In February of 1943 Martin Dies presented a report from the Dies committee, listing William Pickens as a person of interest for “being a member or sponsor of certain organizations which are purported to be Un-American”(Pt.4 1). Pickens, an author, orator, educator, and civil rights leader, was interviewed later that year by special agents of the FBI. The FBI asks Pickens questions about several organizations he may have been involved with over his years. Picken’s responses range from defending his involvement, to completely denying involvement with certain organizations. The FBI’s command of information relating to Picken's life, and Picken’s claimed difficulty remembering, remind us of the imperfection of memory and the sheer information advantage …show more content…
Jordan asks Mr. Pickens about several events that Mr. Pickens had clearly not assigned much importance. Yet during this interview Mr.Pickens does not get to decide which interactions in his life are meaningful. Mr. Pickens has to think back to a petition that he signed three years ago and only had a faint memory of. In another case, Pickens is listed as a sponsor for another organization that he remembers nothing about. When asked about being a guest of honor at another event, Pickens admits that he,“Cannot say ‘yes’ or ‘no’” and he states, “I go to so many things”(Pt.1 4). Mr. Pickens was only there to hear what the government thought was notable about his past actions. The FBI even tells Mr.Pickens he is listed as the Vice-chairman of the publication “Fight”, while Mr. Pickens states he has never even read the publication. Pickens was made more suspicious in the eyes of the government by an association he did not even know he had. While Pickens cannot be bothered to remember certain parts of his past, he is matched against the FBI, which keeps track of anything they find worthy of remembering. The FBI seems to remember more about Pickens interactions and action than Pickens himself remembers. When Pickens is corrected about aspects of his own past, it does start to make him look more suspicious, regardless of his actual innocence or …show more content…
The FBI’s extensive knowledge on every organization, paired with the Dies committee's focus on communism, meant Pickens was left to defend his motives and intentions to a suspicious entity that simply knew more about the organizations than Pickens ever did. When asked about potentially helping to stop arms shipments to Europe with the American League Against War and Fascism, Pickens states, “All I was interested in was to get charity money for these people” (Pt.1 5) In a similar vein, when asked about the NAACP, Pickens claims, “I worked with them for over thirty years, but only for the advancement of the colored people”(Pt.1 6). Pickens preemptively defended himself from what he knew was a question rooted in the government's concern over the NAACP’s relationship with the Communist Party. Pickens either did not know that communists were involved in certain organizations he had interacted with, or was concerned with non-political aspects of the group. However, the FBI knew more about members and was certainly concerned with political aspects of these groups. When questioned about the Civil Liberties Union, Pickens states, “Politics did not enter it. I never pretended to be a communist. They knew it”(Pt.1 4). Whether Pickens was truly uninterested in communist aspects, or if he was trying to hide his true reasons for being in these groups, his task was made harder thanks to the
The case of Mapp vs. Ohio is a case of illegal search and seizure. It went to the Supreme Court in 1961. It is important to today’s society because it might mean the difference between guilty and innocent. I agree with the Supreme Court because it is illegal to access private property without a warrant or consent. The case lasted until June 19, 1961.
The assassination of former president John F. Kennedy was a tragic event that left citizens across the United States in grief, shock, and disbelief. The tragedy became the subject of controversy as speculations of a political conspiracy involving the CIA, the Mafia, or the Soviet Union surround the assassination. Some people began to distrust and criticize the Warren Commission’s report of the investigation of events regarding Kennedy’s death. Some conspiracy theorists assert that the assassination was not the act of a lone gunman as reported, and they cite evidence in the theories of the “magic bullet” and the grassy knoll. Fred Kaplan, a journalist, refutes these prominent conspiracy theories in his article “Killing Conspiracy.”
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974) Justice Lewis F. Powell for the majority (5-4) FACTS: In 1968, Chicago police officer Robert Nuccio was convicted of murder in the death of Ronald Nelson. The Nelson family retained Elmer Gertz to represent them in a civil action against Nuccio. In a magazine owned by Welch, called American Opinion, the John Birch Society published an article alleging Nuccio 's trial was part of a Communist campaign against police. The article further implied Gertz had a criminal record and labeled him a "Leninist" and "Communist-fronter." Gertz filed a libel suit, claiming the statements were false and injured his reputation.
Andrew Davis September 27, 2016 Forensics Mr. Malgeri Ronald Cotton Case Ronald Cotton was sentenced to jail in 1995, after serving ten years for a crime he didn’t even commit. Eye witnesses are considered to be the best form of evidence in an unsolved case. Mr. Cotton was convicted primarily by an eyewitness named Jennifer Thomson-Cannino, who was sure she identified the right male. Years go by and the case was re-ruled and the jury ruled Jennifer 's description as a misidentification.
Directly after the end of World War II, the United States faced a time like no other—the Cold War. The fear of communism and the totalitarian Soviet Union grew rampant, and the possibility of an impending all-out nuclear war gripped American minds. During this time, the fear of a breach in national security heightened, and a loyalty review program in the government was introduced by President Truman. Soon, this practice crept into society, as everyday citizens undertook the responsibility of “policing” each other—determining each other’s loyalty, with suspicion constantly clouding one’s mind. Amidst this, American historian Henry Steele Commager, a product of the University of Chicago “…where he received his Ph.B. and M.A. in philosophy…and returned for his Ph.D.” ("Commager, Henry Steele”), stepped onto the scene to dispute the anti-communist crusade he noticed was running rampant in his nation.
