Stepping outside, a person in the United States can instantly see how prevalent a role technology has in our lives. From the smart phones that connect people globally trough a few touches on the screen, to the airplanes roaring across the sky, the astounding capabilities and convenience that technology offers is unmatched. In “Why literature matters”, an article from the New York Times Corporation by Dana Gioia, Gioia explores how living in the high-tech 21st century has unfortunately deteriorated the percentage of Americans who read literature. Gioia is able to sway his audience to devote more time to the simple task of reading works of intellectual value through fearful diction and compelling consequences associated with being illiterate. Through his article, Gioia implements fearful diction to express his concern that America’s future is in the hands of those who are less informed and comprehending of situations; economic and social. By labeling the diminished percentage of those who read as “worrisome” and “troubling” Gioia is able to convey the negativity of the lack of literacy. Upon reading the article, and mulling over how Gioia feels about America’s current reading levels, a reader is inclined to acknowledge that illiteracy is detrimental to American society and something that needs …show more content…
By exposing the domino effect of illiteracy into other large aspects of American society such as electing leaders, and the business world, Gioia succeeds in alarming the audience to the seriousness of the issue and instilling a sense of urgency to mend the problem. Although the facts alone are eye-opening to any reader, by backing the facts up with big name organizations like “The National Association of Manufacturers” and the “National Conference of State Legislatures”, Gioia is able to cement his argument and therefore be more empowered in persuading his audience on the importance of
Many revel in spending their leisurely hours in front of a television screen, while some are content to glue their eyes to a laptop or computer, and others prefer to hover about with their cell phones, unable to be separated from them for even a minute. Even so, they are united by their dependence on technology. Similarly, in the novel Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, technology is a major aspect of characters' lives. In their society, reading is banned, while technology is encouraged to the point that the people consider their television as their real family. Although it is debatable whether technology is helpful or not, Fahrenheit 451 clearly demonstrates how technology has negative impacts on human behavior.
Dana Gioia creates a passage encouraging, influencing, and informing the reader of the recent literacy rate decline. He begins by verbalizing the problem, then moving to how it connects to business, then finally the decline affecting politics. Gioia uses evidence such as facts and quotes to support this idea and drive the thoughts into the reader’s head. These strategies, build his argument and assists with persuading the reader on how this decline will have a negative effect on society.
In this essay the author, Dana Gioia, discusses his opinion on the effect of a decline in reading. Gioia starts by introducing his topic and than giving his theme statement. Now we all know his purpose for the article. He begins his explanation by discussing the development of a young adults mind. The theme of reading being important to young adult’s, seems to flow through this piece.
In the passage the author Dana Gioia argues and states that the literacy rate here in the United States is dropping very fast. The author claims that “the interest young Americans showed in the arts and especially literature actually diminished. Gioia is stating that many young Americans throughout the United States are not reading and that is making the literacy rate to decrease. Making our literature status go down. Gioia gives us examples of this by stating some facts and looking back at a survey.
Everytime a phone, a laptop, an iPad is being used, is how much humanity depends on technology ever thought of? Or how many things are slowly being left behind because of it? It’s scary to think of what our lives could become if we continue down this path. Could our society become what authors like Ray Bradbury, George Orwell, and Kurt Vonnegut feared and warned us about in texts like Fahrenheit 451, 1984, Harrison Bergeron, and The Vedlt? These texts all in some way or another can be compared and contrasted thematically since they all develop a cautionary message about the overuse, abuse, and overwhelming presence of technology, mass media, and what our society could someday become.
According to the U.S Department Of Education, 32 million adults in the United States can’t read (Huffington Post). Illiteracy is a growing problem around the world, and is being passed on from generation to generation. This continuous cycle is affecting the lives of children tremendously, with statistics showing that 1 in 4 children in America grow up without learning how to read (Do Something). Me Talk Pretty by David Sedaris, The Human cost of an illiterate society by Jonathan Kozol, and The Lesson by Toni Cade Bambara show the consequences of being illiterate in various ways. Illiteracy negatively affects individuals every day life in today’s society.
Today you would most likely see people on electronics texting, watching videos, listening to music, or playing games, then reading a book. This book’s impact on me was more logical than emotional. I looked more towards the reasonings of the characters actions. It was surprising that people in this make-believe society were willing to die for books and they had a lot of courage.
Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 has sold more than 10 million copies since its original publication in 1953. Since then, Fahrenheit 451 has become a well-known classic for its thought provoking theme and unique interpretation of the world. Even though the story was written over sixty years ago, many of Bradbury’s predictions about the culture of the modern world came true. The story takes place in a country where books have been made illegal, and the majority of citizens spend most of their time engulfed in technology. It is typical for the people to have electronic devices in their ears and to spend a large portion of their income on entertainment rooms.
Students in today’s day and age are growing as being more fluent in digital as well as print cultures. New Literacies is a change in writing, and have forced individuals to rethink “what we mean by literature” (Lunsford 52). Students have gained a new way of reading, on in which is more tailored to the idea of new
These articles, magazines or newspapers do not help the reader become wealthier, politically known, or a better person. The author believes that reading irrelevantly
Showing the reader positives of reading in a factual way can be very persuasive. He then goes on to use strong and persuasive diction to support his claim, stating “The decline of literary reading foreshadows serious long-term social and economic problems, and it is time to bring literature and the other arts into discussions of public policy.” Using a slight guilt technique can persuade the reader. This strong diction continues to support his claim. And finally he ends his essay saying that the qualities gained from reading are not skills that “society can afford to
In the essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,” by Nicholas Carr, he explores the idea that new technology is changing the way we approach literature. Not only has the approach changed, but also the way we process the information, or at what length. Information is available and compact in today's society, this is changing our thinking; therefore our reading patterns has altered. We are becoming as the essay refers to as “Pancake people.” Society can be spread wide in the things they know, but are thin in the quantity of one specific area.
In this essay, "Why Literature Matters", author Dana Gioia sets up an argument about literature. Which she uses various ways to persuade her audience be in favor of her proposal; by showing statistic evidence, facts, and historical evidence, as well as some ironies, diction, and the appeals to reader's emotion. First of all, Gioia begins with strong appeals to reader's logos by clearly laying out the statistic source. For example, "According to the 2002 survey of Public Participation in the Arts, the reading population of the Americans is declining. " In turn, is an attempt to point out the thesis statement and make the readers to think out about this topic wile reading through her essay.
In the article, “Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia, he states that the decline of interest in literature—especially from young teens—will have a negative outcome in society. Notably, he informs the readers by utilizing strong vocabulary, as well as rhetorical appeals to persuade his audience that the decline in reading will have a negative outcome. This allows readers to comprehend his views and join his side of the argument. Gioia’s word choice assists in showing the magnitude of the text by stressing the meaning and importance of his argument.
As the digital age comes upon us, more and more Americans become dissatisfied with the state of literacy in this generation. Because the Internet paves the way for shorter and shorter interactions, namely articles versus novels and six-second viral videos versus films, many people that grew up in the age of the Internet have a preference for this condensed form of entertainment. Dana Gioia of The New York Times asserts in his essay “Why Literature Matters” that the decline of reading in America is destined to have a negative impact on society as a whole. Gioia opens his essay with a bittersweet account of which trend is occurring in the twenty-first century America arts scene. He notes that as college attendance rates blossom, the interest