Kathleen Parker’s article entitled “Tea Party has Steeped too Long for the Nation’s Good” is a admonishment of the Tea-Party for their failure (specifically through John Boehner) to raise the debt-ceiling. Parker’s motive behind this article is to convince the public of the kind of poltical dangers the Tea-Party presents and of the need to oust it from government. To do this, Parker employs blistering, cynical, admonitory tone behind her rhetoric, complaining of the Tea-Party’s hubris and incompetence, in general. But while the technical failings of the Tea-Party are clear in Parker’s opinion piece, what is more apparent are the character flaws of the party, itself. A further analysis of contents to this article will make this point clearer. …show more content…
In short, the party’s use of power to avoid passing the amendment seems to be less concerned with the public interest and more with fulfilling their own agenda. This is Parker’s crucial concern, underlying her amonishment of the Tea-Party in general. -------- But Parker tries to get the reader to share this concern mostly by speaking to the audience in an angered tone, adopting harsh, jugmental rhetoric towards the Tea Party. For instance, Parker makes her stance on the Tea Party very clear from the start of the article. Parker writes how “The behavior of certain Republicans who call themselves tea party conservatives makes them the most destructive posse of misguided ‘patriots’ we 've seen in recent memory.” Parker further adds how “These people wouldn 't recognize a hot fudge sundae if the cherry started talking to them.”
Frank Rich maintains a critical tone throughout the entire article. His use of short sentences such as “Actually, no. People don’t change” and the word “minions” to describe Hilary Clinton in the first section shows his discontent with the candidate. Rich continues his critical tone as he discusses the other candidates. The use of words such as “bigoted”, “cowering”, and “off-the-wall” show that Rich is angry at the majority of the candidates.
Through the effective use of rhetorical tools and the arrangement of this essay, Chen tries to tell her audience that the Immigration Reform Act has been the year’s most feared, least effective, most popular, and most hated legislative discussion in Washington (Chen, para. 1). Chen portrays her high competence on the subject of Immigration Reform by concentrating her introduction on purposely appealing to her audience. By controlling the rhetorical distance between herself and the readers she develops a relationship and establishes her authority, while not portraying herself as a superior. She establishes her credibility and portrays her scholarly credit through her citations of literature and quotations from other experts. She then establishes
Some call him a radical; others see him as a patriot, an advocate for 21st century individual responsibility and independence. Fox News was given the opportunity to profile this reclusive American patriot. With no strings attached, no holds barred, I was offered full and exclusive access into the mind of a truly great thinker and conservative activist. Here, tonight, a fair and balanced look at Edward Birch and The Movement.”
The United States, it is often thought, was born in rebellion. This is the story reinforced by the Declaration of Independence, and it’s the story promoted by the first elected officials of this country. America has been a nation of protestors -- be it protest against Britain, “savages,” heathens, police, abortion, racism, or taxes -- since its inception. According to the early 19th century Transcendentalists, however, the greatest battle before Americans is the battle for one’s very soul. Dean Grodzins is a Harvard-educated historian, and a visiting scholar at the Massachusetts Historical Society specializing in mid-19th century American history.
In the excerpt from “The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform”, John Samples argues that the passing of the McCain-Feingold Act is no means for celebration. Samples argues that money and Freedom of Speech, as well as other rights enunciated in the Constitution, are intertwined. Samples begins by examining the purposes of the McCain-Feingold Act. Although the law itself explains little about its purposes and the “special interest” influences it tried to reduce, supporters of the Act expected the law to accomplish many purposes. These purposes include curbing special interests, such as stopping the use of soft money as a means of buying influence, ending the appearance of corruption, and reducing some kinds of political advertising, such as issue ads, which target particular candidates in an attempt to influence the outcome of an election.
