There is a discernible line between revolutionary leaders and tyrannical dictators. Sometimes history may blur this line making it difficult to distinguish between the two. Although Napoleon may have done some beneficial things in his life that were “revolutionary”, I think the evidence overwhelmingly shows that he was a tyrannical dictator. Napoleon may have done some beneficial things for the French people like eliminating Jewish ghettos and ending seigneurial dues. Yet we should not forget his selfishness, destructive tendencies, and that he most certainly benefited personally from all of these good doings. “...takes a dim view even of Napoleon’s liberal views by pointing out that as the First Consul he shut down critical French Newspapers”. …show more content…
His humble beginnings and small homeland instilled in him an ambition to prevail over these shortcomings. This ambition, though not a fault in and of itself, was possibly his downfall and controlled most of his life decisions. For example, Bonaparte made valuable connections with important leaders of the French revolution by befriending them quickly leading to a promotion. “I no longer consider myself a mere general, but a man called upon to decide the fate of the people.” Napoleon declared this soon after one of his earliest victories phrasing it almost as if he’d been chosen upon by god like the royalty that preceded him. But revolutionary leaders don’t lead revolutions because they were selected by a divine being, they lead because their country is in dire need of change. We see this unrelenting ambition all throughout Napoleon’s life. Taking over European countries like collecting medals and basically crowning himself Emperor of France. “In 1804, Napoleon climbed the ultimate political rung by prevailing on Pope Pius VII to coronate him the Emperor of France”. Whatever he wanted he took without thinking twice. His shade of greed complemented his fervent ambition nicely. Napoleon’s biggest blunder is a direct result of this avarice, the loss of some 490,000 soldiers in an invasion of Russia. “...driven by the same obsession that had taken him to Egypt.” Now it had grown much more than simply ambition but an …show more content…
Now if the context of history is laid out upon Napoleon’s actions what is made apparent? Much like most of humanity, he was flawed and complicated. The framework for France was built by this man, without his contribution to the intricate threads of history who knows what would have happened to the France we know today? But a few good actions don’t dismiss the pain and abuse he caused in so many innocent lives. Taking over the world is not a valiant act, conquering what is not yours is not gallant. If Napoleon truly was a revolutionary leader there would be no argument. He was not on par with the likes of Genghis Khan or Hitler, but just because he wasn’t the worst leader in history doesn’t automatically make him the best. The line may be blurred but it is clear Napoleon Bonaparte was no revolutionary, but an oppressive tyrant who desired only power and
Q8. Napoleon Bonaparte, leader of France, and Adolf Hitler, leader of Germany, had several things in common when it came to attacking and having their downfall in Russia. Russia would be somewhat of a deciding factor, turning point, and or beginning of the downward spiral for both leaders and their countries. Russia posed a huge threat to both of them and it was an extensive country that stood in their way. Both invasions by Napoleon and Hitler into the Soviet Union were stopped by the same methods from the Russians.
Although Napoleon was considered of as a bad ruler for losing some battles along the way, he proves to be a good ruler because he created an army that won many battles, he had very good military tactics, and he uses the idea of democratic despotism to help compromise with the people about their power. First, Napoleon won many battles along the way while using his great military tactics. His first battle that he won was in the French port of Toulon. Then he won some battles against the Austrians which gave him most of northern Italy.
In 1789, the French Revolution had started. The Frenchmen of the 3rd estate revolted against the King and the unfair inequality the French Laws. After the death of King Louis XVI, France fell into chaos. There have been attempts to restore order into France, however all failed. This time was called the Reign of Terror.
The French Revolution that took place between 1789 and 1799 changed France and Europe forever. In 1799 Napoleon Bonaparte came to power, ruling until 1815, as essentially a dictator. The Revolutionary goals were much influenced by the ideas of the Enlightenment. The political goals of the revolution focused on the necessity to have a constitutional government. The economic and social objectives of the revolution were mainly about equality under the law and an end to the old aristocratic order.
