We hear and read doublespeak every day, but if you were to ask a person what doublespeak was, they’ll more than likely have no clue what you’re talking about. What exactly is Doublespeak? Doublespeak, often called “soft language”, or “doubletalk”, is language that has been distorted or changed in order to make an unpleasant, difficult, or just negative situation not sound nearly as awful as it actually is. In his essay “The World of Doublespeak”, author William Lutz discusses the ways in which doublespeak is used, and the dangers of not being aware of when it is being used. Lutz writes that doublespeak is used so often that it is hard to identify when it’s even being used. Furthermore, he claims that doublespeak can destroy the function of …show more content…
The first kind of doublespeak is called euphemism. Euphemisms are used to soften a statement so that what they say does not sound harsh or unrelenting. This type of doublespeak is probably the most common; it’s almost imbedded in our culture to use these words now. Some examples are “passed away” instead of died, “on the streets” instead of homeless, or “elderly” instead of old. The second type is known as jargon. Jargon is lingo shared between members of a specialized group like doctors, lawyers, or educators. It becomes doublespeak when it is used to intimidate, confuse, or impress those who are not familiar with the terms. The third type of doublespeak is gobbledygook or bureaucratese. Gobbledygook is meant to sound impressive to an audience, but is essentially just a way of piling on as many words as possible in order to confuse them. The fourth type of doublespeak is inflated language; language designed to make something seem much more important than it is, like working for a “fortune 500 company”, rather than being a sale associate for Walmart. All of these types of doublespeak share one thing, that is, they are all used intentionally, and have one goal in mind, to conceal
In his essay “The World of Doublespeak,” William Lutz define doublespeak as “a blanket term for language which makes the bad seem good, the negative appear positive, the unpleasant attractive, or at least tolerable” (2013). Lutz goes on to claim “It is language which avoids, shifts, or denies responsibility” (2013). He explains the purpose of doublespeak is to “mislead, distort, deceive, inflate” (2103). Based on many of his examples, such as wording an airplane as an airplane that has had “uncontrolled contact with the ground,” or referring to a city slum as the resident of the “fiscal underachievers,” I feel he may overstate his own definition of doublespeak. While, the play on words in these examples does attempt to deceive the read and
This in the chapter would be defined as mitigating, which would be to use words that assume a lesser role in the conversation making what you say sound far less important than it really was. The counter example used to show how much different that these usually south american and Asian cultures were was our own American speech. He pointed out that the way that we address each other by words alone is one an equal playing field
Linguistics Being supposedly made up on the spot, Noah S. Sweat did not have time to compose an eloquent speech about a controversial topic. He instead spoke a purely unfactual and highly descriptive banter using doublespeak to voice his opinion of whiskey. Both sides of his argument include impactual adjectives to describe the drink. Or as Mr. Sweat would say on line 6, “the devil’s brew,” or on line 12, “the philosophic wine”. Each side of his argument is entirely one sentence long, implying that he emotionally fuels his speech as he works out his thoughts with the audience as one thought flows to the other.
The purpose of this paper is that William Lutz believes that the American society have produced words (doublespeak) that have a double meaning that hide or mislead the truth. He uses descriptive writing to tell his story in this essay. Companies use these words to their advantage to evade information that would stain their company reputation. Lutz poses the question "How many kind of "chiefs" are there?"
She explained how the women were marked but the men were unmarked. The term “marked” is a principle of linguistic theory that refers to the way language alters the base meaning of a word by adding a linguistic piece that has no meaning on its
Euphemism usually expresses an indirect expression towards someone or something that can be considered harsh or unpleasant. Eleanor
One example of figurative language in Laurie Hale Anderson’s book “Speak” is when Melinda decides to rid her garden of all weeds, and does some spring cleaning after it finally stops raining during May. Around the same time, Melinda is realizing that she wants to make some new changes in her life and in this figurative language example, Melinda’s life is her garden. She decides first to rake the leaves “suffocating the bushes” ; Melinda is ridding the demons from herself on the first layer of her skin. She says that she has to “fight the bushes (her problems)” and the bushes don’t like getting cleaned out but it is something one has to do if one makes
“To produce a mighty book, you must choose a mighty theme.” These were historic words from author Herman Melville. The novel Speak contains the powerful theme of communicating to others even when it may be hard, making Speak a mighty book. In Laurie Halse Anderson’s novel Speak, she describes the life of a freshman in highschool, Melinda Sordino, who has been raped the summer before the school year. She refused to tell her friends that she was raped at the party they were attending, so all of her friends saw her as a whistle blower.
A good example of this would be, “What was that, Saumensch?” (Zusak, 70) This term appears a lot in the book since “Saumensch” is what Rosa likes to call Liesel. This term was what bugged me the most since “Saumensch” is not a nice thing to call someone, as it is an insult to a woman. The male translation would be “Saukerl.”
The party believe that destroying words will inevitably prevent power from slipping through their fingers. Values such as ‘honour, integrity, morality, etc’ cease to exist. In chapter five, Syme explains to Winston, “We’re cutting the language down to the bone. Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year”. Through this quote, it is easy to interpret that ‘Newspeak’ is merely used to restrict the freedom of expression.
Even one small expression can change the meaning of what is being said. Example when
Another rhetorical feature that influences the audience is the use of ambiguity since the words “female”
According to this view, he is expressing the idea that language, as powerful as it is, might not always be efficient enough to explain a sensation. In sum, then, the issue whether language constructs our thought or vice versa. My own view is that language does indeed construct thought. Though I concede that language shapes our thought, I still maintain a view that language might not always be powerful enough in certain situations. I have had several encounters where language has the potential to really hurt someone, or even me.
SLANG 3 The Effect of slang on the English language The records show slang was first used around the 16th Century, but this is not certain, as it more of a spoken language and so it could have been much earlier. At this time people created new words as the English vocabulary was a lot smaller than it is today and so people felt the need to invent new words to express themselves. Nowadays slang is used much more frequently, with the influence of technology having a great effect on the use of slang. Some people think it has a positive effect on the English language, while others think it is having a negative effect.
There are many words that are unaccepted by the society in general and the outside of the group. The word ‘jargon’ comes from an old French word meaning ‘the twittering and chattering of birds’. It came into English in the fourteenth century, when its meaning extended to include ‘meaningless talk’ or ‘gibberish’. The Longman Dictionary of Business English defines jargon as