The Outcasts Of Poker Flat Compare And Contrast

832 Words4 Pages

A California town, outcasts, cheaters, a battle against nature and jumping frogs… that might sound like the premise for an epic novel, but these are a mix of elements from two separate short stories, The Outcasts of Poker Flat by Bret Harte and The Notorious Jumping Frog of Calaveras County by Mark Twain. Harte’s story follows John Oakhurst, a professional gambler, who has become an outcast in the small California town of Poker Flats during the gold rush. His success as a gambler leads to a negative reputation and he is forced to leave the town along with a band of outcasts. A few conflicts arise, but none so severe as the blizzard that strikes them while they’re in the mountains. Oakhurst’s life of gambling success is long gone and all the bad luck he encounters leads him to suicide (Harte 674-684). In the other story the narrator has received a letter from a friend asking him to look into someone named Leonidas W. Smiley. The narrator asks an old man, Simon Wheeler, what hen knows of the name and Wheeler goes off on a completely unrelated story about another …show more content…

The narrator in The Notorious Jumping Frog of Calaveras County does very little storytelling. He introduces us to Simon Wheeler by a barroom stove in an old tavern; then we spend the next three full pages listening to him (Twain 662-665). The narrator interrupts Wheeler and he ends our story (Twain 666). In The Outcasts of Poker Flat the narrator is outside the story and we do not know who it is. The narrator follows John Oakhurst from the beginning when he becomes an outcast (Harte 674) to the end when he dies (Harte 684). In both stories the narrators are outside and unrelated to the main story, but Twain’s story is told more from dialogue, immerged in another short story of the narrator and Simon Wheeler; in Harte’s story the narrator has no connection with the story except for the fact he is sharing

Open Document