“Were the American colonist justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain?” There comes a time in history when a nation needs to break the bands that hold them down from becoming a great nation. In this case, the colonists had the right to break the bonds from the British Empire in the 1700s. About one hundred colonists left Europe to seek religious freedom and make the unknown their new home. As the colonist moved into their new homes in America, the British wanted to make some money from their new colonies in America. The British placed harsh taxes on the colonist without the colonist having a say in what taxes were to be put on them. On top of that, the British violated their rights with the terror of the British redcoats, by …show more content…
This can be seen in “Charles F. Adams, Works of John Adams” where Adams talks about a law that was passed during the late 1700s, called the Stamp Act. He says, “...The Stamp Act...unconstitutional tax is to be laid upon us all…” Adams understands the need for taxes, but this is a tax that neither he or any of the other colonist gave their consent to. The Stamp Act was a tax on every piece of printed paper which were legal documents, newspaper, and playing cards. This not only arranged the colonist but it began to break a bond with Britain. The colonist was infuriated that they were being taxed for the paper when they had no say in what types of taxes would be passed and because of that, the bond began to break between the colonist and the British. Another event that hurt the bond between Britain and the colonist was the Boston …show more content…
In the picture called “Bloody Massacre,” it shows the events during the Boston Massacre by Paul Revere. In the picture, it shows British redcoats firing their guns at colonist in front of a Customs House in Boston. Colonist was outside the house protesting the British troops that lived in Boston to enforce the laws of Britain. As tension grew the redcoats fixed their bayonets and formed a line in front of the court house. The colonist responded by throwing snowballs at the redcoats, and then the redcoats began to open fire on the colonist killing 5 and wounding much more. This action from the redcoats is uncalled for and cannot be justified on the British side because these soldiers are supposed to be the bravest and strongest men of the time and they decide to open fire on colonist when they get hit with snowballs. The killing of Crispus Attucks, Patrick Carr, Samuel Gray, Samuel Maverick, and James Caldwell was a direct attack on the colonist and shows the terror of the redcoats. With the events of this tragic event, this once again proves why the colonist was justified in breaking the bond with Britain. With the loss of the colonist’s life, another reason why the colonist was justified in breaking bonds with Britain was the ideas of the philosopher John
One week ago, the colonist attacked the British. This was a tragic event where the Colonist threw snowballs, clubs,oysters,and chunk of ice. In addition they told us the British,to fire if we dared, so we did but, on accident. Once one of us fired, other British started to. The colonist protested that they were unarmed but they really had many items that could kill.
The American Revolution from 1765 -1783 was a political and social explosion, resulting in the separation of the thirteen colonies from the British Empire to form an independent Nation, The United States of America. Perhaps the single greatest turning point of modern Revolution, the beginning of a collective nation breaking away in favor of certain universal doctrines. These social, economic, political and intellectual ideals, is part of the fabric of what the colonies saw as a vision of independent Nation. At the time it was widely debated whether the thirteen colonies should remain under British control, for a number of reasons. The British Empire offered a more stable economic system designed to profit its subjects, and also boasted of a stable
One loud shot was fired, leaving everyone with the question of “who fired first,” The Revolutionary War had begun. The American colonist were unquestionably right in waging war and breaking away from Britain. The colonist no longer wanted to be under Britain's strong mercantilist. Conflict had rose between the mother country and the colonist. The American colonist were justified in waging and breaking away from Britain because of taxes, treatment, and mercantilism.
In the famous engraving based on the Boston Massacre, by Paul Revere, the engraving illustrates the conflict tension between the colonists and British officials during the major taxing acts. The image setting encompasses a late afternoon, on King Street. The image displays British soldiers firing into a crowd of civilians, murdering three, and injuring two. The British have the advanatge of weaponary, and auhtority, giving the illusion the soldiers are guilty of assault, by the viewers point of view. An important detail to point out is the colors represented by the soldiers versus the colonists.
This photo showed the Bloody Massacre Perpetrated in Kings Street in Boston” just 3 weeks after the Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770. It is regarded by historians as an important document of the pre-revolutionary period. At the same time it is known to contain number of inaccuracies because the author used it as a propaganda piece to advance the cause of Independence The British are lined up and an officer is giving an order to fire, implying that the British soldiers are the aggressors. The colonists are shown reacting to the British when in fact they had attacked the soldiers British faces are sharp and angular in contrast to the Americans’ softer, more innocent features.
