ipl-logo

The Stanford Prison Experiment Vs A Few Good Men

983 Words4 Pages

In society, the people with more power are likely on a higher level than those who have less power. A person who is given orders has the right to decide whether to follow them or not, and this idea is clearly the situation from reading “The Perils of Obedience,” “The Stanford Prison Experiment,” and watching “A Few Good Men.” At the end of the film, why did the two marines not have to go back to jail, but were no longer allowed to be Marines? Why was their case pardoned from prison sentencing? In the article of “The Perils of Obedience”, written by Stanley Milgram, the experimenter explains that the experiment is to see how far a person could hurt a victim in a situation where he is ordered to do so. Also, in the article “The Stanford Prison …show more content…

He says Jessup admitted that he ordered a “Code Red.” In his mind, he thinks he does not have to take the responsibility for what they have done as long as it was an order. But that is not the case. They should have questioned the order and protected Santiago instead of following their superior’s order. They both could have lost honor from their fellow Marines and citizens if they did not follow the order. However, the main cause of his death was due to his bad health condition, but the blame was placed on the marines. The marines were punished for their actions accordingly. This film depicts the obedience of soldiers in the …show more content…

However, when it was Gretchen Brandts’ turn, she turned to the experimenter saying “Well, sorry, I don’t think we should continue” when the learner complains after the administration of 210 volts. However the experimenter says that the experiment requires that she has to go on. Brandt says she does not want to hurt him because he has a heart condition, and she “doesn’t want to be responsible for anything happening to him.” She’s willing to stop so the experiment was terminated. This woman is courageous and is brave enough to stop the experiment because she does not want to hurt others and takes responsibility for them. She is resolute throughout the fact so she was able to stop the experiment. She wants to stop no matter how much the experimenter told her she must continue, while other teachers obeyed the words of the experimenter which led them to continue. Brandt did what she thought was right. One of the male teachers does not show any emotion while hurting the learner because what he did was an

Show More
Related

  • Did Frank Trenker Face Justice For His Actions

    620 Words  | 3 Pages

    When you work in the Army, you do not have much of a choice when you are given an order, which makes it hard to define what actions from troops in the Army are the result of just following orders and what actions are ultimately their willful decision. In the book Gentlehands by M.E. Kerr, we can judge whether we believe Frank Trenker, also known as Gentlehands, should face justice for his actions as an SS Nazi soldier or if he should be left alone in peace. Mr. Trenker, like almost all Nazi soldiers at the time, killed millions of innocent people. He also lied on a legal document upon entrance to America. What sets his case apart is that he committed acts that were beyond his orders, such as tormenting his prisoners.

    Read More

  • Black Hearts By Jim Frederick Sparknotes

    1230 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Effective Military Leader Warrant Officer Romero, Philip T. SPC: Captain Dearth, 1st Platoon The book “Black Hearts One Platoons Descent into Madness in Iraq’s Triangle of Death” by Jim Frederick is a true story about multiple leadership failures and six United States Soldiers from 1st Platoon, Bravo Company, 1st Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division who were convicted for their involvement in horrible crimes while deployed to Iraq. The horrific acts including rape as well as murder committed by the soldiers of 1st platoon were a direct result of poor military leadership. Bad leadership will corrupt any military unit.

    Read More

  • The Case Of Lance Corporal Dawson And Pfc.

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    Due to their actions they will be charged for First degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and Conduct Unbecoming a United States Marine, which will lead to at least 20 years in jail. A basic argument from another lawyer would be that Corporal Dawson and Pfc. Downey were ordered to by Lt. Kendrick to do “code red” on Pfc. Santiago, but that argument would lead to Corporal Dawson, Pfc. Downey, Lt. Kendrick and Colonel Jessop being charged as well.

    Read More

  • Casualties In The Battle Of Iwo Jima

    563 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Battle of Iwo Jima there were over 40,000 casualties on both sides of the field (World Book Online). The Battle of Iwo Jima was one of the most-bloodiest battles of World War II. The Battle of Iwo Jima was fought by the United States and Japan. The Japanese use Guerrilla fighting tactics (Smith, Larry). The Battle of Iwo Jima was a turning point for the United States in World War II.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Following Orders

    371 Words  | 2 Pages

    Refusing or not or not doing an order precisely as given indicates an unwillingness to compromise for the general good of the unit shows self centered decisions and selfishly motivated that a successful military member should not have. Every order in any circumstance is important, so long as it’s not unlawful, and has

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo

    751 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1971, Philip Zimbardo set out to conduct an experiment to observe behavior as well as obedience. In Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment, many dispute whether it was obedience or merely conforming to their predesigned social roles of guards and prisoners that transpired throughout the experiment. Initially, the experiment was meant to test the roles people play in prison environment; Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards, disposition, or had more to do with the prison environment. This phenomenon has been arguably known to possibly influencing the catastrophic similarities which occurred at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.The

