Do victim precipitation theories mean victim blaming? Explain and evaluate.
1.0 Introduction of victim precipitation
Victim precipitation theories generally involve an explanation of how an individual’s behavior may contribute to his or her own victimization. In future the victim precipitation is behavior by a victim that initiates subsequent behavior of the victimizer and the degree to which victim is responsible for own victimization
Early attempts at studying victim behavior involved the development of typologies that allowed victimol-ogists to determine who was most responsible for the criminal incident offender or victim. For instance,
Wolfgang first introduced the formal concept of victim precipitation in his seminal work on homicide in 1958 when he argued that, in some instances, the victim may initiate the behavior of the victimizer .
Mendelsohn calls the victim and his offender the ‘Penal couple '. The victim offender relationship may contain origin of victimization. The inhibitions and offender may have seemed to change according to the type of qualities the victim possesses. The attitude and behaviour of the victim influences the offender and which makes possible the criminal act.
The willingness of the victim to commit an offence upon him or her makes the offender legally stronger. The consent of the victims whom the law intended to protect encourages the offender. Victim solicitation even more than victim’s consent, confers on the act a kind of legitimacy
* * * I feel that it would be impossible to ensure that there were the safeguards in place to protect society from your possible actions.” (victim parent, 2002). As empathetic starts, citizens will side with the victims of the defendant’s crimes because they belief the defendant’s crimes were out of evil and cruel torture and deserves all the punishment he can get and not get a break and let back to society where he has the ability to commit potential
This letter is addressed to Senator Dorothy Whitcomb, who is undecided on the decision about KECIP to abstain for the legislation of KECIP . In this paper I will argue that some of the reasons for Senator Dorothy Whitcomb to refrain from the proposal of the legislation of making KECIP a law, while relating these reasons to the moral theories of Consequentialism and The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing. Some reasons that Senator Whitcomb should refrain from legislating KECIP are that some of the rules of this law are morally incorrect for the person who has been kidnapped, these laws are not convenient for the people who have been kidnapped, it is not indicated in the law what type and kind of punishment the suspect recieves, and that this law could fail to perform its function properly and as a result a dysfunction of law can occur which can cause complications for
Mallory Benincaso English 2B 1/4/23 Crime and Punishment in Long Way Down The purpose of this essay is to discuss the nature of a crime, the subsequent punishment, and who is truly affected by it in Jason Reynolds’ Long Way Down using the first person point of view. Using Shawn’s point of view, we will discover the environment in which people can become a victim or an aggressor within a community. We will also explore why he would commit a crime to that degree and his perspective of taking accountability of that crime. Additionally, we will learn his perspective of serving justice using his own words, actions, and beliefs.
Between 1978 and 2001 “at least 65 women disappeared from the Downtown Eastside district of Vancouver, British Columbia” (Robert Pickton Case 2016). Robert Pickton, the most infamous serial killer in Canadian history, admitted to a cell mate that he murdered forty-nine of those women. Pickton was charged with twenty-six counts of second-degree murder and convicted of six. He never plead guilty to any of these charges in court and has shown no remorse for the brutality he released on these victims. The factors included in the Pickton case are his childhood, Victimology Theory, Routine Activity Theory, and Social Process Theory, as well as the advancement of Geographical Profiling this case brought.
My paper aims to discuss the three different factors of criminal behaviour, what causes it and why. My essay will examine and focus mainly on the genetic makeup of a person, the environment in which they are raised in and gender differences.
