I. The Electoral College is an unnecessary institution that undermines democracy by not ensuring the victory of the presidential candidate who wins the plurality of the popular vote, by creating a system in which not all votes are equal, and by incentivizing politicians to focus on the needs of specific states while ignoring others. II. A. The Electoral College is a body of people that represent each state within the United States and formally cast votes for their state in the election of the president. Votes are distributed among the states based on relative population. California has the maximum number of votes at 55; the minimum number of votes per state is 3. B. A hanging chad occurs when a punch card based voting card is not completely …show more content…
In 1824, Andrew Jackson lost the presidential election to John Quincy Adams despite winning the largest percentage of the popular vote in what is now known as the corrupt bargain. The voting was sent to the House of Representatives after none of the 4 candidates in the race won enough votes to secure a majority in the electoral college. In the house, John Quincy Adams compromised with speaker, Henry Clay, who arranged for Adams to win in exchange for the position of Secretary of State. The man that the largest percentage of Americans wanted to be their president lost. b. In 1876, Samuel Tilden won the United States popular vote but 20 votes in the Electoral College were disputed. Through the Compromise of 1877, the 20 votes went to Rutherford B. Hayes who won the presidency and in return for the votes, ended reconstruction. Again, the man that won the majority of votes did not win in the Electoral College. c. In 1888, Grover Cleveland won the popular vote by 100,000 votes. However, he lost the Electoral College by 65 votes. No compromise or bargain was used to settle the election, revealing that even without under the table deals, the winner of a popular presidential vote could fail to win the Electoral …show more content…
In 2016, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by slightly under 3 million votes. However, she lost the Electoral College by 77 votes. For the 5th time, the person who won the largest portion of the popular vote lost in the Electoral College. Thus, the Electoral College inhibits democracy by preventing the candidates who the American people want to win an election from actually winning said election. IV. The Electoral College undermines democracy by creating a system in which not all votes are equal. a. Under the Electoral College system, votes in small states are worth more than votes in large states. For example, the state with the largest number of electors, California, has 1 elector for every 680,000 people while the smallest state, Wyoming, has 1 elector for every 190,000 people. This gives a vote from Wyoming more importance in the Electoral College than a vote from California, undermining the one person, one vote basis of democracy. b. If there is a tie in the Electoral College, the vote goes to the house where every state receives 1 vote. If a state is gridlocked, meaning that it has an equal number of electors voting for each candidate, it doesn’t receive a vote. This facet of the electoral college undermines democracy by giving each state a maximum of one vote, regardless of the number of people in the state. This further limits a one person, one vote system of
Walter E. Williams discuss how Hillary Clinton blamed the electoral college for her losing the presidential election. Williams stated that many individuals believed that the electoral college is dangerous when it comes to American politics. Individuals also claims that there are three electoral votes, or one electoral vote per 200,000 people in the state of Wyoming which was another factor that weight in the presidential election. In California, one electoral vote equals 715,000 people. Williams also stated that there a lot of individual who complain about using the electoral college since they believe that it’s undemocratic.
Sophie Goldenberg Honors Civics Electoral College DBQ Should the Electoral College be Repealed or Remain as is? On every first Tuesday in November of every fourth year, many Americans go to the polls to vote for their favorite candidate. Little do they know that they are actually voting for electors who then go vote for the president. This process is called the Electoral College.
The Electoral College is pretty much a process that was established in the Constitution by the founding fathers which was suppose to be a compromise between election of the President by a vote in congress and by the popular vote of citizens. This process consists of the selection of electors, the meeting of the electors is where they vote for the President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress. In the Electoral College it contains 538 electors and to win the majority they need to have 270 electoral votes. As well as, the number of electors for every state is equal to the number of Representations that the state has in congress which is based on the population and there is also one vote for each Senator. So, each state has at least three electors and votes.
