The 1966 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was drafted in response to demands from leaders in the press and key individuals within Congress for greater access to government information in order to strengthen accountability in its personnel practices, domestic and foreign intelligence gathering efforts, foreign policy decisions, and other activities. The FOIA serves as a mechanism for the public?s right to know which in effect threatens the government?s right to protect state secrets and other privileged information. As a result, the process of implementing, interpreting, and applying the FOIA over time has been shaped by these competing interests. This article begins with a brief history of the origins of the act, followed by a description …show more content…
The FOIA functions as a decentralized system in which individual requests for information are made to the agency that an individual or group believes is likely to have the record(s) in question. These requests are then processed by that agency. Federal agencies provide their own guidelines for FOIA requests, often as part of comprehensive web pages dedicated to the FOIA with information about the requested records and other related information. Individual agencies are responsible for responding to requests within the established timeline of 20 days, with 10-day or longer extensions allowable in cases where the agency faces a burden due to the need for additional research or lack of adequate resources for an overstretched agency. They are also responsible for issuing requested information or denying requests as well as being accountable for appeals of denied requests in federal courts. Agencies also list their FOIA contacts through the Justice Department though they maintain their own individual staff dedicated to FOIA requests. The Department of Justice administers the FOIA and their Office of Information Policy monitors agency activity to ensure compliance. To aid in this process, they provide summaries and access to information about court cases addressing the FOIA, run workshops for interested parties such as attorneys, post frequent updates on their ?OIPGuidance? website,[8] and publish a full-length ?DOJ Guide to the Freedom of Information Act,?[9] the …show more content…
The FOIA can be viewed as a successful tool for civil society by viewing the change in the frequency of requests over time.[11] In 1990, there were a total of 491,000 requests filed, with the Defense Department receiving the highest number at 118,000.[11] By 2012, there were a total of 651,254 filed requests, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) receiving the highest number at 190,589.[12] However, when comparing the rate of backlogged requests remaining at the end of a year compared to the number of total requests received in the same year, DHS comes in at only 14.98% compared to the Department of State at 56.5% with 10,464 backlogged requests, and the National Archives and Records Administration at 57% with 7610 backlogged requests at the end of 2012. This is in contrast with agencies such as the Department of Agriculture, which reported 741 backlogged requests at 3.34% of its total annual requests for the same
George Washington refused to share documents related to a military expedition against Native Americans. Congress had demanded White House records and testimony from his staff. Washington met with his Cabinet and together they agreed the president had the authority to refuse Congress — in the public interest. So began the use of executive privilege. Every president, in some form, has invoked executive privilege.
CS 4001 Reading Quiz 1 1. Logos means the message itself or the clarity of the argument. Ethos means the writer or speaker of the message and how his or her personality affects the expression of the message. Pathos means the audiences of the message and what their assumptions or beliefs are. Paying attention to pathos will enable the writer to set up sounding arguments.
How 1984 handles their citizens, who go against the Party and how The United States government handle such situation is vastly different, but there are similarities in the ideas and the outcome. One of the past directors of the CIA, William E. Colby felt that the public had the public needed to know what the CIA had done to cover up scandals and spoke about his interactions with Congress. Colby was an active member of the CIA after World War II, and during the Vietnam War, he became the Director of the CIA. Colby was quick to adopt a policy of openness about U.S. intelligence activities to different committees within the government itself, and also, to the citizens of the United States. While Colby revealed the importance of the tasks done
Prior to the Patriot act a search warrant was needed, after the Patriot Act a search warrant is no longer required for agents to employ surveillance “…when looking into the full range of terrorism-related crimes,” (Dept. of Justice). The Patriot Act allows federal officials to gather information for suspected terrorist activity without needing to have evidence. In addition to this, Howard Ball observed that in the seventh title of the Patriot Act information is able to be shared between federal, state, and local law enforcement (52). Banks and Tauber analyzed federal district court decisions on cases regarding the Patriot act and they found, “[T]hey [district courts] are not inclined to protect civil rights and liberties during times of domestic or international conflict.” They continue to note that judicial ideology does not affect the outcomes of these cases, that civil-libertarian interest groups make a deferential decision less likely, and that if a more conservative Senate and president are in power a deferential decision is more
1. The Patriot Act (Title II, Sec. 213) allows for the delayed notification of the execution of a search warrant. Under what circumstances can the notification be delayed? The Patriot Act upholds a standard for the protection of privacy while performing search and seizure actions under the emphases that a physical warrant document is issued to the person that the search is performed on.