Several years ago, I lived as a peasant girl. Both of my parents are laborers on a rural farm, as well as myself, because I was already 12 years old and we needed to survive. We were surviving, but without the extras in life. We were lucky to at least have food, shelter, and clothing. It was a better life that a lot of the other families had at that time.
Stemming from those problems, changes by the people have lead Napoleon to obtain power to lead the revolution and more, while the Napoleon reign ends to pave way to a constitutional monarchy after royalties return to France. In this constitutional monarchy, it gave rights to the lower class and equalities between the people and much more. Is this not what the people of
Napoleon Bonaparte was a well-known military leader that lived from 1769 until 1821. Napoleon moved through the ranks of the military very quickly. By 1802, Napoleon had gained full power over the French government, and by 1804 Napoleon self proclaimed himself Emperor Napoleon I. Through reading and analyzing primary and secondary sources, it is clear as to why Napoleon was so quick to rise to power and what principles of the Revolution Napoleon upheld and which ones he did not.
Although Napoleon's military success was what solidified the French Revolution originally it was also the revolutions downfall. Napoleon became obsessed with his image, legacy, and the size of his empire rather than its well-being, he began to attempt to conquer the majority of Europe, while his new revolutionary laws and society began to fall apart in his old French Empire. Document #2 demonstrates this by showing many states/countries under the rule of Napoleon as of 1810. Based on this document it can be inferred that Napoleon wished to rule all of Europe and had turned his focus to conquering as many places as possible while the ideals of the french revolution fell
France was very different before Napoleon came along. Before Napoleon France was controlled by an absolute monarchy. France was also under the old regime which was a system that existed in most of Europe at that time. Also all laws were created by the Legislative assembly. Based upon historical documents and his own words Napoleon Bonaparte had a negative impact on France.
It is seen that the power rid of Napoleon’s conscience, and created a ruthless dictator.
Following the Reign of Terror, France was ruled by a corrupt five-man governing body called the Directory, which was overthrown by Napoleon Bonaparte through a coup d’état. Napoleon, a military general, rose to power through a series of military conquests and eventually became the First Consul of the French Republic. The French people viewed Napoleon favorably, as his military and political genius would likely lead to the creation of a prosperous and united France. Moreover, they believed that he would uphold the ideas they had fought for during the French Revolution: liberty, equality, and fraternity. While Napoleon stabilized and united French society by supporting the liberty of his people and ensuring equality of opportunity in education
When somebody receives incredible power, they also receive a large burden of responsibility. Some people, such as Napoleon, disregard these responsibilities and become corrupt. In reality, we have seen this in leaders such as Stalin, who became corrupt once into power. In “Animal Farm”, Napoleon, a totalitarian pig, is a great example of how too much power is equal to corruption.
Atleast he actually opened up education to boys even for those that could not even afford it. Napoleonic code was something that eliminated many injustices. But also it limited free speech and press, and brought back slavery. Soon after that Napoleon elected himself as emperor. Which was actually kind of cool because he sent out a thing for everyone to see if it was a good idea for him to become an emperor or not.
Napoleon Bonaparte has always been seen as a tyrant, but he has made many positive impacts on the world. Napoleon rose to power after the French Revolution. There, Napoleon would become a genius general and later he would appoint himself Emperor of France. Napoleon Bonaparte used his power to impact the modern world through the Napoleonic Wars, the sale of Louisiana Purchase to the United States of America, and the Napoleonic Code.
Napoleon Bonaparte was born on August 15, 1769 on the Mediterranean island of Corsica. He attended school in France, where he learned French and graduated from a French military academy in 1785, where he became a lieutenant of the French Army. He became the husband of Josephine de Beauharnais in 1796, but got divorced since they did not have any heirs yet, he married Marie Louise in 1810 and had a son named Napoleon Francois Joseph Charles Bonaparte a year later. Since Napoleon had conquered the city of Rome, he gave his son the title of King of Rome. There are many facts that explain why Napoleon was considered one of the greatest leaders in history, but the main reasons why he is regarded as such is because he was helpful, charismatic, brave and brilliant.