Did you know that the electoral college believes that popular votes do not determine the winner but their votes also matter? In the Electoral College system, they indirectly chose the president and vice president. Each state gets to vote only once. To win you need 270 votes. Should we get rid of the electoral college? I believe that the reason why the public should get rid of the Electoral College is that it is a biased system, and this system is the opposite of equality. It can be argued that there are many reasons why we should get rid of the Electoral College. The first reason is the Electoral College has a biased system. From the source of George C. Edwards, in his take on why the Electoral College is Bad for America, in 2004 he quotes, …show more content…
My second and last point would be that this system contradicts the idea of equality for citizens. According to a chart created from various sources in the years 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016 from Document G, it shows all the popular votes and Electoral votes, from all those years the person who won the most popular votes still lost to the Electoral votes. It shows that the winner was determined by the electoral votes so it makes the popular votes not look as important as the electoral votes. This quote supports my thesis by showing how the popular votes from the people are not important and valued as much as the electoral votes. This makes them almost seem as useless so it isn't supporting the idea of equality in their system. Furthermore, from a chart created from various sources in the years 1980 and 1992, Document B shows Electoral votes gave 0% of voting under every independent party but the votes with the most votes were republicans and democrats. This chart supports my thesis because it shows the Electoral system is not making all teams equal. Favoring democrats and republicans and giving independent teams no chance over their biased opinion proving that their system of theirs doesn't show equally in the voting. In conclusion, this information written supports my argument that the system of the Electoral College is contradicting the idea of
The United States has benefited from the Electoral College for hundreds of years. This essay will discuss the presidential voting process and the merits of the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a more effective method of choosing the president than the general election. This is due to the fact that it greatly improves efficiency and ensures the integrity of the election. There would be a huge number of candidates to pick from if the Electoral College did not exist and we had a public vote instead.
Did you know that in two out of the last five U.S. presidential elections, the candidate who won the popular vote did not win the presidency? Now, to explore the question, Should We Abolish the Electoral College? The very system that defies the will of the majority. This question is often being thought about as the Electoral College has what some may argue advantages and perks, but it does have its downsides and what some may argue flaws. We will be exploring on why the current Electoral College should be left alone, as it does not allow the majority to always get their way, it ensures that all parts of a country is involved in the election and that candidates will serve the entire country, and lastly, the Electoral College creates a compromise between popular vote and congressional choice.
The Electoral College is a system that has been used in the United States to choose its President and Vice President. It involves a group of electors chosen by each state who cast their votes on behalf of the citizens of their respective states. The candidate who receives a majority of the electoral votes, at least 270 out of 538, becomes the President of the United States. While some people argue that the Electoral College system is outdated and should be replaced with an alternative method, I firmly believe that it is the best system for our nation. My position statement is that the Electoral College system should be retained as it is the best way to elect the President and Vice President of the United States.
The US’s Electoral College has always been a controversial topic. When it was written into the Constitution, it was meant as a compromise between the small and large states, and between Congress and the states (M. West). Since then, the Electoral College system has been how the United States elected its presidents. However, it continues to face criticism and many want the system to change, favoring systems such as a national popular vote instead (National Conference of State Legislatures). Despite how the US’s Electoral College effectively balances power between the states and the federal government, it is still a deeply flawed voting system due to it being based on unrealistic expectations and outdated ideals that should be changed to reflect
While there are valid arguments against the Electoral College, it remains a vital component of the American political system. One significant criticism of the Electoral College is that it increases the likelihood of a political candidate securing the presidency without receiving a large majority of the vote. Given this, people must remember why the founding fathers proposed the Electoral College. It was a way to ensure that all states, not just the ones with the most people, have a say in the election (Kirch). Without the Electoral College, candidates will be slightly more motivated to run for office in less populated states because such states' challenges and needs will likely go unmet.
The United States Electoral College is a system that has been in place since the country's founding, and it has been the subject of much debate and controversy over the years. Some argue that the Electoral College is outdated and should be replaced with a popular vote system, while others believe that it serves an important purpose in the American political system. The electoral college has lead to fair and democratic elections for over 200 years, removing it would ruin fair elections, lead to less voter participation and could even lead to more corrupt leaders. The Electoral College provides power to small states and swing states.