Under the 23rd Amendment of the Constitution, the District of Columbia is allocated 3 electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College. Each candidate running for President in your state has his or her own
Like many others great creation the Electoral College has some downfalls. The first con of the Electoral College according to Amelia Josephson " It gives too much power to swing states". What this means is when candidates run for president are more likely to target swing states rather than going to a state that always goes blue or red. Candidates do this because they are trying to sway the swing there way so they can win, which then gives the swing states power into picking the presidency. The second con the Electoral College according Kathleen McCleary
The Electoral College has caused numerous problems in the past and have consequently changed the outcomes of numerous elections including the elections of 1800 (Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Aaron Burr), 1824 (John Quincy Adams, Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay and William H. Crawford), 1876 (Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden), 1888, (Grover Cleveland and Benjamin Harrison), and 2000 (George W. Bush and Al Gore). throughout these elections the same catastrophe has occurred; The winner of the popular vote did not receive the presidency due to the Electoral College votes. In addition to the problems, there have been multiple close calls, for the example the elections of 1968 and 1976. While many analysts of American politics have come to
The Electoral College, in states where they have the winner takes all system, make voters that are voting in states that are strongly controlled by the a certain political party feel like their votes aren’t really important considering that all the electoral votes will just go to the political party that wins. This feeling like out votes don’t count is the biggest argument against the Electoral College that it should’ve been for quite a while already a popular vote decision not an Electoral College decision (Davis). This argument also goes hand and hand where a president and vice president voted into office won because of the popular vote and received a majority of the support. Also removing the Electoral College would remove the power that only a certain states have, the swing states, but the downfall is swing states will just be replaced with high population states. Some people also view the Electoral College as being undemocratic especially in large population states where the votes of the losing political party, are a large number of voters, are essentially
Each state is worth a certain amount of electoral votes. These votes depend on how many representatives each state has in the House of Representatives and the Senate. There is a total of 538 electoral votes. To become president the candidate must reach a total of 270 electoral votes. This process is called the electoral
Lastly, the Electoral College ignores the will of the people. There are 538 electors and over 300 million people in the United States and only 538 people get to decide who gets to be voted in. Is there a better way then the Electoral College for voting? This question is very opinionated because some people think we don’t need the Electoral College at all and other do. But, I think the Electoral College isn’t that bad of a way, because you wouldn’t want some uneducated adult that has no idea what they are doing decide who they want to run the country.
After the election, the candidate who won was General Ulysses S. Grant. Therefore the republican party won the presidential election. In total, Ulysses S. Grant had gathered 214 electoral votes, where as Horatio Seymour had only a total of 80 electoral votes. At the time the presidential candidate only needed 214 electoral votes to win the presidency because not all of the 50 states were established at the time. In the year 1868 there was only a total of 294 electoral votes.
For example disproportionate state votes, tie votes, and unbound electors are hindering democracy. The first and foremost issue is voting. Each state is provided one electoral vote for each member of its delegation, However, depending on a state 's population the amount of electoral votes varies. For example, "an individual in Wyoming has more than triple the weight in electoral votes compared to a citizen in California.
In that case, the election would be thrown to the House of Representatives.” And that, “...each state only casts one vote (Document F)…” Plumer expresses if the electoral votes are tied, then the voting will become more unfair because of the misrepresentation of state population in the House. Lastly, in the presidential election of 1876, the candidates were Hayes and Tilden. Tilden had won the popular vote with an advantage of 245,448 more than Hayes (Document G).
The Electoral College is intended to work by equally distributing the electoral votes amongst the states, based on the state’s percentage of the total population. However, by law, each state will get at least three electoral votes regardless of population. Roughly, each electoral vote should speak for about five hundred and seventy thousand voters (“5 Reasons”). Many times, however, this is not the case. Megan Winkler, a historian and political writer used the state of Ohio as an example: “...the state of Ohio — with a population of 11,500,000 — should have 20 electoral votes.
The Electoral College was the best way to give the decision of who should be president to the people, but not letting the public’s power get out of control. Any changes to the Electoral College make the system even more complicated and hurt more than help. When vetoing the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, Former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said, “the bill subverted the democratic will of California voters by disregarding their presidential preference” (Bowman and DiLasco). The NPVIC gives the electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote. This ignores a state’s preference of presidential candidate.
Five presidents have lost the popular vote, but they won the electoral vote. These presidents include John Quincy Adams (1842), Rutherford B. Hayes (1876), Benjamin Harrison (1888), George W. Bush (2000), and Donald Trump (2016). With the most recent being Donald Trump, this has stirred up many questions including if the people's vote really count. One of the most recent controversies has been with Donald Trump.