In his book, Killing Lincoln: The Shocking Assassination That Changed America Forever, Bill O’Reilly attempts to explore, in depth, the events leading up to and immediately after the assassination of President Lincoln. As a Television show host, questions arise as to O’Reilly’s qualifications to write such a book. To make up for the insight that he might lack, O’Reilly co-authors the book with Martin Dugard who, having written numerous non-fiction books prior to this one including The Last Voyage of Columbus and Into Africa: The Epic Adventures of Stanley & Livingstone, gives the book the qualifications it needs to be credible. In Part One, O’Reilly chronicles the final days of the Civil War as well as Lincoln and Boothe’s movements as the
Robespierre led the French Revolution known as “The Reign of Terror”. The new government would execute large numbers of individuals whom they believed to be enemies of the revolution. So, the Reign of Terror was unjustified, for it not only violated the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen in multiple cases, specifically articles two and ten, but also caused the death of thousands. Although the Committee of Public Safety had good intentions, it ended up doing more harm than good as they invaded people’s lives and disregarded their rights as human beings.
Jim Crow was not a person, it was a series of laws that imposed legal segregation between white Americans and African Americans in the American South. It promoting the status “Separate but Equal”, but for the African American community that was not the case. African Americans were continuously ridiculed, and were treated as inferiors. Although slavery was abolished in 1865, the legal segregation of white Americans and African Americans was still a continuing controversial subject and was extended for almost a hundred years (abolished in 1964). Remembering Jim Crow: African Americans Tell About Life in the Segregated South is a series of primary accounts of real people who experienced this era first-hand and was edited by William H.Chafe, Raymond
Project Report: Oral History and the History of the Civil Rights Movement - Kim Lacy Rogers, The Journal of American History, Vol. 75, No. 2 (1988), pp. 567-576 The civil rights movement of the early 1960s was one of the most significant events in the modern history of the United States, one that has elicited much examination and research by historians. An era that saw the power and influence of the movement play an integral role in the eradication of legalised segregation and the disenfranchisement of African Americans. Given the historic importance of the civil rights movement, this paper aims to examine Dr Kim Lacy Rogers ‘Oral History and the History of the Civil Rights Movement’, published in the Journal of American History in 1988.
A serial killer is defined as “an individual who kills more than three people in succession without a cooling off period”. From the beginning of recorded history to the present day, humankind has seen its share of serial killers from Giles De Rais to Jack the Ripper, murder is not a new concept. However in 2006 a new name was added to the ongoing list of serial killers, Robert Pickton, aged 58, plead not guilty to 27 charges of first degree murder. During the course of his trial, a lengthy delay, an error in the charge and an appeal to Supreme Court of Canada are elements which make the Pickton case an unprecedented case in Canadian history.
Many historians, researchers, politicians, and scholars have considered reconstruction as turning point for the ratification of equality laws that would eliminate racial segregation for equally rights. However, a close follow-up of the controversial developments that occurred immediately after the end of the Civil War in 1865 indicates dissimilarity. The reconstruction era might have made a history of enabling African Americans to vote and become state legislatures, but some major political personnel consider Reconstruction as a failure, which led to non-ending political controversies, murder, and assaults indicating general failure. Robert Smalls and Wade Hampton are some of the major political people who participated in the continuity of the Reconstruction era and their actions and words prove its failure, as explored in this study. However, their consideration of black freedom contrast because Smalls demonstrates the harmful actions of
At this point he is having troubles deciding who is at fault. With the failure to examine every little detail, it seems he committed the crime. He doesn’t want to bring out important details because it could cause him to get into
While standing in front of a judge Appleton state “But it occurs to me that there’s a bigger issue here today than whether I’m a Communist… Fact is, I’ve never been a man of great conviction. I never saw the percentage in it and quite frankly I suppose… lack of courage” It came to him that he wasn’t only representing himself, he was representing Luke Trimble and everyone in the town of Lawson. “You know I think he’d probably tell you the America represented in this room is not the America he died defending. I think he’d tell you your America is bitter and cruel and small. I know for a fact that his America was big, bigger than you can imagine with a wide open heart where every person has a voice even if you don’t like what they have to say.”
Julia Modine Ms. Hoag U.S. History I 12 December 2017 Hiram Wesley Evans effect on America Much of mainstream white, protestant America was ripe for the emergence of a persuasive and unifying cultural ideology in the 1920s that catered to its fears, prejudices and misguided beliefs. The Ku Klux Klan had been around for decades and had always held up the ideal of the original American pioneer stock and their descendents as the true recipients of the American promise. In the mid-20s, the Ku Klux Klan underwent a resurgence in popularity amid growing alarm within a large percentage of middle and working class white men due to increased volume of immigrants competing in the workplace, growing religious sects and racial integration.
He said that at least 205 members of the State Department were members of the communist party. This was after it was released to the public that a couple named Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were secretly communist spies who were staying in the U.S., stealing nuclear weapon secrets. With McCarthy’s remarks such as “They [a communist spy] could even be your neighbor!’ scarring the American public’s mind, many were on edge.