The Boston Massacre is one of America’s most memorable moments in history. The Tragedy of March 5th was a leading event that soon stimulated its significance toward the American Revolution. The debate of who to blame for the occurrence of the massacre is still ongoing, and like most debates there are two different sides to the argument. Doug Linder, phenomenally explains the events that led to the massacre in his article “The Boston Massacre Trails: An Account”, in which he analyzes all facts and aspects that occurred during the trial to the point where he explores who is to blame for the horrendous event on the night of march 5th. In the article, Linder is trying to explain that through all the pain and death during that dreadful night, the
British leaders thought that the colonists would accept the indirect taxes such as import duties, but clearly the colonist did not take it well. the colonist thought that great britain is abusing there power. which lead to Boston massacre. Boston Massacre was a street fight that happened on March 5, 1770, between a patriot mob, throwing stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed.
During the first years of the English settlements of North America the people who immigrated from England they formed colonies that with the support of the British government. The colonist didn 't pay a lot of taxes on their trading benefits to the government. Through the years, the King and the parliament started raising taxes on almost everything that the colonist was producing in the colonies. The colonists weren 't happy with the new taxation that the king was charging to the colonies, and it led the colonist to protest at British empire. There are several reasons why the colonists revolted against the British government.
The American Revolution was, to date, the best event to happen on American soil, providing freedom and representation in government to the individuals who fought so hard for it. France and Spain aided our cause, helping this group of brave colonists to defeat the strongest army in the world. But, there is a question still not answered; were the colonists justified in breaking away from Britain? The American colonists were justified in breaking away from the British because there was taxation without representation, they had no freedom, and the British government violated their individual British rights. I believe the American colonists were justified for breaking away from Britain because there was taxation without representation.
Britain was forcing the colonists to house the British soldiers and there was no compensation. The British government also violated the colonist’s rights by restricting trade by preventing other nations from purchasing products form the North American colonial market. Obviously, the Founding Fathers were justified in rebelling because the British government was taking advantage of the colonists. Parliament applied various taxes, and forced the colonists to house British soldiers which violated the rights of the colonists.
The British government was not looking for the best of the people. They were only thinking about what they wanted; the government was not interested in what the people wanted so they decided to make decisions on their own, which resulted in changes that form the United States today. Because of this, they were justified in rebelling and declaring independence. One reason why the colonists decided to rebel and declare independence was because of taxation.
During the Colonial Era (1492-1763), colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain; due to the inequitable Stamp Act, the insufferable British oppression, and the perceived tyranny of King George III, the king of Great Britain, however, the colonists were unjustified in some of their actions. In Colonial America, colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain, because the Stamp Act was unfair and viewed as punishment. Because of the war, Britain had no other choice but to tax the colonists to pay for the debt. For example, according to document 2, the author states that the act was not only for trade but for “the single purpose of levying money.”
In result, economic changes would come to the colonies. Parliament met in 1763 and came to the conclusion that they were not receiving the profit they needed from the colonies (Document F). As a result, many taxes were passed by British Parliament upon the colonies, including the Sugar Act, the Stamp Act (Document H) and the Tea Act. The American colonies were not happy, to say the least. Americans protested, saying that these taxes were unnecessary and unfair.
“Clang, Clang,” came the noise from the church bell on the snowy morning. “Trot, Trot,” came from the soldiers’ horses as they marched down the street. We colonists are going through tough times as the Stamp Act has just now gotten enforced. My father’s printing shop across the street was receiving many shipments of paper today. Mother was at her “Daughters of Liberty” meeting, probably making clothes to distribute across Boston on Christmas Eve.
The major events of the American Revolution included many horrific things that many people are astonished even to hear about today. Some of the horrific events were accidental, some involved miscommunication, and some were the results of violence by cruel people. One of the major events, though, contained all of the three reasons, and it is widely known as The Boston Massacre. Some people interpret the Boston Massacre as an event based on rage, but it was, in fact, nearly the opposite. It was based very little on rage, in fact, it was mostly an accident.