After that the press was told that the government was tracking the activities of prominent American citizens who had voiced criticisms of the war effort and other
The second case I chose to research was the United States v. Nixon case in 1974. I saw someone else post about this one already and it grabbed my attention. After the Watergate scandal, President Nixon was ordered to release specific tapes and papers related to meetings between him and those indicted by the grand jury. Nixon claimed executive privilege protected communications between high government officials and those who advise and assist them. and did not turn over all communications.
Such as our social media, files, pictures, or videos. Though this information should be used with a good cause on a federal level. The state, and local government should not be able to obtain this right to withhold over their citizens. For this can cause an increased amount of monitoring it's citizens giving them access to our public, and private life. Our private information should only be used for the security of our country.
In the book, 63 Documents The Government Doesn’t Want You To Read, it explains how the government keeps so much information from us, the American people. The book is a great one for the American people at whole and should be used to open the minds of the Americans. It describes actual incriminating documents the government tries to hide from Americans. As well as programs that show how un- American government officials really are.
The personal liberties of Americans is what gives meaning to being an American. These liberties should be respected and upheld to the greatest efforts possible and should not be abridged by no means less than do process as exemplified by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the American Constitution. However, over time, we have learned about legislation that has been enacted by our government with said efforts to protect the nation. Hence, the Espionage and Sedition Acts, the confinement of Japanese-Americans during the Second World War, the Red Scare post-WWII, and the Pentagon Papers of 1971 are all examples that depict some of the behaviors performed by the federal government that would appear to infringe on these liberties.
During times of war, there is a national crisis to protect the country and the citizens living in it. Secrecy of military endeavors is of utmost importance, and disclosing facts about these topics could lose a war or risk millions of lives. The government takes away people 's rights in order to protect the country. Many people argue against the suspension of the writ of Habeas Corpus, and the Espionage and Sedition acts.
The “Nothing-to-Hide Argument” Analyzed: In this rhetorical analysis, I will be taking a look at Daniel J. Solove’s essay “The Nothing-to-Hide Argument,” which is about privacy in the context of personal information and government data collection (Solove 734). Solove’s main argument in his essay is that the general public has a narrow perception of what privacy really is. The purpose behind his main argument is to expose the problems with the nothing-to-hide argument while presenting a way to challenge it for his target audience, government officials. Solove’s argument to his target audience is effective through his exemplary use of substance, organization, and style in his essay.
This completely takes away a person’s right to privacy. The government has access search anyone’s internet or library records. Taking away someone’s right to read what they please also takes away the freedom of writing about controversial topics since anyone who reads it is intimidated by the government (Jacobs and
“The Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 transformed the Legislative Reference Service into the Congressional Research Service (CRS). It also directed CRS to devote more of its efforts and increased resources to doing research and analysis that assists Congress in direct support of the legislative process.” The Congressional Budget Office in addition to the Government Accountability Office oversees the budget for the CRS. The purpose of the CRS is to provide Congress with assistance in researching and analyzing issues of national interest that the United States is faced with. One of the disadvantages for the CRS is that the guidance they sometimes provide to our Congressional leaders is sometimes too vague.
Many people in the company need access to data to help them do their job better. The main questions revolve around who needs what data, and who chooses what data gets to be shared. Looking at all the pieces, as well as the IT and information assets, the governance of the data belongs to a data owner (Khatri & Brown, 2010). The main questions to be answered must include who is the data owner? Who is responsible for data quality?