Michael, you are right when you state the purpose of the document was to stop the South from successfully seceding. Lincoln knew that if the Union was going to when the war the Union needed to get more supporters, especially soldiers. The Emancipation Proclamation did exactly that. The African Americans were exhilarated to be free; therefore, they were willing to fight for the Union cause. Although the document was not very effective, the Emancipation Proclamation did start the wheels to turn towards abolishing slavery.
There is some debate on whether or not the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 truly freed the slaves of the south. There is evidence proving that the proclamation in fact did not actually emancipate slaves like it should have according to the document. Full emancipation did not come until after the end of the Civil War. Lincoln used the Emancipation Proclamation as a war tactic against the south. And although it claims to free the slaves immediately, Lincoln did not have that kind of power over the south.
In this specific Proclamation, it was NOT at all for slavery, it was a war measure. “In a letter to his Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase, he admitted that the original proclamation had no legal justification, except as a military measure.” (37). It was also a way to continue trade with the Europeans because of their recent decision in abolishing slavery. The Europeans would not agree with Lincoln’s real agenda, being to continue slavery, so he used the Emancipation for that purpose as well.
Allen Guelzo and Vincent Harding approached Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation and the eventual abolition of slavery from two very different viewpoints. The major disagreement between them is whether the slaves freed themselves, or Abraham Lincoln and his Emancipation Proclamation freed them. Harding argued the former view, Guelzo took the later. When these essays are compared side by side Guelzo’s is stronger because, unlike Harding, he was able to keep his own views of American race relations out of the essay and presented an argument that was based on more than emotion. Allen Guelzo
In the Emancipation Proclamation he says, “all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a state, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free,” (Emancipation Proclamation, January 1st, 1863) . His motive to free slaves from slave states is because then they are able to fight in the war with the Union one freed. Lincoln states in the Emancipation Proclamation, “such persons of suitable condition, will be received into the armed service of the United States,” (Emancipation Proclamation, January 1st, 1863) . The reason for the Emancipation Proclamation, to Lincoln, was to get more people to join the Union in their fight in order to win the war. Global Americans says, “186,000 African Americans served in the Union army and another 20,000 in the navy,” (Montoya, et al., 381) .
Many african american had to fight for their right to defend their country and to receive fair and equal treatment in the military. The legacy of their courageous struggles and their service helped the united states to realize its highest ideal of freedom. the civil war,they had the worst jobs and the worst weapons. They also did not having the right to vote or to have an education, according to the article “ civil war black soldiers” the confederate declared that all african american fighting for the union should be treated as rebels and slaves and they would be put to death if they were caught by a confederate.
Lincoln’s message was delivered amidst the Civil War, therefore, it was imperative as to not anger the American public. Despite the expansive wording of the proclamation, it was in some ways very limited more so by the fact that the proclamation only applied to “states in rebellion against the United States.” Excluded were the border states between the Confederacy and the Union, as well as any territories taken from the C.S.A. Such was the case in Virginia, to which the proclamation would apply to, but excluded West Virginia who seceded from Virginia shortly after succeeding from the Union. Although providing many exceptions, the proclamation was concise and pleased everyone by addressing the problem at hand – slavery. With the delivery of the proclamation, the issue of slavery still remained unresolved long after the war had concluded.
This document, written by Lincoln, freed all the slaves of the southern states of “rebellion”. This did a few things. It inspired the people of the North to fight harder to end slavery, improving war support among citizens. It also motivated the Confederates to fight harder, because they knew their economy would drop without the institution of slavery. Lastly, it didn’t free the slaves in the border states,
“In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free.” - President Abraham Lincoln Contrary to popular belief, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free every slave. Thus, the Thirteenth Amendment was necessary to accomplish true emancipation. The President’s edict in 1863 only freed the slaves living in rebellious states. Slavery continued to exist in five states and several other counties and parishes for strategic military purposes.
Even though this document did not fully guarantee freedom for the slaves in the North, it was a start at ending slavery. It also had an unintended consequence; it created a bigger divide in the country, over whether slaves should be free or
“As president, Lincoln could issue no such declaration; as commander in chief of the armies and navies of the United States he could issue directions only as to the territory within his lines; but the Emancipation Proclamation applied only to territory outside of his lines,”This quote shows how Lincoln could not issue a declaration like that because of his position as Commander in Chief he could only do so much of the armies and navies of the U.S. “The Emancipation Proclamation did more than lift the war to the level of a crusade for human freedom. It brought some substantial practical results, because it allowed the Union to recruit Black soldiers,” It helped people of color get out of slavery but they did have to help fight in the civil war. “Emancipation would redefine the Civil War, turning it from a struggle to preserve the Union to one focused on ending slavery, and set a decisive course for how the nation would be reshaped after that historic conflict,” The Civil War helped end slavery and it also helped decide what our nation today would turn out like in the future. The Emancipation Proclamation that Lincoln created only freed so many slaves in the long run but did help out to end
The Emancipation Proclamation The Civil War (1861-1865) ended in a victory for the Union, however, such a victory was made possible by the Emancipation Proclamation. Abraham Lincoln’s issuing of the Emancipation Proclamation paved the way to a Union victory in the Civil War by shifting the focus of the war from solely the restoration of a strong Union to the emancipation of slaves as well. This shift in the reason for and the meaning of the Civil War was the main factor that ultimately led to the Union victory due to the implications the Emancipation Proclamation had on foreign involvement in the war and the southern economy.
In 1863, President Lincoln had the Emancipation Proclamation declaring “all persons held as slaves within any States, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free.” However, the Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery in the nation it was more of a freedom for a slave where slavery was free emotionally but not physically. Many slaves knew they were free but their owner convinced them to continue working out of loyalty and because they had nowhere to go. Some slaves didn’t believe they were free and they believed that if they left their owner that their safety wasn’t guaranteed. The proclamation didn’t free all slaves
The Emancipation Proclamation opposed discrimination. It allowed black slaves to serve in the army and get other jobs, or continue to work on plantations, as employees making money. The Proclamation didn't affect slaves in southern areas already under Union control. The Emancipation Proclamation helped destroy the issue of slavery. Slavery was completely crushed with the 13TH amendment.
Somebody once remarked, “No man is good enough to govern another man without the other's consent” (“Abraham Lincoln Quotes"). At the initial view, the Civil War was going to be won by the South. Nonetheless, all that changed when Abraham Lincoln constructed the Emancipation Proclamation because it did not solely free slaves, it further altered antiquity for the salutary and assisted the North in the war, which led to their triumph. The Emancipation Proclamation was Abraham Lincoln’s greatest achievement as president.
On September 2nd, 1862, Abraham Lincoln famously signed the Emancipation Proclamation. After that, there’s been much debate on whether Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation truly played a role in freeing the slaves with many arguments opposing or favoring this issue. In Vincent Harding’s essay, The Blood-red Ironies of God, Harding argues in his thesis that Lincoln did not help to emancipate the slaves but that rather the slaves “self-emancipated” themselves through the war. On the opposition, Allen C Guelzo ’s essay, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America, argues in favor of the Emancipation Proclamation and Guelzo acknowledges Lincoln for the abolishment of slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation.