More than 40 years ago a pension was the best form of assurance for a financially happy life after retiring. In 2016, the Central States Pension Fund forecasted that it will run out of money in the near future. To potentially stop the fund from running out of money, it has proposed cuts to current and future pension payments. These cuts will affect not only thousands of workers, but could affect millions. As the director of the Central States Pension Fund it would be best to push for cuts on pension payments. When the nation first learned of possible cuts it caused an uproar. Many felt betrayed and others felt as if all their hard work was useless. By cutting the pension payments, the Central States Pension Funds will be breaking a promise …show more content…
These cuts are ethically right, but also ethically wrong because they go against the principle of utilitarian benefits and religious injunction. Utilitarian benefits is set to make sure that the greatest good is done for the greatest number of people. To take away pension benefits, the fund is putting workers in a financially unstable position. This is unethical because it is hurting instead of helping a lot of workers. Not only would the benefits cuts affect thousands, but could also influence other pension plans to cut benefit which in result would hurt millions of workers. The Central States Pension Fund has a lot of influence, because it is a major plan. By cutting benefits, other plans will also find it acceptable to cut benefits. The number of people affected would grow from thousands to millions. This in turn hurts the greatest number of people instead of helping them. By hurting thousands workers, the fund is also doing an action that is unkind. This goes against the ethical principle of religious injunction. Religious junction is to never take an action that is unkind to another. The pension cuts are unkind, because it breaks the promise that Central States Pension Fund had established with their stakeholders. They had promised pension holders that when they retired they would receive all the money they had taken out over the years for their pension. Pension holders feel betrayed, because they are now losing years of hard work and hope for a financially stable life after retirement. The action of cutting benefits in unkind, because it breaks a promise to the pension holders. The ethical principles of utilitarian benefits and religious injunction help to show that the Central States Pension Fund proposal of cutting benefits is both ethically wrong and ethically
As Saskatchewan goes into a more detrimental deficit, the provincial government is starting to look for possible ways to regulate this shortfall. Alongside of raising taxes and other expenses, Premier Brad Wall has decided to make budget cuts to the education sector. Although it may benefit the province, plenty of students and teachers will have to suffer for it to do so. Teacher’s spend their own money when it comes to classroom supplies, and put more effort in their job than most other professions. By Saskatchewan’s government cutting the budget for education, there will be a shortage of job opportunities for recent graduates, a lower graduation rate for students, and an unsustainable wage for teachers.
Under the Harper government, hundreds of federal research facilities and programs, have faced cuts to their budgets or been shut down, facing outrage from scientists, politicians and Canadians alike. In six years the Harper government dismissed more than 20000 scientists and aided in the closing of hundreds of programs, ranging from climate change to ocean toxicity to public health. Despite these cuts, the office of the Minister of State for Science and Technology has stated “Our government has made record investments in science… We are working to strengthen partnerships to get more ideas from the lab to the marketplace and increase our wealth of knowledge” (CBC 1). Many of the scientific community cite these cuts to a refocusing of government,
The Canadian Pension Plan is an income based public pension in which transfers income from workers to be retired, and covers all Canadians workers; except those in Quebec, who are covered by the Quebec Pension Plan. The Canadian Pension Plan was created through federal-provincial negotiations in 1965, as a response to growing poverty among retired Canadians. With the Canadian Pension Plan, the average annual Pension received by a retiring, 65 year old person at the end of 2016, was $7, 728; versus a possible maximum of $13, 368. Pearson had enacted the Pension plan as a way of making retirement accessible, without the poverty, stress, and pain that retired workers went through. Lester Pearson, when enacting the Canadian Pension Plan, took what his people were going through to heart, and made retirement almost effortless in hopes that Canadians could retire with less
According to New York Times (1992), reported specifically on the statement given by the then president, William Clinton’s decision to end TANF, SNAP, and SSI as a result it encourages dependency. Beyond that, Clinton and additional people which are in favor of striking amendment on ending welfare advocates for reform because dependency on welfares causes social ills, enhancing teenage pregnancy, crime, low labor-market attendance between racial and ethnic minorities (O’Connor, 2000). Other than that, the reconciliation Act (1996), (PRWORA, 110 stat.2015), codified on the ills of welfare dependency of the needy parents on the government benefits. The potential perception of dependency contributed to the stigmatization surrounding welfare
There are thousands of people in the world who oppose the idea of age based healthcare rationing. Some believe that if we ration healthcare based on age, that it would take away rights and justices from the elderly population (scu.edu). Like mentioned in the article by Claire Andrea and Manuel Velasquez, “Aged-Based Health Care Rationing”, when people refer to the justice part, they believe that everyone should be treated similarly unless there are rules or morals presented that require them to be treated differently. Yes, everyone should be treated equally, but healthcare rationing is not going to treat people differently, only the medical resources would be rationed. Andrea and Velasquez make a good point in the article, they say by rationing medical resources it would increase the economic productivity of the young, making it more beneficial for the whole world.
