Over a period of several months, British intelligence in the American colony of Massachusetts had located stockpiles of weapons and provisions which they believed the colonists would use to stage a rebellion. The British planned to march with secrecy to Concord and destroy all military stores, including artillery, ammunition, provisions, tents, and small arms (Order Given to Lt. Colonel Francis Smith from Thomas Gage). The British also had to occupy the North Bridge and South Bridge in Concord. While the British were there, they intended to go to Lexington and arrest Samuel Adams and John Hancock, supposed leaders of the rebellion. The British were also ordered to not hurt or steal from the citizens or damage property. Although there is conflicting …show more content…
During the British march to Lexington, where they were ordered to destroy the colonists’ weapons and provisions, approximately 500 patriots assembled to stop the British. “...we still continued advancing, keeping prepared against an attack tho’ without intending to attack them, but on our coming near them they fired one or two shots…” (Lt. John Barker, British Soldier, 4th Regiment, Diary Account on the beginning of the march to Lexington). The British soldiers were not looking for a fight, as they wanted to avoid conflict, but they were prepared for anything. The Patriots fired at the British without being provoked, thus, they were the aggressors. The British returned from Lexington and Concord very dismayed. Paul Revere, Samuel Prescott, and William Dawes alerted the colonists in Boston and nearby that the British were coming. The Patriots hid the ammunition, weapons, and supplies under a field and John Hancock and Samuel Adams were able to escape British capture. On the British return to Boston, the colonial militias attacked. “...we were fired on from Houses and behind Trees...People had hid themselves in houses ‘till we had passed and then fired” (Lt. John Barker, 4th Regiment, Diary Account on Battle Road). The colonists had no mercy and fired first at the British, who had come to simply restore order. The Patriots were the aggressors at Concord and Lexington because they …show more content…
They heavily relied on guerrilla tactics, which is a style of warfare that consists of hiding, using cover, and conducting hit-and-run attacks. On the British return from Concord, the Patriots surrounded the British and pounced. “...the Country was an amazing strong one, full of Hills, Woods, stone Walls, &c. which the Rebels did not fail to take advantage of, for they were all lined with People who kept an incessant fire upon us…” (Lt. John Barker, 4th Regiment, Diary Account on Battle Road). Clearly, this quote depicts an ambush on the British by the colonists. An ambush suggests that the Patriots wanted to kill or scare the British, and since it was a surprise attack, they fired first. This ambush, however, was not decided at the last minute; the Patriots had planned for it. Besides the fact that they were storing weapons, the colonists’ ambush was premeditated. “We all heard the alarm, and were ready to help fit out father and brother, who made an early start for Concord” (Alice Stearns Abbott, Citizen of Bedford, Massachusetts, on the Beginning of Fighting). The alarm would have been a tolling church bell or could have spread by word of mouth, and this warning system was planned. The location of the colonial militias, concentrated near the North Bridge, was decided in advance. The Patriots thoughtfully planned an ambush on the British, therefore, they were the
British Army Officer Francis Smith is the British Major General of the battle of Lexington. He received the order from the government of the Great Britain that there are many weapons like guns in Concord which located just near Boston. Francis Smith was very happy and wanted to use these weapons to improve the military power of the Great Britain, so he ordered and sent his troops to find the weapons and bring them back. However, when the worker John Parker heard this news, he was shocked and angry at the British troops. John Parker decided to break the scheme down.
Fire, damn you! Suddenly the line of British muskets exploded to flame…” Then he Battle of concord on page 278 it stated, “Suddenly there was a burst of fire, and it was not the rebel’s nit was Laurie’s’ men… The rebels fired a second time with more precision still, but then all order was gone, the scene engulfed in vast fog, shouts and screams blending with hard pops and chatter of the muskets. Too many still moving away, pursued by their own shock, the awful horror of the unexpected, leaving their own dead and wounded behind.”
After looking at both the American account and the English account from The Battle of Lexington, The English account provides more information to prove that the Americans might have shot first. The British soldiers wanted to avoid violence, when shots were fired it was a quick skirmish and the british army was barely wounded.1 Earlier a letter was sent to General Gage in January but received in April. The letter included that , Dartmouth, Gage’s higher in command ordered gage, in letter to use force against the patriots.2 The American’s could have figured out that the English were planning on coming because the General Gage was married to Margaret Kemble, an American colonial women. It is said that she had spied against him out of sympathy
Lexington and Concord was also known as "the shot heard around the world. " The battle started on April 19, 1775; the British troops were sent to confiscate colonial weapons, After searching Concord for about four hours, the British prepared to return to Boston located 18 miles away. By that time, almost 2,000 militiamen who were known as minutemen for their ability to be ready on a moment’s notice, had descended to the area, and more were constantly arriving. At first, the minutemen simply followed the British column. Fighting started again soon after, however with the minutemen firing at the British from behind trees, stone walls, houses and sheds.
