Nicholas Carr argues that the exponential increase of technology has led to a more connected society but also more alienated and less able to engage with our natural capacities. Carr believes intelligent technologies like the internet amplify and numb our most intimate human capabilities, including reason, perception, memory, and emotion. In The Shallows, on page 211, Nicholas Carr states, "The price we pay to assume technology's power is alienation. The toll can be particularly high with intellectual technologies. The tools of the mind amplify and, in turn, numb the most intimate, the most human, of our natural capacities- those for a reason, perception, memory, emotion." The exponential increase of technology has led to a more connected society …show more content…
In The Shallows, it states, "I can't read War and Peace anymore," he admitted. "I've lost the ability to do that." (Carr, 7) Friedman says he can't no longer read how he usually would. Technology has changed the way people process and consume information. In "An Open Letter to High School Students about Reading," in paragraph 9, Patrick Sullivan states, "In one study, sociologists Judith C. Roberts and Keith A. Roberts found that many students see "reading" as simply forcing one's eyes to "touch" each word on the assigned pages, and many students candidly admit that they do not even read assigned materials at all. Many students read-only to finish rather than to understand what they have read." Many students have yet to be interested in reading lengthy …show more content…
In The Shallows, on page 199, it says, "Although even the initial users of the technology can often sense the changes in their patterns of attention, cognition, and memory as their brains adapt to the new medium, the most profound shifts play out more slowly, over several generations, as the technology becomes ever more embedded in work, leisure, and education- in all the norms and practices that define a society and its culture." The more technology is involved in their everyday lives, the more it will change how they think and do daily activities. These technologies have impacted their ability to think critically, remember information, and engage with others. According to Clifford Nass, "They're terrible at ignoring irrelevant information; they're terrible at keeping the information in their head nicely and neatly organized; and they're terrible at switching from one task to another." After experimenting, Nass discovered that they couldn't keep information organized nicely in their heads, and they couldn't ignore irrelevant details, which shows how the internet is impacting
The Net is the most powerful tool that exists, it is mind-altering technology and without it, people think they are not able to reach their full potential, but people are losing their social skills in the process, The Shallows by Nicholas Carr. In the book, The Shallows, the author explains how the internet is ruining our minds Carr explains how the internet is mind-altering technology. The internet pollutes our society.
(Carr, 557) Since he has been spending a lot of time on the web his attention span has decreased greatly. (Carr, 557)Research that took days to find can now be found within seconds. Nicholas thinks that his mind expects to take in information the way the net distributes it. (Carr, 557) The more you use the Web the harder it is to stay focused on what you’re reading.
Our concentration and contemplative skills have diminished thanks to our internet usage. Carr states that: “For me, as for others, the Net is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information.” Information is easily accessible and no longer requires deep research. You can easily find the idea of something on the internet by skimming it. Carr believes that our mind can be shaped by using the internet daily and could be completely different than those who read books/magazines/newspapers etcetera.
Carr describes the way our brains have changed as a consequence of using media. He later reports that when new or improved technology enters our lives, we begin to take on the qualities of those technologies, because it changes our “intellectual technologies”. He also uses the analogy of a clock, presenting the idea that we eat, work, sleep, and rise based on what time of day it is, instead of listening to our own senses. Carr then uses the claim from a 1936 British mathematician named Alan Turing that computing systems are subsuming most of our other intellectual technologies such as our map and our clock, our printing press and our typewriter, our calculator and our telephone, and our radio and our television. Likewise, he explains how the internet assumes what we are thinking and injects its context with hyperlinks, blinking ads, headlines, and other propaganda.
Carr is worried about technology and the effect that it has on the human brains. The essay provides a list of advances that show that change always brings this worry, but it does bring change. Carr does state that some of the changes are beneficial, but people should still worry about them. Nicholas Carr is right when he says that the internet is affecting us by making people’s attention spans shorter and is also affecting critical thinking skills.
Carr could have not said it any better, “what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away at my capacity for concentration and contemplation.” It has immobilized my ability to think on my own and read in-depth. Once again, technology has wiggled its way back into my life. Since reading this article, I have caught myself becoming dependent on the Internet. If I ever have questions,I automatically take out one of my devices and look up the question.
