Our constitution’s amendments deal primarily on the protection of citizen’s rights. These rights include the right to expression, right to a proper criminal trial, right to vote, and rights to live and practice one’s life as they see fit as long as it does not impede upon the same rights given to another. So the next amendment we need added to our constitution is the right to die. If an individual is doomed to die at the hand of a terminal illness then why make their family take on a financial burden as well as an emotional one. Even more so why pay for medication that just tries to make their loved one comfortable when we have the option of giving a prescription that will ensure they’re no longer in pain. If that is what they the individual want why can’t they have it? Next to heart disease cancer is the number one deadliest illness in America and according to Cancer.org causes 589,430 deaths per year in America. Cancer is an illness defined as the abnormal growth and development of cells in the body and is very painful for most having any form of it either in the actual disease or the treatment. The medication prescribed to these individuals and the care they require can cost …show more content…
So if a person’s illness requires they get Vicodin or morphine regularly how good is their quality of life going to be? What if they can’t get out of bed or sit up on their own? If you were in that position would you want someone telling you that you have to live that way? If our constitution protects our right to live how we want, why does a state legislature get to decide how the end of someone’s life is lived? Why can’t a person whose capable of that decision and can come to that conclusion themselves decide they’d rather die with their dignity, with their self-worth intact? Our constitution protects how we live our life, but why does this protection stop the minute you’re told you’ll be dying in two
Importance of the Amendments The amendments are alterations to the constitution. They are rewritten rules, basically. Amendments are important to the United States because they add essential “rules” that the constitution had left out and without certain amendments, the United States’ government and way of living would be a lot different.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. — The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution According to the statement above and research, the First Amendment was written to protect freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly and petition. Religious minorities can be persecuted, protesters and media can be silenced, the press cannot criticize government, and citizens cannot mobilize for social change without the First Amendment. After explaining importance of First Amendment, I will explain how we can apply it to student newspapers.
The Constitution I’m going to give you a great understanding of the Constitution by defining, describing, and explaining such things as the Articles of Confederation and its importance, why the Constitution was put together and how it is thriving, the history of the Constitutional Convention and the important people involved, the main ideas and much more. I would like to say why I decided to write about the Constitution. I feel that the Constitution is a very important topic and has had a large impact on the greatness of the country we live in today. The first thing I’m going to explain and discuss is what the Articles of Confederation is and its importance.
Even though the Westboro Baptist Church offends many people with their picketing and other demonstrations, I believe that the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution should continue to protect their right of performing these acts for two reasons. One, the first amendment already protects, in a sense, some of the actions the church performs, for example, the picketing of high school graduations and claiming perverts ran the schools. As unbelievable as it may sound, the first amendment allows them to say particular things like this because of what is known as the Sullivan Rule, which is a court guideline protecting inaccurate and harmful declarations against public officials as long as the claims were not known to be false at the time they
In the United States, the First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. The founding fathers felt that this was extremely important because people came to America to escape religious persecution. It was passed on December 15, 1791, as one of te ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was written by James Madison, to provide greater constitutional protection for individual freedoms and limitiing the power of the
The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments in the Constitution. In modern day, some of these amendments are considered to be out of date, or need to be improved. These amendments are used all the time in normal life, and in the evolution of America. The First Amendment states that we, as Americans, have freedom of speech.
Physician assisted suicide, although legal in some states, should remain illegal because it goes against religious and moral beliefs. “In physician assisted suicide, the physician provides the necessary means or information and the patient performs the act” (Endlink). Supporters of assisted-suicide laws believe that mentally competent people who are in misery and have no chance of long-term survival, should have the right to die if and when they choose. I agree that people should have the right to refuse life-saving treatments, written in the patient bill of rights.
The Right to Die 1) Introduction a) Thesis statement: Physician assisted suicide offers patients a choice of getting out of their pain and misery, presents a way to help those who are already dead mentally because of how much a disease has taken over them, proves to be a great option in many states its legal in, and puts the family at ease knowing their love one is out of pain. i) The use of physician assisted death is used in many different countries and some states. ii) Many people who chose this option are fighting a terminal illness.
In the defense of Physician Assisted Suicide, a wide publicly talked about topic, it should be a choice every terminally ill patient receives. Physician Assisted suicide is when a patient is terminally ill and has no chances of recovering. The patient themselves can make the decision, with the help from their physician, to get lethally injected and end their life reducing and ending the pain. In America each state has a little over 3,000 patients that are terminally ill contact an advocacy group known as the Compassion and Choices to try to reduce end-of- life suffering and perhaps hasten their death. Physician Assisted Suicide shouldn’t be looked at as suicide, but as ending the pain and suffering from an individual whose life is going to be taken away anyway.
The Death with Dignity Act has two arguments: those who believe we have the right to choose how and when we die, and those who believe we do not possess that right; that we should not interfere with the natural order of life. Every year, people across America are diagnosed with a terminal illness. For some people there is time: time to hope for a cure, time to fight the disease, time to pray for a miracle. For others however, there is very little or no time. For these patients, their death is rapidly approaching and for the vast majority of them, it will be a slow and agonizing experience.
One of the three most important amendment is the Second Amendment that Guarantees the right to bear arms. This amendment is important because it gives people the right to have guns that help protect us. Guns also help us hunt and for most people that is a food supply. About three percent of adults own half of America's gun. Thirty two percent of American household own guns.
The dying patient no longer has quality of life, they have lost their independence, are lonely, are forced to endure inevitable pain, are publicly humiliated, are suffering immensely, and are forced to watch their loved ones grieve because of them. It is an innate Constitutional Right to choose how to die, since we all will die. There comes a point when the poking and prodding becomes too much, when the patient wants to just die in silence in the loving arms of their
Hunter Blalock Mr N Bradsher English IV Honors Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. What about Death? Chronic diseases affect approximately 133 million Americans each year (National Health Council 1). Even more, are mortally wounded.
“Under the due process clause, a U.S. citizen cannot lose his life, liberty, or property without notice and the opportunity to be heard, ” ("Arguments Against Euthanasia."). Moreover, a right is a moral claim. We do not have a claim on death, rather, death has a claim on us. Finally, the Bible. Some could argue that it should not be brought into the topic of euthanasia.
The Right to Die has been taking effect in many states and is rapidly spreading around the world. Patients who have life threatening conditions usually choose to die quickly with the help of their physicians. Many people question this right because of its inhumane authority. Euthanasia or assisted suicide are done by physicians to end the lives of their patients only in Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Montana, New Mexico and soon California that have the Right to Die so that patients don’t have to live with depression, cancer and immobility would rather die quick in peace.