When I read books, I always tend to go for ones that are based on reality. For example, books that are based on a person’s experience during a war would be something that would catch my eye at a library. In The Good Earth, written by Pearl S. Buck, the author puts you right in the book with farmer Wang Lung. With her words, you can picture yourself back in China in the early twentieth century. She tells the story of his life as a poor farmer. The theme surrounding the novel is the power of land. Buck stresses its importance throughout the book by bringing it up time and time again. In fact, Wang Lung shows its importance by saying, “Sell their land!” repeated Wang Lung, convinced. “Then indeed are they growing poor. Land is one’s flesh and blood” (52). Land is what signified one’s wealth and kept a family alive. Without land, they couldn’t sell crops for money, have money for food or clothes or even shelter, and they wouldn’t even be able to grow their own food. …show more content…
She shows the reader how all over China, the language and culture is expressed differently. For example, in the north, where Wang lives, it’s mostly country and the language is spoken “...slow and deep and it wells from the throat” (107). While in the south “...the people spoke in syllables which splintered from their lips and from the ends of their tongues” (107). In the north, crops grew slow and there were harvests twice a year. In the south, crops were urged and men forced them to grow quicker with fertilizer. The differences were proven to be quite a challenge when Wang first came to the south and Buck made sure to show that while also explaining what it was that challenged him. She gives great detail in telling how the north and south
Between 1800 and 1850, the North and South had grown distinctively different, but they also had some similarities. Some of the differences & similarities between the North and South included the economy, social attitudes & structures, and daily life. The North and the South had farmers and everyone including children worked on the family farms. As time went by, the North became more industrialized and manufacturing became the center point of their economy rather than agriculture. Factories popped up all along the east coast and the inland waterways.
The North had a Industrial economy with lots of railroads and many more machines to make work more efficient. The South had a Agricultural economy with lots of cash crops such as tobacco, rice, indigo, and most money making crop, cotton. The southwestern area made more
The reason behind the difference in economies is because of the wide range of soil and land in each region. The land in the South was more fertile and prosperous than the North. Since there was more swampy land in the South where rice was cultivating the reliability for slaves in colonies like Georgia and South Carolina were more present. The reasoning behind the use of slaves was not just because of the fact that whites could order them to do so, it was also for the fact that
Northern farmers grew many different types of crops. Where Southern farmers only grew one “cash” crop. This caused the development to change because when the North had extra food they would send it to the west indies where they only grew tobacco or cotton they needed food so they got it from the North. In the South the farmers had huge farms called plantations. In the North the farmers had smaller
In the south, they had cities, but mostly for trade. The main crop was cotton, which was hard to harvest. From the text in chapter 9, “the economy of the South prospered between 1820, and 1860. Unlike the industrial North, however, the South remained predominantly rural.” From this text, it could be said that the north had a better industry, but the South lead in farming.
Due to the North's climate and geography they couldn't grow cash crops like the South could. They Couldn't plant cash crops because the grounds up North were more rocky than the South. The weather also was a struggle because they had cold snowy winters and warm summers which didn't allow them to grow crops year around like southern states could. In the south their grounds and conditions were opposite to the North. They didn't have rocky soil so they could plant more.
The North centered its focus on manufacturing and industry. Whereas, the South valued slavery and farming. According to the chart in Document 2, “Yearly Value of Manufactured Goods North: $ 1,500,000,000, and the South: $155,000,000 “. As shown the North was making way more money in the years, while the South was making approximately $1,345,000,000 less dollars than the North. In addition according to Document 1 it states, “ There were way more railroads in the North than in the South.
In the Southern colonies, climate and landscape were perfect, making for many plantations. It was full of indentured servants and slaves whereas The North had no or very few slaves and indentured servants. The North and South were like two diverse worlds, their climate, landscape, religion,
The South was able to produce 7/8 of the worlds cotton supply. The South became more dependent on the planted field system and it’s full of force part, slavery. Notably, at that moment, the North was flourishing industrially. The North depended on factories and others
There were many differences between the North and the South. For instance, the South were very agricultural as opposed to the North which were industrial. The South used cheap labor in the form of slaves, whereas the North had workers do their jobs in factories at a faster pace. Because of sectionalism, competition between the north and the south began to increase.
The north and the south had many differences based on their economy. The main thing that set them apart was their difference in climates. Document one says that the South had climate ideal for agriculture while the North was not able to grow crops year round. Because of this, the North leaned more towards industry and all of this lead to the clear difference between their economies. Since their economies were so different, their workforce was also.
The South grew cotton, spices, tobacco and sugarcane. The South had the materials, but did very little manufacturing compared to the North in which they relied upon to manufacture their
Jing-Mei was immersed in American culture as she attended school every day, as opposed to her parents who were both born and raised in China. As a young adult who experienced two cultures, the barrier (including language and culture) between Jing-Mei and her parents contributed to “vigorous [denial] that [she] had any Chinese whatsoever below [her] skin” (Tan 147). Still, her mother was convinced that Jing-Mei would eventually come to “feel and think Chinese” (Tan 147). Although she disagreed with what her mother said, Jing-Mei knew deep inside that she was right, frequently realizing the tendencies she had that were so alike to her mother. She listed that “haggling with store owners, pecking her mouth with a toothpick in public, being color-blind to the fact that lemon yellow and pale pink are not good combinations for winter clothes” were some of the things that her mother did that the naive fifteen-year-old Jing-Mei identified with being Chinese.
The north has Bad farmland therefore they didn't have great agriculture. South has great farmland which meant they had a very good economy for agriculture and cash crops and much more. Secound was there various differences in the economy of the North and South. In the North for economy their was immigrants,textiles,cotton, and
This presents a development of characterisation when we meet Ling in the first paragraph of the extract. The description of Ling’s wife follows straight after. In the second paragraph , we encounter Wang-Fô whom inspired Ling to have a new perspective of the world as “Ling avait grandi dans une maison d’où la richesse éliminait les hasards.” The passage is written in an omniscient third person narrative. It is predominantly narrative