"The net is designed to be an interruption system, a machine geared to dividing attention," - Carr argues that the internet is designed to distract us and prevent us from engaging in deep and focused thinking. "The more we use the Web, the more we train our brain to be distracted... we’re losing our ability to concentrate," - Carr suggests that the constant distractions and multitasking involved in using the internet are making us less able to focus and concentrate. "The depth of our intelligence hinges on our ability to transfer information from working memory to long-term memory," - Carr suggests that the constant bombardment of information and lack of deep focus on any one topic is hindering our ability to remember and retain information. " The Web's cacophony of stimuli short-circuits both conscious and unconscious thought, preventing our minds from thinking either deeply or creatively," - Carr argues that the internet's constant barrage of information and distractions is preventing us from engaging in deep and creative thinking. "We are becoming ever more adept at scanning and skimming, but what we are losing is our capacity for concentration,
He notes that the development of writing and the printing press led to significant changes in the way people thought and communicated. By comparing the internet to these historical developments, Carr suggests that the digital age is simply the latest iteration in a long line of technological advances that have fundamentally altered human cognition. In addition, Carr appeals to expert testimony to support his argument. He cites studies and quotes from prominent neuroscientists and researchers who suggest that the internet may be negatively impacting our ability to concentrate and process information.
In Mark Bauerlei’s Too Dumb for Complex Text, he points out that a lot of U.S students have difficulty to understand complex texts such as “U.S court decision, an epic poem, [and] an ethical treatise” in today. According to Bauerlein, students are unprepared on the skills and habits to read complex texts. He explained high school does not prepare students to read, analysis, and practice their reading skill, and social media readings will not help at all: “When teachers fill the syllabus with digital texts, having students read and write blogs, wikis, Facebook pages, multimedia assemblages, and the like, they do little to address the primary reason that so many students end up not ready for college-level reading” (Bauerlei). Bauerlei believes
Additionally, multiple students and people alike would rather read a summary of a book than read the whole book. Reading books as a whole is important for brain and language development. Reading a shortcut version of a book will not give the reader valuable information and influential life lessons. Technology can disrupt the mind from the wonders of reading by desensitizing and being found more significant than
Carr continues talking about his own experience and explains, ““They supply the stuff of thought, but they also shape the process of thought. And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles.” Technology plays a major role in shaping our thinking, because it results in us thinking less about what we’re seeing online and just assuming that it’s true. It’s depriving us of the ability to challenge the information, which puts us in danger of misinformation and lack of individual thought.
Society's perception of the world has changed as a result of the new options provided by digital technology. In his book The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to our Brains, Harvard-educated writer Nicholas Carr analyzes how contemporary technologies are affecting how people think. He offers insight into the psychological ramifications of each technological advancement throughout history and how culture has influenced how society goes about its daily business. In order to demonstrate how negatively digital technology is affecting our brains, he contrasts its impacts with those of earlier technologies like reading, writing, books, and calculators. Due to their over-reliance on the internet, people have allowed themselves to become cognitively
Today’s innovation is the internet, and the internet is proving to be just the same. Carr says that the attentiveness, thoughtfulness, and socialization of modern day society, or rather the lack of, is to the blame of the internet. Although Carr creates a strong argument, and does nothing but continually back up his thesis with good facts, but it is his actual thesis that I disagree with. Carr constantly states historical and scientific facts that show how the internet is following a path from the past.
Over generations and generations the world has seen many changes that has impacted the world and the lives of people. Some of those changes include the printing press, computers, and the smartphone. Have you ever realized that the internet might be affecting your brain? Well Nicholas Carr thinks the internet is bad and has an impact on our brain. In the book The Shallows by Nicholas Carr he claims that over many generations new technology has been created and it has been affecting our brains.
Nicholas Carr, What the Internet is doing to Our Brains The Shallows (2010) asserts that, “The price we pay to assume technology’s power is alienation.” He supports this assertion by saying, “They both ultimately achieve their mental and behavioral effects by shaping the synaptic organization of the brain.” Also by, “ We long to keep it activated.” The writer concludes in order for people to improve their thoughts, they will have to cope with the new technology and how they think. Carr believes that technology is taking over how people interact with each other.