Between the mid-late 1970s and the early 1980s, Dennis Nilsen began mass murdering young men in Great Britain that had at least 15 men through strangulation (Crime Investigation, 2014). In analyzing his life, many of contributions throughout his life could have influenced his criminal behaviour when committing his crimes. Many theories such as broken home hypothesis and schema therapy theory use psychological explanations that determine how the individual resulted into committing their crimes. With schema therapy theory, not only does it discuss the justification for criminal behaviour, but suggests how to reduce the relapse of criminal acts by identifying the cause or the trigger of the individual’s criminal behaviour (Vos et al., 2016). In Dennis Nilsen’s life, there are several indications such as the abandonment of his family members, the termination of a past relationship, and the reclusiveness from society that could have resulted
“The Brothel Boy” is a short written by Norval Morris concerning a young, mentally incompetent boy who has been accused of rape resulting in the death of a young girl. Assistant Police Magistrate Blair must investigate the case and impose justice on the perpetrator (Morris, 1992). The case surrounding the brothel boy highlights many aspects of the criminal justice system in regard to the essence of the crime committed, the motivation behind the crime, and the prosecution process. The criminal justice system often distinguishes between two types of offenses: mala prohibita and mala in se. Offences like prostitution and gambling that are not necessarily wrong in nature, but are prohibited by law are considered mala prohibita.
Within the past couple of decades, criminologists have developed different criminological theories that apply to the social behaviors and decisions of criminals. One of the earliest theories developed regarding criminality is the rational choice theory, in which describes the rationalization of determining if the rewards from committing the crime outweigh the consequences. In Scarver’s case, his decision to engage in criminal activities outweighed the potential consequences, or the other alternatives if he did not engage in such criminal activities. In addition to the rational choice theory, Scarver’s criminality can be related to the social disorganization theory, which describes the influence of one’s social and physical environment on one’s decision to commit a crime. Lastly, the strain theory can be related to Scarver’s criminality as well, as it is used to describe an individual who lacks the means to obtain such goals, and aspirations, so therefore, he or she engages in criminal activities to acquire the goals.
Consent can either always be recognised, never recognised or sometimes be recognised as a ground of justification. Consent always recognised is where if consent is given the accused can never be charged with that crime. The law should reflect the victim’s choice to consent as a legitimate excuse of individual autonomy. For example, property crimes with consent will not result in theft or malicious damage to property. Consent that is never recognised as defence is identified as ‘paternalism’.
The MacDonald Triad is an important piece of information that can possibly identify deviant behavior in juveniles that lead to serial killings in the future. The triad includes three ominous parts to it including; fire setting, enuresis, and cruelty to animals. A key element to the triad is large number of serial killers have admitted to experiencing and committing at least one aspect of the triad. Neglect and child abuse have all been concurrent with serial killers that have characteristics relating to the triad.
Victims, Victimization and Victimology: A Socio-Legal Study Dr. (Mrs.) Ravidankaur R. Karnani Assist. Professor & I/c. Principal, Law College, Palanpur karnani_ravidan@yahoo.com, 7990980278 Abstract For many decades, the victim was the forgotten party in the criminal justice system as the main focus was that the perpetrator of a crime should be punished. But the victims of crimes stand poised equally in the scales of justice as the victim is not a passive object but an active component of the whole judicial process.
John Wayne Gacy vs. Mary Bell Ms. Stubbs-Mesumbe Business Law Jazmin Valverde November 27, 2015 In this paper, I will be comparing both two similar cases of serial killers, for example, how was their own early life, the reason behind the murder, and their conclusion towards the crime. First of all, these two individuals have a similar type of child abuse in their early years that might have triggered something sooner or later in years. There’s a time difference between these two individual when they committed the crime but, the reason will bring us to our second reason. Secondly, the reason would be the cause of why they committed the crime would be about their horrible experience as a younger child.
Where external and internal factors play a part and they are fated to be a criminal. The scientific grounds are offenders and people who have not yet offended can be given help, and they can be diagnosed by experts and receive treatment needed to not offend (Cavadino, 2007
The disadvantage of this approach is the fact that it does not focus on the victim instead it justifies the offender’s actions by regarding them as patients and victims of dysfunctional societies Restitution
According to this theory individuals experience negative reactions and emotions, especially anger, when they are treated unjustly. Individuals who experience physical/emotional abuse, maltreatment, rejection and/or anger are more likely to