Smith institutes very indignant and zealous diction when challenging the Democratic Administration on their lack of quality leadership in the past and present day, and also when challenging her own political group to not follow in the hypocrisy. Her word choice when describing the Democratic Administration includes, “a mania for loose spending and loose programs,”, “rapidly losing,”, “confused,”, “contradictory,”, “greatly lost”, “complacency to,”, “suffer”, and “ineffective”. All of these in context, Smith implements to discredit the Democratic Regime because of their overall failure to properly take care of their country and its people. Smith appeals to pathos through her diction, in how it galvanized guilt and humiliation in the Senators
In court today, the issue was whether John Winthrop and the Puritans should be honored as Founders of American Freedom or if their religious practices in the enforcement of laws restricted the citizen's freedom. The prosecution was not in favor of honoring John Winthrop and the Puritans because although the Puritans settled in America first, the Founding Fathers in 1776 established true freedom. However, the defense believes that Puritans should be honored because they mastered the combination of religion and liberty, in addition to association and self-government in order to establish freedom. I believe the Puritans were the true founders and should be honored because they did establish life, liberty (although a small amount), and property
Vote or Die Prompt #5: How does an idea presented violate or challenge your ways of thinking? Will Durst, a political satirist and comedian, seems to urge the reader to commit political actions on pain of social disaster in his short article “Happy National Apathy Day”, by providing a list of sarcastic reasoning for why one shouldn’t head to the polls on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. Durst reminds us that “You won 't be forced from your bed and dragged to the polls against your will” (para 1). However, it’s hard to tell whether Durst is directly satirizing Americans’ low voter turnout or plying his trade as a comedian, with the article being a pastiche of those who believe that America’s problems are caused by not enough
Boston Tea Party Most of the population had heard or been told about the historical backdrop of the Boston Tea Party, when the Americans chose to toss the British Tea into Boston Harbor. Be that as it may, shockingly most of the general population today does not comprehend the significance of it, and why the Boston Tea Party is recalled to this day. The Boston Tea Party has an immense penetrant, effect in the American history because, on the off chance of those few valiant men and acts, America would not be an autonomous country like we are today. It all happened upon the arrival of December 16, 1773, when the American loyalists masked as Mohawk Indians dispatched 342 boxes of tea that belonged the British East India Company from the boats
In the passage from "Civil Disobedience," the author, Thoreau, utilizes rhetorical devices to support his theme. Such devices include tone and diction. The theme expressed in the text is that the government is in need of change and acceptance, not a replacement. The author conveys a serious and professional tone throughout the passage. This helps add more to the seriousness of the subject and theme created which is the government needs change and acceptance, not a replacement.
Throughout his whole essay, Lippmann uses rhetorical strategies to strengthen his opinions of how society views freedom. With the use of interruption in his essay, Lippmann starts his article off by saying, “Were they pressed hard enough, most men would probably confess that political freedom--that is to say, that right to speak freely and to act in opposition--is a noble ideal rather than a practical necessity.” By using dashes in the middle of his sentence, Lipmann starts off with strong opening.
Nathaniel Hawthorne delivers a biased account of the hypocritical actions displayed by Puritanical societies. As a man of faith, Hawthorne knows scripture and religious rules participants are to follow. He argues that the citizens of Boston are hypocritical in their treatment of fellow citizens. They are often portrayed excessively punishing those who are publically disgraced and hiding their own flaws.
Turncoat! Pussy! I felt myself blush. I couldn 't tolerate it. I couldn 't endure the mockery, or the disgrace, or the patriotic ridicule” (O’Brien 59).
In his classic essay, “Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau, spoke about the lack of facts behind voting within the government. Thoreau said, “All voting is a sort of gaming, like checkers or backgammon, with a slight moral tinge to it” (Thoreau p. 22). As a middle-class citizen, Stempel was laughed at by the court for expressing the truth. First-class citizen, Charles Van Doren, however, was revered and praised for finally telling the truth. This verifies Thoreau’s beliefs regarding voting and court situations.
The author immediately appeals to the audience [who, if of legal age, are voters, and thus are especially relevant to the essay] within the first paragraph using reliable information and statistics that reflect the public view of Politicians so as to gain their attention for what they are about to say, and uses this information to relate to the audience in a captivating way. [247] The essay draws attention to how politicians often operate to gain public support for votes to get into a higher position of power, stating that “Instead of seeking to play an informing and educational role, politicians use polling, focus groups, psycho-demographic analysis of the electorate and sophisticated communication strategies to arouse an apathetic public and to manipulate public opinion to gain voter support.”