Cash”, Robert May shows his audience the horrors of the Luzerne County justice system. He uses imagery, appeals to logos and pathos, personal experiences and anecdotes to support his claim. Robert May made this documentary to show the world that the government needs to make sure that even minors have a fair trial and justice before being incarcerated.
1. Being well known and respected is hard to come by today, with the quick judgments individuals make. Judge Dorn and Judge Ciavarella seemed to have an exception and were liked by many people. They were seen as hero’s to some, always correcting behavior and following a strict line. The public really liked the way they ran the system, always speaking publically to ensure safety and ease for kids who are lost.
The articles, “Their Best Way to Show Loyalty,” and “A Stolen Youth,” are about people getting evacuated by the Japanese army. Both articles have different points of views. For example, “The Best Way to Show Loyalty,” is an editorial published in 1943, so the main focus of this article is about how the Japanese were evacuated from their homes to temporary houses. Their internment was given by the government, they helped protect their properties, but their food and shelter will be given to them by the Federal Government. In my opinion, the internment in this article didn’t seem that bad due to having food and shelter with good conditions, others had it worse like in “A Stolen Youth,” with not having sanitary conditions.
However, varied structures of SRO programs and inconsistency in local record-keeping practices prevent reviews of the impact of every SRO program nationwide. However, national juvenile-crime and school-based crime statistics, as well as state statistics and studies of county and local SRO programs, show how dramatically SROs can reduce crime not only on school campus, but also in the community. Since SRO programs came to prominence in the early 2000s, the juvenile arrests declined 17% across-the-board between 2000–2009. The violent-crime fell 13%, and the property-crime fell 19% during this period. Other assaults, vandalism, weapons, drug, DUI, curfew, and loitering offenses all fell as well (pg.24 national
McCarter describes thoroughly the consequences STPP has on the nation’s school-age youth, including but not limited to increased exposure the criminal justice system, and gives solutions that schools can implement that will hopefully limit the overwhelming amount of students coming in contact with the STPP. The article proves that zero tolerance policies are not conducive to a safe school environment and does not foster a safe learning climate for
The literature review clearly has shown that there is a phenomenon called School to Prison, Schoolhouse to Jailhouse, or Public Education to Prison Pipeline. Therefore, Jeremy Thompson (2016) says, “Zero-tolerance policies in schools result in high suspension rates and expulsion rates among students in general, but disproportionately affect minority students, especially African-Americans because students who have been suspended or expelled are more likely than not to end up in the Criminal Justice
The book Burning Down the House: The End of Juvenile Prison, by Nell Bernstein is a compelling expose on the inherent evil of juvenile detention facilities. In her eye-opening account of the danger that lies within locking up this nation’s youth, Bernstein utilizes a plethora of rhetorical strategies to urge her audience to recognize and act on her claim. In writing this account on the heinousness of juvenile detention centers and why the system as a whole must be reformed, Bernstein uses personal cause and effect examples, studies and statistics, as well as concrete refutations to advocate the world for change. Bernstein starts her argument by providing readers with personal examples of the effects juvenile detention centers had on a handful of the kids she interviewed. Her first example briefly narrates how Jared, an adolescent many would
Children' brain are not fully developed yet. Thus, they do not realize the risks and consequences of their action. School-to-prison pipeline is arresting children for violating school rules. Statistic show drop out students are likely in jail for many reasons. Society need to focus more on education and spend less on prison, which can save thousands of taxpayers’ money.
The starting point for an accurate description of the issue can be shown by the fact that school now is more restrictive than most adults’ workplaces, which will not help foster the behaviors and personalities necessary to sustain any sort of flow in their future environments (Peter Gray, School is a Prison and Damaging Our Kids). The fact that children are being hindered rather than prepared for their futures is a definite issue. Another difficult matter is presented when one considers the fact that liberty is denied to children due to their age. Education is not only restrictive, but it is also legally mandatory with truancy being a crime punishable by law. This is accurately portrayed in a statement by Peter Gray in his article, “Seven Sins of Our System of Forced Education”, “In my system of values, and in that long endorsed by democratic thinkers, it is wrong to deny anyone liberty without just cause.
There are many similarities and differences between school and our prisons. I will start of with the differences in school. In school you get to go home. In school you also talk to the principal when in trouble. While in prison you talk to the warden.
There are many children who recommit the crime after they are released from juvenile detention, and the ones released from jail are less likely to the crimes they did before. If the children are tried in adult court they are more likely to be sentenced to periods of incarceration. If a child is tried in adult court or in criminal court depends on what the crime was and how old the person offending was. The children who commit serious that aren’t tried in criminal court often reoffend and end up back where they were
It remains to be seen if zero tolerance policies nationwide will be relaxed or replaced with a more lenient and rehabilitation-oriented approach; perhaps the recent "thaw" will lead into another freeze. Lawmakers and administrators should, however, keep in mind that a school system that has too much in common with jail may end up producing students who are all too ready to become
School Suspensions Suspension is a good punishment for misbehaving, but do they really want to be punished by not going to school for a couple of days? Suspensions are used to punish a student who has committed a minor crime in school. Usually kids are committing a “crime” because something has hurt them inside and they’re just trying to show what they’re feeling against the person that made them feel bad. So, are the students really responsible for their actions? Although school suspensions can be useful whenever a student misbehaves, the punishment can sometimes not even affect the student behavior against other students, limit students from learning new material and passing their grade, and could possibly affect their career life.
Have you ever wondered if your child 's education has anything to do with prison rates? Well they might actually have something to do with each other. Yearly the government spends almost triple on inmates than they do a child 's education. I think we should change and flip the roles so that children have a greater chance at a better life so less people will go to jail.
If they may be thought in jail they may get benefit for school.