Throughout history there have been many people whom have proposed the “best’ regime for a society. Two of the most notable and influential people in history were two classical Greek philosophers, Aristotle and Plato. Both philosophers had their own approaches, when explaining which of the six regimes worked best. The six regime types are a kingship, an aristocracy, a polity, a democracy, an oligarchy and finally a tyranny. It is seen that the ‘best’ regime is a kingship, the second best is an aristocracy, and the least of the best is a polity, or a politeia, also known as a constitutional republic. Each of the ‘best’ regimes have polar opposites that are considered the worst regimes. The worst of the worst is a tyranny, next worst is an oligarchy …show more content…
Compared to Plato he used more of a scientific approach. When determining his choice of the ‘best’ regime, Aristotle had to make the assumption that people by nature are ‘zoon politikon’ which is translated to political animals, in other words humans are inheritably social animals. Because he sees humans as political animals, he believes that the ‘best regime is the one that comes natural to the society. Even though he agrees that the ‘best’ overall regime is a kingship, it is one that could be easily corruptible, which is called a tyranny. A tyranny would be awful for the majority of society because the leader would only be acting on self-interest. An aristocracy, being a regime ruled by the best class within a society would be the next best option, but when corrupted becomes an oligarchy; and this is when those in control act on class-interest and neglect the rest of the classes within the society. An oligarchy according to Aristotle is best when the rich outnumber the poor, so in the end they would be making decisions for the majority. Aristotle feels the least worst of the corruptible regimes is a democracy because at least the majority would rule, and this regime works best if the population of the poor exceeds that of the rich. Ultimately he feels like a polity would be the most natural to a society with a large middle class. There isn’t much problem with having a large middle class because it eases tension between the poor and the rich, since it’s the richest of the poor and the poorest of the rich. A polity, also known as a constitutional republic, is when everyone is involved in certain matters, but only a small group for other issues. Even though a polity might not be the best regime in general, Aristotle says it’s the most practical and most realistic of all
Many people debate over which form of government is best. In his In Praise of the Emperor Constantine, Eusebius Pamphilus argues that monarchy is the superior. Monarchy reflects God’s created order. There is one God, not two or three, and thus there ought to be one ruler (WH: 357, 27). Eusebius argues that because God is divine and perfect and holly, and because He (God) created humans in His own image, humans ought to emulate God and His order (WH: 358, 11).
As we have established, if the primary role of the state is to secure and maintain the most possible happiness for the people, the surely an unjust state would not be a state capable of achieving this goal. Monarchies seem the ideal constitution to Aristotle because the virtue of the monarch is not diluted by the potentially selfish desires of others. However, this is also the least stable of the
Simonton’s argument on oligarchy as an ideological commitment to anti-democracy that was historically preserved by political institutions is a brand new scholarly theory. How does Beard’s historical account of the rise of the Republic maybe tell a story of an oligarchy trying to accommodate the popularity of popular government while still maintaining control? The rise of the Republic is poorly documented yet again by the Romans, Beard notes. The Roman mania for simplification hid much of what had happened; this simplification also arose from the fact that there were few records.
Aristotle thought the best form of government was a polity or constitutional government; however, a polity was non-existent in Aristotle’s time. Correspondingly, Locke
After coming to the conclusion that everyone needs to be treated equal in order for their society to be functional, Socrates decides to examine the four types of government and how justice and injustice are formulated from these governments. These four governments are timocracy, oligarchy, democracy and tyranny. In a timocracy, men are obsessed with honor and will become ambitious of money and power. From this, the next form of government oligarchy is created. Oligarchy is a society where the rich are in control and rulers are chosen from wealth alone.
He justifies the need for democracy, aristocracy and monarchy depending on location. The three philosophers use their judgment and prior knowledge on each other’s work to validate an ideal society, especially for the uprising continent of America. Governments are an established institution in every society. Though there are multiple types of governments, their purpose is fundamental to determining the influence on a civilization.
At the start of the early-modern period of European history, feudalism was dying, and countries looked to strong, centralized governments for leadership. The popular political theory to address this new development was absolutism. Absolute monarchs reduced the power of nobles in order to consolidate the nation’s leadership under one banner. During the 17th and 18th centuries, Europe’s political landscape was dominated by this form of government. Monarchy was seen by the early modern Europeans as the best form of government for a variety of reasons.
There has been a lot of debate on whether Plato is a totalitarian or not, a debate namely advanced by Karl Popper. In Plato’s «Republic», through Socrates’ demonstration that justice is not a convention and is not in the interest of the stronger, Plato draws the picture of an ideal state. I believe that Plato is a totalitarian but not according to the modern vision of totalitarianism. I will analyse Plato’s «Republic» through his criticism of democracy making him authoritarian, then I will explore the idea of freedom in Plato’s ideal state and finally will look at the control that Plato believes should be instaured in the state. I should firstly define what I think is the modern view of totalitarianism.
In The Republic, Plato writes about his thoughts on good, justice, and how we can achieve it. He starts off by stating that for human happiness and to live the best life philosopher-kings are needed. Not everyone can become a philosopher; certain people simply are non-philosophers also called lovers of sights and sounds. Plato makes the distinction between lovers of wisdom(philosophers) and lovers of sights and sounds clear using beauty as an example. Non-philosophers see ''fine tones and colours and forms and all the artificial products that are made out of them''(476b) but are unable to see or to understand absolute beauty.
Second is to find the best individuals to rule and the ones that will be ruled. Make sure that they have safe, and stable lives to live. Keep the large middle class in line to the rules and keep them stable. Also, make sure it hard to separate the people in the group into different groups. The last point is the have the best lawmakers for the middle class.
1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.
Thomas Hobbes in his book “Leviathan” argues that an absolute monarchy is the best form of government. He provided several reasonings in defending his views; laws obeyed, the interest of the people achieved, consistent laws and social utility maximized. In this paper, I will look at the advantages and disadvantages of having a monarchy, and I will support his argument that monarchy is necessary for society and why it is the best form of government. In a monarchy, the sovereign can be self-motivated, and Hobbes agrees that the self-interest motivates a monarch just like everyone else leading to corruption and unfair distribution of wealth in a society.
Democracy- the best form of governance; is evidently disputed in modern day politics. The disagreement has been carried on for centuries, as seen in Plato 's Republic and Pericles Speeches. According to The Republic, democracy cannot be implemented as the common man lacks the in-depth knowledge of vital spheres of bureaucracy such as economics, military stratagem, international conditions, and the niceties of law. However, this form of governance is viewed in a much more favorable light by Pericles in Thucydides ' History of the Peloponnesian Wars. He believes democracy is all beneficial to every sector of society and should be run for the general well-being, serving the ultimate goal of equality in justice.
Vyrypaeva Veronika Group 1 Essay To what extent could Plato’s Republic be or not be justifiably characterized as a closed and authoritarian society without freedom? Plato is one of the most influential and well-known philosophers of all times. Although he lived in the 4th century B.C., Plato tried to find solutions to many problems we are facing even today. I am going to analyze his Utopia as an idea of the ideal state with its own laws and principles.
Multiple sources will be used from print media to internet sources to give a thorough look into what ‘Totalitarianism’ and ‘liberal democracies’ are. Conceptual Orientation: • Democratic: Government by the people,