When it comes to describing such complex events as the Kennedy administration, one cannot understand the full picture through a single work. By combining different works of both fact and fiction, alongside motion pictures, one can gain a clearer interpretation of JFK’s presidency. Investigating Garry Wills’s The Kennedy Imprisonment alongside James Ellroy’s American Tabloid, one can develop a clearer picture of how the Kennedy administration functioned. The film Thirteen Days by Roger Donaldson brings to life the depiction presented in the two works. The Kennedy’s had a very magnetic persona and people were often pulled in their direction. Aside from this magnetic persona, their administration demanded loyalty from all of those involved. Although the …show more content…
Both Garry Wills’s The Kennedy Imprisonment and Chris Matthews Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero discuss the life of JFK. Although both these works cover the same content, they provide two completely different standpoints on his administration. Matthews takes a much more favorable approach when presenting the life of JFK, while Wills takes a more antagonistic one. Wills portrays the Kennedys as ruthless leaders who use the people around them and then dispose of them. Wills mentions how after Arthur Krock, who “spent decades serving the career of Joseph Kennedy”, opposed JFK’s statement on civil rights, he was released (Wills 87). This display of disloyalty would lead to, “Kennedy, once in office, arranged for attacks on Krock to run in Newsweek, and was disappointed that they were so mild” (Wills 87). Wills uses this one example to really enforce the idea that the Kennedy’s were interested in one’s loyalty, but at the first sign of opposition, they were willing to destroy someone. One could not work for the Kennedy’s unless they vowed their loyalty, but Wills shows that the Kennedys didn’t care to repay that loyalty. Chris Matthews, who is quite fond of JFK,
Kennedy used the tone in which sounded like he was disappointed of the companies. He said “ increasing steel prices by some 6 dollars a ton, constitutes a wholly unjustifiable and irresponsible defiance of the public interest,” he basically said they acted irresponsible in front of the public. He also stated, that them increasing the price of steel was hurting the
This is a really intriguing story. I enjoyed Dixon’s conflict even though at points I thought he was kind of a douche because of the thoughts he had with his wife or son. Still, I understood him at the same time. There are a lot of men in this story so the use of he and him gets confusing without saying who the narrator is talking about.
Kennedy, through this story and many others shows just how much courage is ‘easier said than done’. The mob mentality of the mid 1800s are heightened to exponential levels with billions of people now able to express their opinions instantly to the world, which shows just how special courage can be today. Any viewpoint can be expressed at any time, and for a person to willingly take a position, no matter how controversial or dangerous, should be respected. No matter their
It was November 21st and I, Laura Berman, was sitting in a parlor with the one and only John F. Kennedy. The parlor wasn’t grand, honestly it almost drab, but it had a quaint homey feel to it. It was almost as if it had held a life much simpler than ours. I sat on the arm of a La-Z-boy with a glass of whiskey in my right hand.
“MALE NARRATOR: And as for any major ideas from Mr. Nixon: EISENHOWER: If you give me a week, I might think of one. I don 't remember.” (Document A) Clearly, since the president doesn’t remember any of Nixon’s ‘important experience’, Nixon is just as experienced as Kennedy.
Reagan also includes that he did not support Kennedy’s campaign at the time, but hindsight allowed him to realize how respectable Kennedy’s passionate and influential time his time in office was. This gives Kennedy even more credibility and respect because even though Reagan supported a different political party than Kennedy, he was sill able to recognize in front of the public that Kennedy’s “political fights were tough”, “he gave as good as he got, and you could see that he loved the battle” (Reagan, 8). Respect comes from admirable actions and ideas rather than simply aligning beliefs. In his concluding remarks, Raegan asserts that “Many men are great, but few capture the imagination of the spirit of the times. The ones that do are unforgettable” (Reagan, 11) before going on to say that the five presidents since Kennedy have thought of Kennedy throughout their own presidency, implying the deep seeded respect that Kennedy
Kennedy aimed to garner the trust of those yet to support him. He manages to win needed favor through different rhetorical strategies while also instilling enough trust to persuade them towards his ideas. This great leader had an idea of how to mend his turbulent country. He planned to unite America towards civil duty through inspiration and hope. With this plan in mind, he called on his fellow Americans everywhere "to assure the survival and success of liberty."
