ipl-logo

Alexander The Great: Hero Or Villain?

621 Words3 Pages

“I am not afraid of an army of lions led by sheep. I’m afraid of an army of sheep led by lions” once stated Alexander the Great. This quote once stated by Alexander himself represents a lot more than what he blankly said. What Alexander meant by this is that it does not matter how strong your army is it matters how strong your leader is. This quote is wrong because the leader could be more experienced in war and killing people, than the army. The army might be weaker than the leader, sure the leader knows what they are doing but the army might not know. Alexander the Great is a villain because when his army had some down time they went off on killing sprees, Abandoned his kingdom, and lied and took advantage. Alexander the great, is a villain because he had his army go on killing sprees when they had down time and went to small city-states or civilizations and killed and …show more content…

Alexander the great did spread greek culture and was very brave. Alexander the great was indeed brave and brilliant when it comes to military things but was everyone that called him great heros themselves. Some people that called him great do not think anything bad of him because they were just as ruthless and bloodthirsty as he was. Alexander and his men were bloodthirsty and ruthless just like the rest of his men. The fact that Alexander’s army went off on killing sprees during their downtime, he abandoned his kingdom, and he lied and took advantage of his people is why Alexander the Great is a villain. This is why Alexander the great is really not so great after all. ALexander was more focused on himself then what he could do for his army and his civilization. “I am not afraid of an army of lions led by sheep. I’m afraid of an army of sheep led by lions” Alexander the Great once said. He believes that how strong he is, is more important than the strength of his army. This definitely makes a

Show More
Related

  • To What Extent Was Alexander The Great Cruel

    900 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, recently historians have started to contradict this opinion. Though many people think Alexander was great, he was not a great leader because he did not plan for his death, he thought himself better than he was, and he used brutal methods to conquer land. A great ruler should provide a good example to their people,

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq Essay

    1756 Words  | 8 Pages

    Despite Alexander not being politically great, society remembers him as great because of his military prowess

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq

    818 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first reason why Alexander the Great was really great is because he was able to blend two cultures. “ He hoped that Greek ideas, customs, and traditions would blend with the diverse cultures of the people

    Read More

  • Examples Of Joseph Stalin's Mistakes In Macbeth

    787 Words  | 4 Pages

    “History shows that there are no invincible armies and never have been. ”- Joseph Stalin. Over the centuries, many leaders have risen and fallen, including Hitler, to whom Stalin is referring in the previous quote. If you were to break it down, all leaders have fallen out of favour because of little mistakes, be it

    Read More

  • DBQ Essay: How Great Was Alexander The Great?

    781 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander killed an estimated of 100,000 enemy soldiers, and innocent civilians throughout his rein. (Doc. E). He killed all these people just because he wanted more land to gain more power. Most of these people did nothing to Alexander and had no affect on his life except they were an obstacle in the way of him gaining more power. Also Alexander killed a full army in East India because he saw a major opportunity to take control of land from one of the biggest empires.

    Read More

  • DBQ On Alexander The Great

    527 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander pouring the water explains why he was great because even though his men had given him water, he refused to drink it, for his men were just as thirsty as he was. Allowing the cities to surrender explains why he was great because it shows that he wasn’t a harsh leader that just seizes control, he lets the city decide to surrender in return for kindness. In conclusion, Alexander the Great was a strong, skilled leader. Alexander the Great did show some qualities of a bad leader.

    Read More

  • Parallel Lives Plutarch Analysis

    1783 Words  | 8 Pages

    In Parallel Lives by Plutarch, he portrays Alexander the Great as an outstanding moral individual and an excellent leader of his people. Although Plutarch illustrates Alexander as a wise, compassionate, and ambitious individual, his defense of Alexander against the people who think of Alexander as a bad leader is weak and inefficient. Plutarch’s defense of Alexander’s fallible qualities, such as his drinking problems and his apathy to his people at the later part of his life is questionable and easily disproved, weakening his argument that Alexander is a truly admirable person. The majority of the beginning of Alexander is dedicated to the description of Alexander’s background and his experiences as he grows up into a mature and ambitious

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Research Paper

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Khan And Alexander The Great

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    Compare and contrast the leadership and impact of Genghis Khan and Alexander the Great. Both Khan and Alexander are great leaders. They both conquered large territories and were able to guide both the leaders and the armies underneath their command. Alexander consolidated the Greeks into one empire (although being a Macedonian he was not really seen as Greek), This stopped all intestine wars among the Hellenic cities and somehow put order in the empire, transform Greece into a tremendous war machine that allowed him to conquer their eternal enemies the Persians and most of countries under their domain, reach as far as India before his death. As he was absorbed by Persian customs, and vices, most historians say he forgot his homeland, so

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq Analysis

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Napoleon And Alexander The Great

    760 Words  | 4 Pages

    Napoleon also, was a skilled military leader and became the first emperor of France. Napoleon was a French leader whom quickly rose through the ranks of military during the French revolution and drove his military to expansion and change in the western world. Although they cannot be compared in every way because Napoleon twice relinquished his authority in military leadership, in which Alexander would not have even dreamt of doing. SECTION IV: Alexander the Great should be placed in a time capsule because of his outstanding and notable achievements of brilliant commands and undefeatable battles. He was young and clever with his battle tactics so that he could save the world from imperial enslavement.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great's Influence On Western Civilization

    1171 Words  | 5 Pages

    Alexander the Great and the Macedonian Empire dominated the ancient world from 336 to 323 B.C. through military force and cultural exchange. The army of Macedonia had achieved an abundance of success due to Alexander's ability to provide his militaries with the best weapons, instill the training needed to perform battle formations and endure battle as well as the attitude needed to overcome adversity such as being outnumbered by the Persians. Despite conquering various lands, Alexander the Great chose not to impose his rule, but rather embrace certain customs, in order to spread Hellenism and eliminate the perception of being foreign; the process of unification impacted western civilization by mixing the people of Macedonia with other conquered

    Read More

  • How Did Alexander The Great A Hero Or A Villain

    746 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another reason why he was a villain because he killed members of his family so that he would become the ultimate successor to the throne. This should never be how a king becomes the ruler of his kingdom, ever. Even though I believe that Alexander the Great is a villain, others may think he was a hero. They may think that because he had conquered so many other nations.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great's Impact On Future Generations

    1530 Words  | 7 Pages

    In order to galvanize a large army, a leader must primarily be passionate and convinced in himself. These attributes surely describe Alexander the Great adequately. During

    Read More

  • How Did Ancient Greece Influence Ancient Rome

    1428 Words  | 6 Pages

    Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.

    Read More

More about Alexander The Great: Hero Or Villain?

Open Document