The Electoral College was created by the founding fathers, founders who have nothing in common with us today and did not experience the same social milieu having digressed from that of their time (pattern 9, 12, 21). While many Americans likely blanch at the possibility of altering tradition and are tenacious toward change, we have no obligation to maintain this system, and keeping it on this basis is a banal, hackneyed excuse (list 6, 8, 9,
Until now, citizens cannot vote directly for their president that breaks democratic principles and obscures presidential politics. But, are these arguments enough to prove that the winner-take-all principle of the Electoral College be abolished even if it has proved that it has worked well in this century having no election of the president that has been decided in the House of Representatives? The winner-take-all principle of the Electoral College is used in most states and in the District of Columbia except in Maine and Nebraska. This principle means that in a state, the candidate who has the majority or the plurality of the popular vote gets all the electoral votes of the state. This principle, then, does not guarantee that whoever wins the nationwide popular vote, is sure to be elected as the president for the Electoral College determines the winner of the election.
In a twenty-first century environment, the Electoral College is unfair. Caroline Jenkins makes this case against the Electoral College: In testimony before Congress in 1997, the League of Women Voters pointed out that apart from the public outcry that would be caused by circumvention of the popular will, there are a number of other serious flaws in the Electoral College system. The Electoral College system is fundamentally unfair to voters. In a nation where voting rights are grounded in the one-person, one-vote principle, the Electoral College is a hopeless anachronism.
The Electoral College should come to an end because it disregards the popular vote, it was built on racism and sexism, and it creates a power imbalance between electors. Many people may think that the Electoral College helps out voting system. However, people's votes don't count, which creates a false sense of security. The Founding Fathers were some of the greatest men in history, right? Wrong.
All through the history of the United States of America, many people have discussed the abolishment of the Electoral College. For many reasons, some believe it is what makes our country have the type of government we have, some believe that it's what limits the power of the government, and many people such as Mitch McConnell believes it is what gives us our freedom and prosperity. While these are valid arguments there is a multitude of reasons to why the electoral college should be abolished. Such as there is only a need for twelve states in order to become the president, popular vote of the people for president can still lose, and the Swing states are given too much power and attention compared to that of the other states. This is why I believe in the abolishment of the Electoral College.
The Electoral College is an outdated system and should be abolished before it turns the tables of an election for the bad. This system of voting was developed in 1787 and has had a strong impact on American citizens for 230 years. The Electoral College was created to take power from over populated states and distribute it to the less populated states. It also serves a higher authority than the popular vote, which can alter the results of many elections. In the 230 years of this system being in action, 4 elections have been modified to set the victor as someone who the population did not want.
To What Extent Should the United States Restructure its Electoral College System? : States With the 2016 election in the books, the United States has elected a candidate that lost the popular vote by over two million votes. This is the second time in the twenty first century that this has occurred. In such a democratic nation, the ability to win the important office of the presidency without popular consent raises a few concerns about the two hundred and forty year old system. In a democracy, the voices of the states and their respective populations must be heard.
Generations to come, ponder the ideology of: Should the Electoral College continue to hold the power of electing the President of the United States? The process of appointing electors varies by state, but generally, political parties nominate electors at their state conventions. Each state is allocated electoral votes equal to its total number of representatives in Congress. The Electoral College provides each state with a certain number of electors based on its representation in Congress, which combines the proportional representation of the House of Representatives with the equal representation of the Senate; Aiming to prevent the dominance of more populous states over smaller ones. The Electoral College is an effective form of campaigning for the next president as it’s consistent, balances regional interests, and it preserves federalism.
The Electoral College system assures balanced power between the states, puts the independent parties under control, grants balanced voting, and supports the major political parties. The Electoral College has proven itself to be very sufficient in determining the president and the vice president of the United States. Since this system has been successful since our Founding Fathers created it, there should be no reason as to why we should get rid of the Electoral