Before the battle of king’s mountain the loyalist shouted threats at the patriots. They would yell at the patriots and tell them go ahead and try to attack us we dare you. That wasn 't the only thing that caused this battle the patriots were almost all from Massachusetts so they
Nearly every account from the Colonists says that the British fired first, and nearly every account from the British say that the Colonists fired first. John Robins, a member of the Lexington militia, said, “the foremost of the three officers ordered their men, saying ‘Fire, by God, fire,’ at which moment we received a very heavy and close fire from them . . . Captain Parker’s men, I believe, had not then fired a gun” (Doc I). Being a part of the militia, and knowing some of the people that might get blamed if people thought the Colonists fired first, could lead to Robins trying to shift the blame away from his own people and onto the British, even if it really was the militia that fired first.
In 1775, Joseph Warren, the president of the Massachusetts Provincial Congress, writes a letter regarding the battle of Lexington to the inhabitants of Great Britain. Warren states the want for a session of hon. continental congress by the colony of Massachusetts. He recalls the event of April 18th, the king’s troops lead by Colonel Smith landed at Cambridge planning to overthrow or destroy the military. However, in Lexington, the armed men marched into the colony and likewise to the main text, the colony was occupied with seventy minutemen.
In the early 1760’s, the tension between the people in Boston and the British soldiers started to grow until in early 1770, when the two groups reached their breaking point. On March 5, 1770, a group of men started intimidating a British soldier; he soon called for assistance but eventually the crowd had grown to practically one hundred people. Captain Thomas Preston and seven other soldiers arrived, trying to calm the situation down, but to no avail. A soldier fired into the crowd followed by the other soldiers firing soon after, resulting in five people being killed. Captain Thomas Preston happened to be arrested and charged with murder.
The conflict quickly becoming known as “The Bloody Massacre” or “The Boston Massacre”; it fanned the flames of anger to the British, and was one of the main reasons the Revolution started. The eight British soldiers, and their captain, Thomas Preston, were all given trials, their lawyer being John Adams, future president. Adams claimed that the colonists were an angry, unorganized mob, that forced his clients to open fire on them. According to Adams, Attucks was leading the fight, though constant debate raged about how he was involved in it. Samuel Adams said that Attucks was simply “leaning on a stick” when the firing started.
After the battle of Lexington, the British soldiers meet up and head to Concord, five miles to the west to seize arms and capture any rebels (Fradin). Starting the second battle of the Revolutionary War. The first battle of the American Revolution left a win for the British, but also a great loss of many soldiers’
https://www.paulreverehouse.org/the-real-story/ explained “On the evening of April 18, 1775, Paul Revere was summoned by Dr. Joseph Warren of Boston and given the task of riding to Lexington, Massachusetts, with the news that regular troops were about to march into the countryside northwest of Boston. According to Warren, these troops planned to arrest Samuel Adams and John Hancock, who were staying at a house in Lexington….” If the leaders would have been caught that would mean they would be killed for treason against Britain. Therefor that would give the Colonists fear to stand up and fight for freedom. Which would mean the United States of America would most likely still be under British rule.
By the fall of 1775, “the British were occupying Boston and the young Continental Army was holed up in Cambridge,” short on ammunition (“Gadsden Flag History”). In October, private letters were sent to the Second Continental Congress “that informed them that the British government was sending two ships to America loaded with arms and gunpowder for the British troops” (Gadsden Flag History). It was then decided that the colonies needed the ammunition more than the British, so a plan was devised to
The colonists was throwing snowballs and had no other way to protect themselves. On the other hand the Redcoats had to protect themselves also. Based on other sources I was given in multiple court trials the court room discussed what happened in the Boston Massacre. It was both the colonists and the redcoats fault.
Just as England moved troops to occupy New York, they also moved troops to Boston, which ultimately led to the most infamous incidents of the revolution called the Boston Massacre. In the Boston Massacre, British soldiers took arms and killed five members of an unruly and potentially dangerous mob. With the tensions occurring during that time and the added presence of troops made events like the Boston Massacre hard to avoid. Although the massacre was tragic but not without great gain, it gave the Americans the opportunity to show all men are equal and have the right to a fair trial. This was shown when John Adams defended the British soldiers during the Massacre trials although he had ties to the Sons of Liberty.
The Continental Army just simply charged after the militia did a fake retreat. In the article The Patriot Film Fact or Fiction: Battles it says, “In the movie the Continental regulars and Colonel Burwell were waiting in reserve behind the rise, rather than retreating to that position during battle as really happened. After seeing the militia retreating, the British had broken discipline in anticipation of a rout, but when they came over the rise, they found themselves double-flanked. This all is pretty close to what happens in the movie”.