He would never side with one person. Kennedy is accountable for many outstanding things. For example, he avoided a nuclear war with Cuba, fighting in the Vietnam War, and was a very outspoken on the subject of civil rights. Kennedy’s interaction with
John F. Kennedy was arguably one of the most influential leaders during his shortened timespan as president of the United States. During the presidential election of 1960, John F. Kennedy ran against Richard Nixon with a desire to stimulate the nation. Although proven an obstacle at certain points, John F. Kennedy’s young age, catholic faith, television presence, and aspiration to bring the United States out of the cold war were influential to his overall success. Kennedy’s Catholic background was one of the highest determining factors during his campaign. Those of strict religious backgrounds did not necessarily feel that they should cast their vote for a man with such sincere Catholic beliefs.
Despite their apparent perfection, Robert Kennedy displayed a clear power imbalance within their family. The first example of this is that throughout the memoir Robert always refers to his brother as “the President” and never by name when he typically calls others by their last names. For example, Nikita Khrushchev was chairman of the Soviet Union’s Council of Ministers at the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis but he was rarely addressed in the formal sense that President Kennedy was. Addressing his brother in such a formal tone shows how highly Robert thought of JFK. Calling JFK “the president” rather than his brother also hid their familial connection and created an opportunity for Robert to create a name for himself aside from his brother.
As President Kennedy enters office he gives an speech on the celebration of freedom; symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning of a new nation. Kennedy rises for the opportunity for persuasion after his inauguration has been addressed and he scarcely beats nixon. President Kennedy uses his authority for persuasion to bring the american people together under his power. The president uses the experience of war,poverty,and the desire for peace to develop an emotional appeal between the U.S and the world population. In this speech Kennedy uses ethos,pathos,logos,as well as other rhetorical devices to convince the audience.
John F. Kennedy was known for his charming, charismatic, and relatable personality which significantly attributed to him winning the presidency in 1960. These admirable characteristics of his were easily seen in his speeches as U.S. senator and as president, in which it was apparent he not only had the charm, but also incorporated his personal values into his administration as a public servent. One speech in particular which highlights this fact is his “City Upon a Hill” speech. John F. Kennedy’s “City Upon a Hill” speech was given on Jan. 9th 1961 as his final speech prior to being sworn in as president, which he delivered to the general court of Massachusetts. In this speech, Kennedy compared the impending challenges of his presidency to the troubles facing the first Puritan settlers of Massachusetts in the 1600's in John Winthrop’s original “city upon a hill” speech.
John F. Kennedy, a former president of the United States, delivered his “Cuban Missile Crisis” speech on October 22, 1962, to the United States citizens and captives in Cuba. Those people were terrified of a nuclear missile attack during the Cold War time period. Due to the primary use of logos in Kennedy’s “Cuban Missile Crisis” speech, he informs his audience about the type of missiles in Cuba and the steps to be taken to respond to the Soviet Union’s placement of missiles in Cuba. This would hopefully alleviate some of the fear of the citizens of the United States. He shows pathos by continuing to ease the citizens’ fear of a missile attack by showing compassion towards the people.
Rhetorical analyst Omair Khan states that Kennedy “had an enormous level of credibility as well as the authority and experience that comes with being the president of the United States” which is true because as the president, he had a huge amount of good will and was to be believed to turn the circumstances around
John F Kennedy was a level headed, determined and well accomplished person. During his short-lived presidency, he had to take on challenges like no other and did it with sophistication and grace. From conflicts involving other countries, like Vietnam, to the Civil Rights Movement that directly affected our own country, Kennedy continued to take each problem day by day until there was an overall improvement or resolution. It would be safe to say that he is one of the more progressive presidents our country has ever seen. David Burner’s John F. Kennedy and a New Generation was written with the sole purpose of giving an insight into Kennedys upbringing and presidency in an entirely unbiased approach.