Ripken Roberts
Mr. Jolley
English
May 15 2023
Nepolian was the dictator in the Animal Farm by Geroge Orwell; he made rules that forced the animals to work more with less food and would change the rules consistently for his own personal needs. Boxer was a horse in the story that would make the best leader out of all of the animals. Boxer was a nicer animal and would not take advantage of the other animals, he would take them to better and further places on animal farm.
Boxer was a kind hearted horse and wished no harm upon any living thing. If he were to lead an animal farm then he would not make any of the harsh rules. Boxer was a horse that was not very smart but he was kind. If you want your leader for the people, you want less jobs then you better have a nice leader. In chapter nine Boxer accidentally killed a human. He was very sad and said "I have no wish to take human life." While his eyes were full of tears. He is very sad that he killed somebody. He is a tough horse and he never would just cry. You could see in this scenario that he was very sad and didn't try to hurt that human. When he did kill him he felt very sad and didn't want anything to do with taking part in that killing. This evidence is showing that he is a nice animal and doesn't wish harm
…show more content…
He would make a good leader in the fact that he can take responsibility for his own work and actions. When he is injured he still got all of his work done and even when he was on his deathbed he was working for what they needed. In chapter 8 he says " I will work harder for my mistakes." He also says “Napoleon is always right." In the text he is showing how he will finish his worker for his leader and whatever cost it takes. He will work and he will finish what he has started.This evidence is showing how he would be a responsible leader and a good animal. responsible and would make a good leader, he is making people believe that he will take care of your
A lot of his thoughts help us understand how he is feeling a lot better. We can learn a lot by reading this short piece of the story. We first find out that the creature does have humanity. He is not a crazy and reckless monster. When you think monster, you think bad, but this creature is not a bad person.
All the creature wanted was to be accepted and loved and he could have received this if the society around him did not judge others so
It is haunting him in his dreams, and has overtaken all of his other ambitions, including those of interacting with people and pursuing his own happiness. This pursuit of knowledge has led him to ruin and regret, and his hatred for his creature burns within him. Even though he has spent so much time and dedication in building the creature, only regret can follow due to his lack of morals in creating such a thing along with his neglect in other more noble pursuits within his life. It is ironic that the pursuit that overtook his life and well-being managed to end up the thing he hates the most. The pursuit of knowledge leads to the deterioration of his own moral standings and nobler pursuits in
Even though the creature has not had very many positive experiences with humans he still goes out of his way to save one in a time of need. The environment that the creature had just experienced with the cottagers, where they took care of and helped each other, plays a big role in the reason that he saves this little girl from drowning. At the end of the novel, the creature starts to reflect on the things that he has done and tells us the guilt that
He is not given the opportunity to explain himself, who he is, or what his true motives are, but others continue to ridicule and reject him just because of his appearance. This is why he kills so many people, and he realizes that no human would ever care for him; therefore, he wants vengeance and is saddened and enraged about how people treat him. Overall, the creature exhibits a number of behaviors that lead to an understanding of his
He is only driven and by his emotions; it is the only thing he can endorse. He has no reason in his mind, it is seared by emotion. Furthermore, the creature also says, “Your hours will pass in dread and misery, and soon the bolt will fall which must ravish from you your happiness forever. ”(Grimly, 141). He knows a life without happiness is the same as a virtual death.
This piece of evidence tells us that the creature has self-awareness. The creature can feel,
Oh, praise the eternal justice of man. ”(pg.88) The Creature murdered a child and framed an innocent woman, leading to her being executed and he reasons it to be nothing but an act of vengeance for how Victor treated him. William didn’t even know what Victor was doing and Justine certainly didn’t either and they died for the sole reason of being related to Victor. The Creature has placed himself in perpetual victimhood and entitlement because of how badly he was treated by others.
Up to this point, the creature has done nothing wrong to society, at every chance he tries to fit in and affiliate with their life and culture. For a majority of his early years he continues this, but eventually alters his mindset due to his failed
Unfortunately, the Creature succumbs to hate and vengeance. He “declared everlasting war against the species, and more than all, against him who had formed me and sent forth to this insupportable misery”(147). Despite his original curiosity and appreciation for
The Creature 's mind still of a newborn begins to observe his human neighbors as through observations and interactions the family has demonstrates the positive and negative aspects of the Creature.
This respectable action that the creature did was very kind and showed how much he cared for the man who created him with respect. The action that was contrasted in the book showed that the creature did not have the cold heart even if it did not belong to him just the thought to show his respect
He is aware of his otherness and knows that he is “shut out from intercourse” (84) with the people he holds so dear. It can be argued that this is the point where the creature’s humanity is the strongest throughout the course of story. He has a basic understanding of human societies, he speaks and reads their language, shows compassion and, most importantly, seeks their company and friendship. In his knowledge that social belonging is the missing component to his own happiness, he confronts the people he secretly observed only to, once again, be met with fear and anger (94-95). He comes to realise that he
Juliette Blalock Singh 4/5 Animal Farm In the satiric novel Animal Farm by George Orwell, the character Napoleon represents a dictator in society, who turns a self-governed and unbiased farm into his own. Napoleon initially unifies with the rest of the animal’s, but soon decides to take matters into his own hands and disposes of Snowball and his proposals towards the farm. He takes advantage of the vulnerable animals so he can become in command. Napoleon is clever, brutal, and dictatorial to the animals.
Animal Farm shows one direct leadership throughout the book but Lord of the Flies shows a constant power change between the characters in the book, which leads to different styles of leadership which were both beneficial and harmful for their survival. Although these books both are distinct from each other, they contain the same theme of leadership and how leader use their power. Animal Farm has only one type of leadership style throughout the novel, which is an authoritarian leadership style. The character Napoleon is the authoritarian leader and leads the farm after the rebellion due to being one of the smartest but also one of the main advocators for the Rebellion. Many authoritarian leaders set a goal and have everyone work towards accomplishing the goal their way, no matter the cost.