In the article “To Lay Violent Hands” by Matthew L. Williams, the prosecution and punishment for rape were discussed at length, but in reality, at the time very few people were actually convicted of rape. Many received lesser convictions such as attempted rape or assault which resulted in whippings or other lesser punishments, but only a small minority received a conviction of rape and were executed. As contemporary readers, we as a class wondered if rapists faced a lower rate of conviction due to the harsh punishment or perhaps due to the lack of women’s rights at the time. In this essay, I will attempt to analyze whether it was the death penalty, societal norms, or both that prevented so many accused rapists from being convicted.
First I
…show more content…
First I will use the US as a reference because we have considerably lessened the punishment over the years. In the colonial period, the penalty for rape was the death penalty and the conviction rate was one conviction in eight cases, which is about 12.5% (Williams). Since the 1970s, the punishment for rape of an adult woman is a prison sentence, and on average convicted rapists are sentenced to 9.8 years and serve 5.4 years (Laws regarding Rape). The conviction in reported cases of rape in the twenty-first century was about 8%, though if you consider unreported cases, only about 2.5% are convicted in a sample size of 1000 (The Criminal Justice System: Statistics). Of course, these sample sizes are vastly different, but it does show that reducing the punishment of rape from the death penalty didn’t have a noticeable impact. Additionally, in both time periods, a majority of cases are never reported to the police. Out of 1000 cases, only 310 are reported and I would assume a similar percentage was true in the 18th century, due to reasons regarding purity and marriage mentioned …show more content…
In colonial America, slaves faced higher rates of conviction for rape than whites did. In modern America, a woman’s place in society, economic status, and witnesses all affect whether a rapist is convicted. A man’s place in society may be even more important, as there are many politicians with accusations against them that would probably place many others in jail. There is also the consideration of the age of the victim when determining both reliability and punishment. In 1977 The United States Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty for the rape of an adult woman (often about age 12 or older) was a cruel and unusual punishment under the 8th Amendment. However, in a few states, including Louisiana, the death penalty was an option for those convicted of rape of a child. It wasn’t until the 2008 case Kennedy v. Louisiana that the United States outlawed the death penalty for all rape cases, and the decision was made only by a 5-4 majority (Kennedy v.
The Court noted that nearly all states at that time declined to impose such a harsh penalty, with Georgia being the only state that authorized death for the rape of
On May 12, 2013 a Sydney man Mr Lazarus was accused of raping an 18 year old woman in an alley outside his father’s nightclub. This case caused discussion about NSW sexual consent laws. This case clearly highlights the effectiveness and some major flaws of the legal system. During the first jury trial in NSW District Court Mr Lazarus was convicted for rape without sexual consent and resulted in a maximum of five-year prison sentence. After serving in prison for 11 months the Court of Criminal Appeal conducted a second trial for the case which resulted in an acquittal as Judge Tupman claimed that Mr Lazarus truly did believe that Ms Mullins did consent which is a crucial element of the offence of sexual intersource without consent.
The R.v. Ewanchuck (1999) case is a case that shook the Canadian criminal justice system and is considered by feminists a victory because the judge’s decision reflected rape myths and the case is being praised with addressing rape myths in the criminal justice system. The details of the case are; Ewanchuck invited a 17 year- old woman into his van for a job interview ( Dumont, 1999, p. 102-109). After the job interview concluded, Ewanchuck insisted that the woman see his paintings, which were in a trailer behind the van ( Dumont, 1999, p. 102-109). Ewanchuck then took the woman inside the trailer and began to make a series of sexual advances ( Dumont, 1999, p. 102-109).
The Court also noted that most states declined to impose as harsh a penalty as death. Georgia was the only state that authorized the death penalty for rape of an adult woman. Rape does not involve taking another human life therefore, the Court found the death penalty was excessive in severity and revocability (Oyez, n.d.). The Court also stated that in Georgia since 1973, for most of rape convictions, the juries have not imposed the death. That Georgia was one of only two states that allowed the death penalty when the victim was a child (Oyez,
In a 7-2 conclusion, the Supreme Court ruled that recieving a death sentence for raping a woman was a “grossly disproportionate” punishment and that the death sentence enforced should be reversed and overturned. Because the rape did not involve murder, the Court decided that the death penalty was disproportionate and unreasonable punishment, therefore being considered unconstitutional (cruel and unusual
There is also a third view of rape which blames neither the victim nor the rapist but society itself, and this is because there is belief that social norms have an affect on an individuals understanding of what is acceptable. Society also recognizes the consequences of the crime and decides whether they feel the criminal was brought to justice and if not, it can affect the publics view and trust in the justice
An estimated one in four women are sexually victimized during their college years. (Schwarz, Jill, et al., 1). Turner getting a light sentence just makes this statistic more real, the victim will be looked at in the future as just another statistic because of the little that was done about it. The victim was intoxicated at the time of the assault, Turner was also. This often makes the case much more difficult, “A common stereotype of sexual assault on college campuses is that the victim could have partial responsibility if they had consumed drugs or alcohol prior to the assault” (Schwarz, Jill, et al., 2).
In 1757, a sailor who was convicted of sexually assaulting a young male received a beating of 500 lashes, while in 1762, two men received 1000 lashes each for engaging in consensual sex, and in 1806, there were more hangings in England for sodomy than there were for murder offences. Chapter 3 of Rum, Sodomy and the Lash stresses the differences between a pirate’s trial versus a sodomist’s trial in court. Turley explains that pirates are economic criminals, and their crimes directly threaten property. At the same time, sodomites do not put the public in danger but rather challenge the separation between males and females and are no longer a part of the domestic economy and are instead a threat to society’s economic order. It is evident that sodomy was viewed as the worst offence and did not protect the public from real, dangerous
Occasionally, there are circumstances involved that may cause innocent individuals to be punished for crimes they did not commit. This paper will explore jurisdiction, plea deals, and exonerations. Jurisdiction The Steubenville High School rape case occurred on August 11, 2012 in Steubenville, Ohio. The case
While we prefer life in jail, they preferred death. To conclude, a significant extent of the nature of crime and punishment changed between social classes and over the years since the Medieval Period. This is seen through the significant groups that were involved in medieval crime and punishment, the effects of a person’s social class on crime and punishment, the sort of crime each punishment was used for and the difference between crime and punishments between the Medieval Period and today. The Medieval Period lasted from 476 CE to 1453 CE, with different punishments for each crime committed by different social
Once again, unfairly, there are no responsibilities placed on rapists for their heinous