The Great Compromise represented the interest of those who wanted a strong national government and those who wanted states to have a strong voice by establishing a two-house Congress. History Alive, pg. 152 states, “The second house, the Senate, would represent the states. Each state would have two senators, to be elected by their state legislatures.” The Senate represented those who wanted a strong national government-the smaller states- because since their population was tiny compared to the massive population of the larger states, the Senate will make sure that all the states have an equal say in Congress. No large states could crush any small states because all the states have an equal say so everything was fair. According to History Alive, …show more content…
“By the time of the convention, nine-tenths of the slaves in the United States lived in the South,” (History Alive, pg153.). The Three-Fifths Compromise allowed the enormous number of slaves in the south to partially count when determining a state’s population, increasing the population for states in the south and giving them more representatives in the House of Representatives then they would’ve without the counting of slaves. The southern states gained more representatives as a result of the increase in population, giving them more power in the House of Representatives. According to History Alive, pg.153, “Delegates from the North challenged this idea. Were slaves to be considered people with a right to be represented in Congress? Or were they property?” The Three-Fifths Compromise gave slaves representation in the south but the southern states did not gain a massive amount of representatives in the House of Representatives because slaves did not count as one full person. The northern states gained a small amount of representatives from the Three-Fifths Compromise but the compromise also restrained the southern states from gaining too many representatives. Therefore, the southern and northern states were represented by the Three-Fifths Compromise where slaves were counted as three-fifths of a
Furthermore, each state had very different needs that made it very difficult to agree on a resolution that would represent all of the states. For example, in Pennsylvania slavery was not an important factor in supporting their commercial and manufacturing economy. Secondly, prominent representatives such as Benjamin Franklin did not believe in the practice; however, in other states such as Georgia, slavery was an important resource for their economy because it allowed them to produce cash crops such as tobacco without paying for labor while supporting their economy. Even though this was just one of the many resolutions that we discussed during the simulated convention, the discussion on slavery further represented the shift from powers that each individual states had to the development of the new federal government. Some states took pride in the fact that they were able to control their economy also making it hard to reach a compromise that would resolve the
all states were represented equally in the Senate. This made the smaller states happy. In the House of Representatives, representation was based on population. This pleased the bigger states. The Great Compromise settled the method of representation in the legislative branch.
Southern states battled for slaves to be checked as far as portrayal. The bargain between the two wound up plainly known as the three-fifths trade off on the grounds that each five slaves would be included as three people terms of portrayal. Commerce Compromise, The bargain commanded that duties were just to be permitted on imports from outside nations and not sends out from the U.S. This trade off likewise directed that interstate business would be managed by the government. It additionally required that all trade enactment be passed by a 66% larger part in the Senate, which was a win for the South since it countered the energy of the more crowded Northern states.
New powers were granted to Congress to regulate the economy, currency, and the national defense, but provisions which would give the national government a veto power over new state laws was rejected. At the insistence of delegates from southern states, Congress was denied the power to limit the slave trade for a minimum of twenty years and slaves--although denied the vote and not recognized as citizens by those states--were allowed to be counted as 3/5 persons for the purpose of apportioning representatives and determining electoral votes. Most importantly, perhaps, delegates compromised on the thorny issue of apportioning members of Congress, an issue that had bitterly divided the larger and smaller states. Under a plan put forward by delegate Roger Sherman of Connecticut ("the Connecticut Compromise"), representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population while each state would be guaranteed an equal two senators in the new
During the early years of America, agricultural demands drove most of the economy allowing the South to demanded political protection. One of the protective measures was the Three-Fifths Compromise in 1787. The South wanted to count the slaves toward its population allowing for more representation. At the Constitutional Convention, the delegates decided to count a slave as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of determining the population for how many seats each State would have in the House. This solidified Southern control over Politics for several years to come.
The 3/5ths compromise The smaller states wanted more representation in the house but the north argued that if blacks weren 't allowed to vote and didn 't have rights they shouldn 't be counted towards house seats. The compromise stated that every slave counted as 3/5ths of a person towards house
For example, the three-fifths cause of the Constitution had increased their power in Congress and the electoral college to gain control of the polices of the major parties on slavery. As a result, the Slaver Power consolidated their domination through the purchase of Louisiana and Florida without prohibition of slavery and the passages of the Missouri Compromise that allowed slavery to cross the Mississippi River, the annexation of Texas and the compromise measure of 1850. Observing the dominance of the Slave Power, the Republicans were deeply concerned the fact that Slave Power dominated the government and was using it to extend the peculiar institution and impose a new and alien interpretation of the Constitution on the American people. [3] Furthermore, the Slave Power provided the connection between the Republican view of the south as an alien society and their belief to unify as a political organization to confine the southern influence.
The Virginia Plan was considered unfair to the small states and the New Jersey plan was considered unfair to the large states. Soon after, Roger Sherman from Connecticut wrote “The Great Compromise.” Many
“The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.
The plan proposed by Virginia otherwise known as the “large-state plan.” Which proposed “a bicameral legislature, in which the lower house would be elected proportionately and the upper house would be selected from a list of nominees sent from the state legislatures on the basis of equal representation for the states. ”(add footnote) As the smaller states feared that this plan would lose a voice in the federal government if they continued with the Virginia plan, they opposed this plan and came up with one for themselves which would be known as the “small-state plan.” The small-state plan would propose “a unicameral Congress, with equal representation for each state, with all the powers of the Confederation Congress.
This decision angered both northerners and southerners. The North was upset due to the decision, which declared that black Americans didn’t count as citizens, which made no effort in the abolition of slavery. The South’s issue was that the majority of their state population was African American, and would give them less representatives if they did not count as citizens, or people in general. This affected the election of Abraham Lincoln, which led to the South’s succession and the start of the
After no progress of which plan to go through with, Roger Sherman came up with the Great Compromise. The compromise called for two house legislator. Members of the house of representatives or the lower house would be elected by popular vote. Members of the Senate or the upper house would be chosen by the state legislators. Each state would only have two senators no matter the size, or population of the state.
It allowed all male slaves to count as three-fifths of a person when counting population and would greatly increase the representation and political power of slave-owning states. In 1808, United States outlaws American participation in the African Slave Trade. The Compromise of 1850 includes a controversial Fugitive Slave Law that compels all citizens to help in the recovery of fugitive slaves. The Civil War outbreaks in 1861 due to slavery and Lincoln’s
At this time, slaves were not counted as anything for taxes or population. The South proposes that their slaves should be counted as part of their total population. Northerners object to this, obviously, because they wanted to continue having more representation and voice than the South. The Constitutional Convention decided upon the Three-Fifths Compromise. This compromise stated that every five slaves would count for three people.
The upper house would be elected by the lower house, thus ensuring that there is always at least one representative in the upper house. The New Jersey Plan preserved an existing unicameral legislature, in which each state would have equal representation. The compromise that was made called for a bicameral legislature, like the 1 Virginia Plan. However, the lower house number of representatives was determined by the size of the state, and the upper house each state had equal representation. This was just part of the Great Compromise, the subject of slavery had divided the Northern and the Southern states.