The phrase is a throwback from Robert Menzies and in this context was used by Joe Hockey, as a bludgeon against the perceived "leaner 's" in Australia, or more specifically people who are either underemployed or unemployed and are receiving some level of government benefits. This of course compares to the "lifters", which refers to people who contribute in some way to investment and economic growth. The speech given by Joe Hockey, was a continuation of and application of the coalitions perceived 'debt and deficit crisis ' and more broadly can be a viewed as an attack on the nation 's most vulnerable and poorest. Some of the proposals put forward by Joe Hockey include, but are not limited to: an increase in the pension age eligibility, tougher income tests for self-funded retirees to received commonwealth seniors health cards, $7 GP co-payments, billions slashed from hospitals, university fee deregulation, 6 month waiting periods for people under 30 applying for the dole and tightened eligibility criteria for disability support pensioners. The values and principles that Joe Hockey and his ilk
Final Thesis The Baby Boomer era has decreased since War War 1, leaving mostly the government and Canadians distress about how this event will impact societies economy and the debts our generation has to pay. Supporting argument #1 With the peak in births during the Baby Boomer era, this has resulted in financial instability within society. Supporting argument #2 Society as a whole is experience difficulties managing the effects of the aging Baby Boomers. Introduction During the 1947 to 1965, about 76.4 million children were born, this phenomenon was eventually labeled as the Baby Boom (Canadian Encyclopedia).
As a society we need to accept that it is up to our generation to fix this issue. Reforming Social Security will benefit everyone living in the U.S. in the long run. Restoring Social Security to its once former glory is a necessity to benefit our further generations and to create a better future for the next generation of workers. In order to accomplish this lofty goal I propose that we increase the payroll tax cap to boost Social Security’s funding and reduce benefits for the higher income earners who do not need Social Security as much as others do. The majority of Social Security’s income originates from the Social Security payroll tax.
Literature review: spending of government sometimes cannot be stimulative because the government each money may be one dollar can injects to the tax that comes in economy or it is borrow in the future out of the economy. Tax rebates not always help the economy to increase because it comes under government grants and they do not encourage productivity Federal spending is considered as out of control and can grow faster when they are projected in the future that can burdens Americans and making future saddle foe generations with a massive, and cannot be affordable debt. It is necessary that congress should cut current spending and can save for future through entitlement reforms. It can be achievable by not raising taxes and assuring the grants
Harry Markham’s Loyalty Dilemma Markham was hired as an investment advisor to give advice on the state pension fund. He has concerned about the pension funds running out of money due to the liability risk associated with the higher values that were not being reported (Walsh,2016). The problem is that how can Markham give good advice on investments decisions to his clients when they don’t want to hear a negative report. He has live up to his moral obligation which is to be honest and trustworthy to his clients and all other parties when it involves investment decisions (Northouse, 2016, p.346). 1.)
Austerity policy is not good in the current situation, because it could cause revolution, increasing unemployment, decreasing GDP,export and government cannot afford money on education, so poor people became not to be able to go to school. I think austerity policy is for when country is in a good time, not recession. (Pettinger, 2013). Stimulus policy is much better than austerity policy though there is some problem. It leads to increase GDP, inflation, economic growth and decrease unemployment.
In this matter, representative of social security claim companies should be careful as this claim solution is the right of some deserving persons. So, companies should observe the communal positions of people to maintain this matter with appropriate sources. (Bevan, The Rise and Fall of Marks and Spencer: And How It Rose Again, 2007) Accordingly, those people who are using unfair method to claim social security benefits should be discouraged because provision of financial rights to deserving persons is an apt way of accomplishment in social and communal scenarios.
Leaving unemployment insurance systems the way they are will help protect the economy and its
8–1. Internet Case—CalPERS. While the examples in this chapter have focused on a single-employer plan, many states operate statewide plans, referred to as Public Employee Retirement Systems (PERS), to which multiple employers contribute. One of the largest PERS plans in the nation is operated in the State of California. Required to answer the following questions use the Web site found at www.calpers.ca.gov.
Hon’ble Judge of the Supreme Court of India Gajendra Gadker J1. , while delivering a judgment pointed out that “the concept of social justice is an essential postulate of the rule of law and it gives special significance to the idea of a welfare state”. The Constitution enshrines the concept of Social Justice as one of the objects of state policy and the principles enunciated in “Directive Principles of State Policy” are fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making special laws for achieving the goals of Social Justice and an egalitarian society and thus “Reservations” have become major part of the Constitution and its Policy and has become National Policy also since enactment of the Constitution for the last 55 years. But the recent Judgment of the Supreme court pertaining to