    Read More

  • What Was The American Peiper's Trial

    1021 Words  | 5 Pages

    It is the winter of 1944, and 84 Americans lie dead in s field by the town of Malmedy. These were the men of Battery B, who were slaughtered by the tank formation of Kampfgruppe Peiper. A man by the name of Joachim Peiper would later be tried for the death of these men and found guilty. He would later be lease on the premise that the trial was unfair. Though Joachim Peiper was released from his sentence, it is commonly known that Peiper was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of innocent people and should have been punished.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment

    810 Words  | 4 Pages

    Since the beginning of the human existence, man has always dominated and ruled over one another be it empires, corporations, or small groups. Authority and obedience has always been a factor of who we are. This natural occurrence can be seen clearly through the psychological experiments known as The Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. Both of these studies are based on how human beings react to authority figures and what their obedience is when faced with conflict.

    Read More

  • Gentleman Your Verdict Analysis

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Gentleman, Your Verdict”: A Moral Dilemma 1. In my opinion, I don’t think the jury should convict Commander Oram of murder because he wanted at least some people to survive and to do that, many men had to die. The fact that he commits suicide makes a difference because if he hadn’t it would have made it look like he killed 15 other men so that he could survive. If he hadn’t commit suicide, I would definitely change my answer to ‘yes, he is guilty’. I don’t think that the other crew members are guilty because they didn’t have a say in what was done.

    Read More

  • Essay On Stanford Prison Experiment

    599 Words  | 3 Pages

    On day six Zimbardo and Milgram decided to conclude the experiment. Zimbardo originally intended to explore how prisoners adapt to powerlessness, but he has contended that the experiment demonstrates how swiftly arbitrary assignment of power can lead to abuse. (Maher, The anatomy of obedience. P. 408) Once the experiment was completed Zimbardo and Milgram concluded that generally people will conform to the roles they are told to play.

    Read More

  • Joining The Military Essay

    1363 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Uniform Code of Military Justice does not compare to civilian law. Because it deals with the safety of the nation, it has to be even more strict and detailed. Conscious efforts to leave base camp and endangering fellow soldiers should not be taken lightly. Bowe Bergdahl did not hesitate to tell Mark Boal, the interviewer, that he had mindfully planned the best time to walk away from site. According to Bowe, the sole purpose of this decision was to bring attention to the errors happening within his base.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not

    746 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stanford Experiment: Unethical or Not Stanford Prison Experiment is a popular experiment among social science researchers. In 1973, a psychologist named Dr. Philip Zimbardo wants to find out what are the factors that cause reported brutalities among guards in American prisons. His aim was to know whether those reported brutalities were because of the personalities of the guards or the prison environment. However, during the experiment, things get muddled unexpectedly. The experiment became controversial since it violates some ethical standards while doing the research.

    Read More

  • 'Authority In All Quiet On The Western Front'

    1117 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the novel, there is definite control that the authority has over the soldiers, one that trained them, but also repressed them, turning the soldiers into empty shells of war. In the film, however, there is a rather unusual absence of authority in the lives of the soldiers. They are told once or twice in the beginning what to do and how to do it but other than that the soldiers are free to do what they want. This lack of authority may have been the root cause of some poorly judged actions that the soldiers take. For instance when Paul and Kat go to find the goose for the second time but because of Paul’s poor judgment, Kat is killed by a kid.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment: Can Normal People Behaving Evil?

    858 Words  | 4 Pages

    Normal People Behaving Evil The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment to see if normal people would change their behavior in a role-play as a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was conducted by Dr.Philip Zimbardo in 1973 at Stanford University that caused numerous amount of trauma to prisoners by prison guards in their role-playing position which forced Dr. Zimbardo to officially terminate the experiment six days after it was introduced. Due to the cruel aggressive behaviors from the guards, the experiment led to a question, "Do "normal" people have the capability of behaving badly?" The answer to that question is that most likely an individual who behave normally will have the capability of expressing evil behavior due to the environment that they are surrounded.

    Read More

  • Ethical Decisions In Crimson Tide

    442 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the movie Crimson Tide, we look to the question ethical decisions, and what someone would do when thrown into a situation that made them question themselves, and who they serve for. In this example, when serving in the United States Military, once a solider is given orders, that solider must follow the orders out and not to question them. The trust between the solider and the higher command giving orders is almost based on blind faith. The solider relies on the higher commands decision of protecting democracy, even if someone, or a lot of people are killed. Is it an ethical decision to follow a commander’s order even if it means killing mass numbers of innocent civilians?

    Read More

More about The Stanford Prison Experiment Vs A Few Good Men

Open Document