The Long Christmas Ride Home by Paula Vogel is a play about a family of five, and their experience on Christmas day, as well as the future of the three children. I believe that this was meant to take place in the early-sixties to the late-seventies because of the mother’s housewife role in the play, and the way the grandfather would accept the mistreatment of his own daughter from her husband, but would stand up for the mistreatment of his grandson—a clearly sexist view that would not be accepted in today’s society. Another hint about the time period is that Stephen died from a disease contracted during sex, one that eventually killed him. This makes me think that this was before or during the AIDS epidemic. The children are Rebecca, age twelve, …show more content…
There were several elements of the script that impacted me, but their father’s affair with Sheila is what stood out to me the most. We are able to know his thoughts and feelings throughout the play, and he spends the majority of his time thinking about Sheila rather than his wife and children. The parents do not see the impact they have on their children, who will grow up to reflect their parents in different ways. The father’s affair is not secret, but nobody in the family says it out loud either. The children know, as does their …show more content…
I liked that Paula Vogel did not hold back and let all of the emotions of the play loose. I am anticipating that I will enjoy the play. I personally think I would like it more if the characters were portrayed by only people rather that people holding puppets, but they have too much symbolic meaning to be left out. I think the puppets are meant to resemble the fact that we really have no control over our own lives as children. The release of the real people from the puppets into adults symbolizes the freedom from their
I feel that the husband, and main character, by telling his family about his secret, he would now be able to reset the rigid and distant boundaries to set up clear and effective ones. The new effective boundaries would reconnect and support the spousal subsystem and strengthen the parental system. My concern with the youngest son is that he has excluded himself from the family. The symptoms from the exclusions has resulted in a fetish for obese women and over-sexualization.
Overall, the performance was great and brought my attention to a lot of little details. I am surprised to say that I enjoyed the play much more than I did the movie. I have a new appreciation for the art of theater. The elements brought out in the play made all the emotions seem realistic and not just a performance. Seeing the lights dim, hearing a gloomy song, and watching the facial expression of an upset character makes the performance seem so much realer than watching a man on television talk about being sad.
The number one thing that bothered me in this novel though, was that the father got to choose who his daughters married. No matter how much I trust my father, I would never let him choose the man I would be spending the rest of my life with. Many women grew up unhappy because they wanted their freedom to choose the person they want to love forever. Women were looking for more rights and respect. Lucky for them, some rights were granted to them.
A significant part of the rest of the play is loaded with the duplicitous machinations of the different individuals from the family. At different times Henry courts every child, wanting to propel his plan through untruths and control. Eleanor does likewise. Now and again it is hard to tell who needs what and what the truth is. The three sons do likewise, blending up with one another in different combinations, planning to get the assistance of the others.
“An Inspector Calls” is a play written by J.B. Priestly, in which a mysterious inspector interrogates a wealthy, upper-middle class English family about their responsibility for the death of a young girl. The play itself was first premiered in the United Kingdom in 1946, a crucial point in the history of the country. Following the trauma of the Second World War, and the incredible damage suffered as a result of the Blitz, the nation’s political situation was beginning to shift massively towards socialist ideologies: with the first Labour government in several years, led by Clement Attlee, and the foundation of the NHS. All these issues were clearly on Priestley’s mind, as he wrote the play: remaining to this day one of the most socialist works to have been written in Britain to date.
The use of unrealistic elements is where “the most significant transaction of the puppet show ultimately takes place, however, in a parodic scene of discovery in which, as Charles Woods so dryly puts it, “What may be called non-realistic elements are juxtaposed or mingled with realistic elements”” (Lisa Freeman). This transaction illustrates how the use of unrealistic elements can give helpful insight during some of the most difficult scenes for the audience. The writer’s intentions and usage of this element are insightful to the audience, with the intent to clear up any confusion the audience may have experienced while giving detailed insight of other aspects of the characters life, and the emotions they are going through, giving the play a more “real life” feeling and connection between the audience and the characters on
I had mixed emotions from this production but overall I thought it was a great experience and I thought the production itself had an excellent message behind it. Initially it was hard for me to understand the dialogue because of the accents, but as the play went along my brain adjusted and it was a lot clearer and enjoyable. The time period in which the play took place had a negative effect on me. Daniel who is Elin Jean’s father is extremely closed minded and basically held Margaret against her will and forced her to marry him.
Contrasting and Comparing You may think the play and movie of “A Christmas Carol” are the same. Well you are quite mistaken. In the Play and Movie they are very different from each other. From watching the movie and reading the play the Climax, the Conflict, and the resolution are different from each other.
“Kayak” is a story that uses characters to symbolize the arrogance of people from first world countries. Like any good mother, Annie Iversion is incredibly protective of her son. Annie’s world comes crumbling down when her son, Peter Inversion, starts falling in love with Julie, a passionate environmental activist. Julie’s love for protesting and dangerous lifestyle concerns Annie as it starts changing the way she had originally planned Peter’s life. Annie is unable to understand Julie’s perspective and is worried for her son.
The older generation, portrayed as Mr. and Mrs. Birling in the play, thinks that taking individual responsibility is important, but not the social responsibilities. They deny their faults for Eva Smith’s death, and furthermore, try to avoid the situation by blaming others. The phrase, “I am not responsible” is constantly used in their lines which specify their strong conservative mindset. On the other hand, the younger generation, portrayed as Sheila and Eric in the play, is more open-minded and honest when it comes to admitting and accepting their responsibilities in the society. Sheila and Eric both feel guilty about themselves during the interrogations, when their parents tried to deny the fact that they were responsible too.
The productions of this play were successful through stage design, lighting crewing, and acting. Those three aspects made the quality of the play stand out to me, as an audience member. The production of the set design of the play was a good effort. The set design for the play staging aims for the sweet spot between feeding adult nostalgia and satisfying a new generation of children.
Throughout the play, the characters look at faith, race, opportunities, fatherhood and
Eva Smith is the most important character in ‘An Inspector Calls’ in my opinion. She is used as a tool by Priestley, to show us how the capitalists treat others and how they don’t care about others and how they think they have power over others in the low working class. “if they didn 't get rid of that girl, I 'd never go near the place again” Sheila Birling sacked Eva Smith form her second job because she was ‘laughing at her’ this is showing us that the upper class do whatever they want because of their wealth, class and privileges. Even though Eva Smith was never on the stage play; she is still important because a working class woman like her cant do anything to the upperclass families; yet she made the Birling family (an upperclass family) feel bad and guilty about their actions and take responsibility for corrupting her life. Eva Smith is the perfect example to show the audience that you might not be affected by this but someone might be and you will be the blame for it.
The play's plot is about the main character recalling memories of his mother and sister. He talks about how his father left their family. The play is mostly about how Tom and his sister are not what a mother would want in children at the time. Tom was unsatisfied with his warehouse job and wanted to be a writer while his sister was seen as disabled and was extremely shy. Tom's mother, Amanda continues to nag Laura to get a husband and nags Tom about his job which leads to them arguing often.
I found the play to be very interesting as I was kinda confused in the beginning, but it ended up making a bit more sense in the end. There was many hilarious moments in the play that I really enjoyed.