I’ve read a book called David and Goliath by Malcolm Gladwell. It is a non-fiction book that focuses on psychology and sociology. I have two sub-topics (The Inverted U-Curve and the Three Strike Law) to explain how the right amount in virtually any aspect of life is important to success.
-The Inverted U-Curve-
Have you ever had to complete a task that had a tight deadline that you needed some inspiration and something extra to complete?
Although you might’ve found it rigorous and challenging, you might just have completed the best work of your ability.
And think about a task where there wasn’t pressure at all, with extremely long deadlines and not challenging at all. You might just have done only partial best.
There is a sophisticated relationship between pressure
…show more content…
In other words, if you commit a crime the second time, you serve double and if you commit the 3rd time, you get sentenced minimum 25 yrs. in jail, no matter what crime it is. This was a new law implemented after a man who was recently paroled. He had many criminal records such as drug possession and gun abuse. At the time of release, he was on influence and was a drug addict. He tried to steal a teenagers’ car and she resisted, only to get a bullet through her head.
After this, the law was passed by 71% for, which was astonishing as in the United States, the Republicans and the Democrats barely agreed on anything. As soon as it was put on effect, it had astonishing results. In California, assassinations dropped by 50%, from 12 to 6.
However, as time passed, many raised voice about this being not as effective. According to criminologist David Kennedy, just by increasing the punishment, criminals who can’t think straight won’t be shaken by this. Only normal people, who have stakes in the society, will think twice before committing a crime.
There is another reason many called the law to
The 3 Strike Law is a law that applies to offender that have a history of being convicted of two or more violent crimes, and have moved on to committing another serious offense. Consequently, their prison sentence is increased in comparison to their previous sentences resulting in receiving a punishment to life in prison at their third offense. However, in 1994 the state of California enacted the law were criminals could be incarcerated when committing a non-violent crime for the third time, as long as they had a history of ever committing a serious or violent felony, the 3 Strike Law will still apply to them. The 3 strike Law is beneficial to society by removing the criminals off the street and preventing them from ever putting people at risk of being victimized by them again.
Third, crimes are more effectively prevented by the certainty of punishment—not by the severity of punishment. Jefferson’s proposed bill, the “Bill on Crimes and Punishments,” for a more humanitarian
Some people might think he is an expert of criminology because of the way he wrote the article. For this reason, it was easier for me to take his opinion more seriously. He understands the need to express himself in a manner that is easy to read and understand. By writing in this way, he can easily persuade someone to his point of view. Jacoby’s description of prison life was a very persuasive emotional appeal.
The author has included two research questions: whether or not the original intent of the Three Strikes law is understood and whether the law has effectively reduced crime and recidivism rates. The method used in the article is case study whereby the author focuses on the California version of the Three Strikes law. In addition, the article employs a multidisciplinary approach in analyzing the case study including history, political science and sociology. The author found out that the California Three Strikes Law has failed to meet its initial goal of reducing the number of repeat offenders in the prison system.
The policy is based off of baseball in which if the batter gets three strike then they are out. The Three Strikes Policy is a law that significantly increases the prison sentence of a person who is convicted of a felony who has also been previously convicted of two or more other violent crimes or serious felonies in their past. This “third strike” is limited to nothing short of 25 years to life for those criminals even with a small third offense. The law was passed by former president Bill Clinton in 1993 when crime rates
Under the law of three strikes, which was implemented in some states of United States, a convict was awarded minimum 25 years to life if he was three time repeat offenders with multiple prior serious or violent felony convictions. California was the first state to implements this law where several high profile murders committed by felons. Residents were worried that these serial criminal would be released from the prison only to commit new, often serious and violent
The “Three Strikes Law” has been highly controversial since it was introduced by our government in the early and into the mid 1990’s. Specifically the “Three Strikes Law” looks to target persistent and prior offenders to impose harsher sentences. Since such a small percentage of the population commits such a large percent of crime, the “Three Strikes Law” was designed to incapacitate the repeat offenders. The mandated and elongated prison sentences given out by the judges for repeat offenders have been criticized and enclose both benefits and detriments. Throughout this paper I will look to delve deeper into the “Three Strikes Law” to determine the constitutionality of the statute while looking at specific case examples to support my theory
All across America, two and three strikes laws have been part of the Justice Department’s Strategy for Anti-Violence. These kinds of policies make a few requirements. One of the requirements is that if an individual has been found guilty of committing a felony that was violent, and also has two convictions on their record, they will serve a life sentence automatically. The two strike and three strike laws main focal point is to highly increase the punishments of the individuals that are convicted of more than two crimes that are considered serious. The purpose of this essay is to discuss two strike and three strike laws, if these laws positively or negatively affects the society, and if whether or not these laws are fair.
In the United States, habitual offender laws, are statutes enacted by state governments which mandates the courts to impose harsher sentences on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses. What this means is that people that have been put in prison 3 times will get a harsher punishment going from whatever they 're consequence is to life in prison. I am against this law, for reasons I will talk about later. The origin of the three strikes law came from article 2 section 28 of the Montana constitution in 1998, which states the three strikes law.
They found that these men desisted from crime when routine and structure was introduced to them. Routine and structure would be to focus on the offender’s family life and less time spending with peers who influence crime. Removing the individual from their criminal
This is americas wake up call on the matter of gun control. Seventeen high school students were shot to death in a place where they were suppose to be safe, a place where they were getting their education but the bigger question, what is going to be done? This recent wake up call has begun to make americans and politicians reconsider the policies the government holds onto, in order to change the law to fit to the needs of all americans, no matter how they feel about gun control. One
They point to statistics that show a decrease in crime rates in New York State since these laws were enacted. Additionally, they argue that the threat of longer prison terms deters some individuals from committing violent crimes in the first
After three decades of quiescence in the arena of gun control politics, the turmoil of the 1960s unleashed a wave of demand for new gun control legislation. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas on November 22, 1963, prompted the country to focus on the regulation of firearms. Then the urban riots beginning in 1964 and the 1968 assassinations of Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. and Senator Robert F. Kennedy fueled an inferno of outrage that demanded congressional action. This inspired this major revision to federal gun laws The death of John F. Kennedy, who was slaughtered by a mail-ordered weapon that had a place with Lee Harvey Oswald, inspired this major revision to federal gun laws.
Issue Presented: The use of rational choice theory, as well as labeling theory in regards to decision making and assisting in developing departmental policy. Short Answer: The ability to enforce stricter rules will change the thought process of offender before committing a crime or rule violation, along with making them productive members of society through re-entry will lift the label off of them. Statement of Facts: The use of rational choice theory can be used to help determine what offenders thought process maybe during the commitment of violating facility rules. This is often considered “risk vs reward.” (SNHU, 2018)According to the book Criminological Theories it states “rationality is the decision-making process of determining the
A sense of accomplishment is invaluable to a person. Not only does a sense of accomplishment build confidence and faith in oneself, but it also allows one to reflect on how wonderful the journey to the accomplishment was, and how every little struggle and triumph was worth it. In the middle of summer, where time seems endless and the stress of the previous school year has been shed by students, I never expected to find out that I scored a five on both of the advanced placement exams I took. Nor did I have one-hundred percent confidence the goals we set as section leaders of the marching band would actually be met. Yet to my surprise, I had the good fortune of accomplishing challenging things in both aspects of my life.