The Joint Commission was founded in 1951 was also went through a name change and became the Joint Commission on Accreditation. Hospital facilities are under Joint Commission of Hospitals across the US. In 1953, JCAH began accrediting hospitals. The Social Security Amendments of 1965 passed by Congress announced that hospitals accredited by JCAH were allowed to participate in the Medicaid and Medicare programs. In 1987, the name was shortened and it became the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). This was necessary to provide Medicare and Medicaid to patients because these are government programs and needs to be evaluated to keep funding available for the healthcare
The Joint Commission is an independent, not-for-profit group in the United States that administers voluntary accreditation programs for hospitals and other healthcare organizations (for example, long term care, mental health, and ambulatory care). The commission develops performance standards that address crucial elements of operation, such as patient care, medication safety, and infection control and consumer rights. Patient safety is one of the main focus of the Joint Commission. They make sure their standards provide the best service by helping health care organizations to improve the quality and safety of the care they provide.
Another major point Lockwood made was that President Trump would be terminating the requirement of health insurance because he does not agree with the amount of money being paid to insurance companies to offer premiums to low income or young customers. Lockwood says we should expect to lose all federal support for Medicare and Medicaid, which is currently helping thousands of people. By cutting out these programs, it not only hurts the customers but also the hospital employees. Growing up in a family of medical professionals, Lockwood points out a perspective that usually goes unseen. While the families impacted largely are those
Liability Issues Primarily, Caring Memorial Hospital will be held liable in this malpractice case under the premise of respondeat superior. “Under respondeat superior an employer is liable for the negligent act or omission of any employee acting within the course and scope of his employment” (Thornton, 2010, para. 2). The risk manager Susan Post, JD and the quality assurance director Amy Green were both aware of the potential for increased risk on the Oncology unit. They had been making observations several months prior to incident that related to deficiencies in staffing and safety standards. Per, ASCO and ONS (2012) new staff are required to demonstrate competency and receive comprehensive chemotherapy education.
Memorial Hermann http://www.memorialhermann.org/about-us/ The Memorial Herman health care organization has over 30,000 staff members, including physicians, nurses, clinical and administrative staff, and more. Memorial Herman focuses on evidence-based medicine to provide the best quality and safest care to their patients. Memorial Herman is national known and recognized for this its quality of care.
As the government wanted to cut healthcare spending as it is a major part of the deficit.
Last week I found the information that I gathered from the assignment on conducting a visit to a local healthcare facility to hold the most interesting concepts from me. Having worked for different healthcare facilities, I have had my share of Joint Commission visits. It is not at all a visit that hospital employees look forward to. Learning about the details behind what the surveyors intend to achieve by examining hospital practices, questioning employees and asking patients about their stay makes more sense now.
The law seeks to prevent overutilization, preserve freedom of choice, limit cost and maintain competition. Applies to: This law is not applicable for all referrals. The law only applies to Federal Healthcare Programs. E.g. Medicare, Medicaid.
Joint Commission The Joint Commission is an independent, not-for-profit group in the United States that administers voluntary accreditation programs for hospitals and other healthcare organizations (for example, long term care, mental health, and ambulatory care). The commission develops performance standards that address crucial elements of operation, such as patient care, medication safety, and infection control and consumer rights. According to Rouse M. (2015), the Joint Commission standards function as the foundation for healthcare organizations to measure and improve their performance. These standards focus on quality care and patient safety.
The doctors feel they were safeguarding the rights of the individual against intrusion of the welfare state. The doctors said the government cares more about its budget then its patients.
Because of reviewing the “Political Irony” and comparing the lesson it made me review and question several factors in the PPACA legislation what and how does this legislation offer Americans? As I view health care where it stands today, where it has mitigated from in the past decade it baffles my mind. It was in the 1960’s, when Lyndon B. Johnson brought about the first change for Americans health care to a system that required help. Medicare was implemented under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide health insurance to people age 65 and older, regardless of income or medical history due to its price and its unaffordability by people over the age of 65. In that same year under the Social Security Amendments of 1965 Medicaid
A Second Look at the Affordable Care Act David E. Mann, ABA American Military University POLS210 Abstract Since the passing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), twenty-eight states have either filed joint or individual lawsuits to strike down the PPACA. This document will examine a few key elements that the President of the United States must take into consideration when reviewing the act and moving forward to either ratify the act, replace the act, or leave the act as it is. Topics that will be presented will include; the current issues being debated, two competing thoughts on how to fix the ACA, an evaluation of the preferred solution, and finally the responsibility of each level of government. Patient
Healthcare in the United States is in desperate need of reform. There are several rationales to further explain this proposition. As an illustration, the Declaration of Independence states our unalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In other words, every individual should be entitled to healthcare as it preserves life and promotes the general welfare. The federal government should, therefore, enact a program of universal health to better protect and serve all of its citizens.
Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.
It is the classic example of market failure. All in all, government intervention in healthcare is due to the government intervention itself. These interventions include the patent law which deliberated to advocate innovative activity and licensure which is intended to maintain minimal standards of quality. All these contribute to the monopoly power that dominates the whole market as well. The specific person or enterprise manages to control the whole market since they are the only supplier of a particular commodity.
This is so because, universal access to health will really do good to the world and it is a Necessity in order to reduce the level of discrimination experienced in terms of finances . Universal access to health will ensure that there will be access to equitable quality health care and will also give security to those who are financially incapable at the present to afford quality health care die to their financial status. Although this may be the case in the future, there will face challenges especially in implementing the regulations that would be set up in order to enable equal distribution of medical resource and