Julius Caesar: a beloved man with a tragic and mysterious death to end his tale at the hands of people that he once considered close friends of his. In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar,” the audience gets to witness the conflicts that might have taken place behind closed doors, listening to the debates that took place between such as Mark Antony and Brutus. In the play, Antony tries to convince Brutus that Caesar deserves to be murdered. Near the end, Antony and Brutus both pay homage to Caesar at his funeral in front of the Roman civilians, with Antony delivering the most effective speech by fabricating a refined and potent speech that used rhetorical appeals to persuade the citizens of Rome. In the speech, Antony is trying to sway the crowd into agreeing with the motives for murdering Caesar by using logos to justify his actions. “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he thrice refuse: was this ambition?” This quote explains the thesis by showing that Antony used Caesar’s lack of ambition to indicate that Caesar wasn’t the ideal leader and, therefore, because of how quickly he was gaining power, he had to be stopped before his meager mindset …show more content…
In our world, there has always been power struggles between people, and egos and personal opinions and motives will always play a role in how we choose to view a person and/or their choices. What happened to Caesar is a reminder to people that power can have different effects on different people, and Antony chose to handle Caesar’s rise to power through violence and used a speech to convince to people of Rome. Perhaps Antony did see something in Caesar that that the rest of the people truely didn’t see, or perhaps he used other people’s visions as a way to get rid of Caesar so he had a chance at power. Perhaps we will never
Scene two of act three in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar shows two orators, consisting of Mark Antony and Brutus, giving speeches to a crowd at Caesar’s funeral. Both of them want to convince the audience that their position on the assassination of Julius Caesar is correct. The two both use rhetorical devices to backup their positions. In the end, Antony is victorious. Even though the two speeches have similarities, they also have many differences that made Antony’s speech just that little bit better.
When saying this Antony is logically stating something Caesar did, soon after he asks, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?”. This rhetorical question is making the audience rethink their opinion on Caesar's ambition and justifying his death. Antony's opinion on the death of Caesar was clearly
Act three of Julius Caesar, a play written by William Shakespeare, is the climax of the plot. Julius Caesar has just been assassinated and so the conspirators move on to the bigger problem at hand: convincing the people of Rome that they are sacrifices not murderers. Once Brutus addresses Caesar's ambitious nature and his need to fall from power, Antony is given permission to say a few words for Caesar. Although, Antony had shaken hands with the conspirators and smiled at them he also prophesized that civil war and chaos will plague Rome. In his carefully crafted speech, Antony uses repetition as part of his rhetoric to inspire the Roman citizens into revolting against the conspirators.
Antony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.
This indicates that Antony is willing to sacrifice innocent lives to achieve his goals. This reveals that his misuse of power led to violence and fear in Rome. His actions ultimately led to a civil war. Antony’s misuse of power can be seen through his manipulation of the Roman people, his desire to change Caesar’s will, and his cruel
By refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.
Antony talks the truth about Caesar, when remembering the good he has done and says “He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill” (II16). Antony after asked what seemed ambitious about Caesar when he refused the crown. “You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown which he did refuse” (II25).Caesar didn't seem ambitious he seemed much more like a reliable king the Romans saw him as. Antony seemed much more closer to Caesar.
In the play Julius Caesar by William shakespeare, Caesar is murdered by the senators of rome, to prevent his power hungry ego from destroying their beloved city. During Caesar's funeral, both Marc Antony and brutus give speeches. Both speeches contain athos, which appeals to emotions, and rhetorical questions, these emphasize both of the speeches in different ways. Although Brutus is a convincing orator, Antony's uses a more effective form of rhetorical questions and pathos, which evokes feelings in the audience.. Pathos is a technique used in writing in order to appeal to the reader's emotions.
Trying to convince someone into believing someone's side is hard to do especially when they have no idea how to give a persuasive speech correctly. In Shakespeare's play, Julius Caesar, the characters are put into a situation where they much persuade their ¨audience¨ into believing/siding with them. A good example of this is Portia, who is trying to convince her husband, Brutus, into revealing his troubles to her. On the other hand, Anthony has Rome as a whole for an audience, he was trying to change the mind of the people to target the conspirators as the villians for killing Caesar. Both use rhetorical devices to their advantage to try and gain their ¨audiences¨ trust, and in the end both are successful in a way.
In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.
Antony wanted people to be patient with him. He also says, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff” (3.2. 100-101). Antony says this to show that Caesar was a good man who cared about the people. It was also to show that Brutus was wrong when he stated that Caesar was ambitious. Antony makes the citizens feel that the conspirators murder was
Secondly, Shakespeare uses the repetition of the word ambitious in Antony’s speech to instigate the plebeians, and fill their minds with enough doubts to get them to rebel against the conspirators. Talking about how Caesar refused the crown three times at the Luperical, Antony proclaims, “Which he did thrice refuse; was this ambition. / Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;” (3.2.95-96). Bringing up the Luperical is a strong point. It is still fresh in the memories of many
Antony told the people about him trying to make Caesar king. He told the plebeians that he “thrice presented him a kingly crown,/ which he thrice refused” (3.2 105-106). This was saying that Caesar did not take the crown after three times and he maybe did not want to be king. Maybe Caesar really wanted what was best for Caesars funeral. Caesar could have not been ambitious and really had some good views for Rome future.
Victorian playwright, William Shakespeare, in his tragedy, Julius Caesar, writes a funeral speech delivered by Marc Antony about his dear friend, Julius Caesar 's, death. This followed Marcus Brutus’ speech which defended the actions of the conspirators that killed Caesar by claiming it was done for the good of Rome. Antony refutes these claims through his use of parallelism, making the plebeians analyze Brutus’ allegations, intense imagery to evoke a sense of pity and vengeance their fallen ruler, and reverse psychology that finally infames the plebeians against the conspirators. These strategies are used to indict the conspirators for the murder of a beloved Roman officer and incite the plebeians to riot against Brutus and his men.. Antony’s
This pulls on the pathos of the audience because the rhetorical question pulls on their conscience. Their conscience is questioning whether the murder of Caesar is justifiable, since he was not all the ambitious according to Antony. This allows for Antony to take advantage of the easily pliable minds in the audience and flip their introspections to vanquish the conspirators. Shakespeare uses the repetition of the word ambitious in Antony’s speech to instigate the plebeians, and fill their minds with enough doubts to get them to rebel against the conspirators. Talking about how Caesar refused the crown three times at the Luperical, Antony proclaims, “Which he did thrice refuse; was this ambition. /Yet