Can one ever imagine a wife killing her husband? Things like falling down the stairs and dying accidentally do not happen very frequently, so it is believable that Queenie Volupides killed her husband. When Queenie got home one night after partying, she supposedly found her husband dead at the bottom of their stairs. Queenie is guilty because she left the club before her friends left, was drunk when she got home, and she wasn 't trying to help her husband fight for his life. Why would she kill her husband? When Queenie was out partying, she happened to drink a little too much, and she ended up getting drunk. When people are drunk, they tend to do things that they do not really mean to do. It 's as if they are not really themselves. It is possible that she killed her husband, but she just couldn 't remember doing it. Queenie was home alone when the murder happened. Queenie decided that she was ready to go home after a long night of partying, but Queenie’s friends and she wanted one more drink. They all …show more content…
Queenie could be innocent because Arthur was drunk when this happened, so others might think that he really did fall down the stairs. Queenie might not have done anything to help him because maybe she was in shock and didn 't know what to do. She also might have left the club early because she felt that something was wrong because she hadn 't heard from her husband all night. Since Arthur was drunk it 's a big possibility that he fell down the stairs, but the fall probably didn 't kill him. The killing would haft to be blamed on Queenie. In conclusion, after having the facts stated it still seems like Queenie is guilty. She was with Arthur when other people weren 't, and that gave her time to commit the crime. She was drunk when this happens, so it is possible that she didn 't realize what she was doing. The police could use this evidence as a theory of the crime. Queenie could possibly be in a lot of trouble if the crime is
Nobody believe her that she was the killer. Most of the court room judge was all male. So, they didn’t believe that a woman could be able to kill her own family. She was guilty and wasn’t put in jail without any prove that she killed them.
[Posessing] the motive and the murder weapon to commit homicide Elizabeth was justly convicted. On the other hand, there were no witnesses to deny Lindy Chamberlain’s story, and when she was taken in for questioning, investigators reported that she possessed no motives to kill. [Since] Lindy, however, held no evident motive to kill her own, she was deemed innocent. Though it was unknown at the time, dingoes like mothers can
There was an event called Mardi Gras where a group of people came together to celebrate fat Tuesday,a day before Lent day. During this event Jake was murdered,the murder is yet not identified, and all we know is that Mr. Naquin was murdered in the bathroom with a Mardi Gras. It is to my believe that Mr. Naquin was murdered by Ms. Amy La Fleur due to the fact that witnesses mention how they saw Jake leave a minute before Amy did and no one knows where Ms. La Fleur went .
First, Vanessa Vermont had bought a new broiler and she wanted an outlet for it in her kitchen. In the morning she called an electrician to come install it in. His name was James Volta. Next, when the police walked in the kitchen, we saw Vanessa lying on the kitchen floor dead with a fatal head wound. Finally, James said that he never went to the house and said that the husband knew how to hook it up.
He did not mean to kill her and knew he did a horrible thing that would make George mad at him. George had to think about Lennie’s consequences of this, Curley wanted to lynch Lennie but George did not
The opposing side of the argument may say Mary planned on the death of her husband though evidence says otherwise. When Mary went down to the freezer she “took hold of the first object she found” displaying how Mary didn’t deliberately grab a weapon to use on Patrick’s death and his actual killing was not clearly thought-out by Mary, proving diminished capacity and not murder. Mary Maloney deeply loved her husband and her child, through Patricks’ violence push her to her limits. No criminal intent was for sought when Mary’s state of mind obscurely went after Patrick. All in all Mary wasn’t in her right mind whyen all of this took place.
In addition, When Gentlewoman mentions “ I have seen her rise from her bed, throw her nightgown upon her, unlock her closet, take forth paper, fold it, write upon ’t, read it, afterwards seal it, and again return to bed; yet all this while in a most fast sleep”(5.5.4-9). This demonstrates that Lady Macbeth is characterized by the power of guilt owed to the fact that she forced Macbeth to kill Duncan. To add with how Lady Macbeth wanted Duncan dead, Macbeth is no different. When Macbeth mentions that he is guilty by saying "Of all men else I have avoided thee. But get thee back.
Even if she wasn’t seen killing her husband in the beginning, in the eyes of the law, the evidence showed she did. So killing her husband in the end is the same crime. Simple, yeah?
I will argue that Queenie did kill Arthur based on the evidence that suggests she had a motive and opportunity to commit this horror of a crime that was done. The first reason to suspect Queenie is that she had the motive to kill her husband, Arthur. The couple had been arguing earlier that evening, and Queenie left the house in a rage. Her anger and frustration might boil over, leading her to lash out at Arthur.
She has to convince him to do it because she can’t which makes her the blame for the murders. Lady Macbeth is also the blame because she wanted
This shows that lady Macbeth emotionally abused Macbeth, which lead Macbeth to see his wife as very manipulating and threatening. Therefore, she is the true murderer. Even though Macbeth took action and murdered the king, her manipulation of him made it such that she might as well have been holding the knife
Non Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997 section 2 states : " A person shall be guilty of the offence of assault who without lawful excuse intentionally or recklessly :a)directly or indirectly applies force to or causes an impact on the body of another causes another to believe on reasonable grounds that he or she is likely immediately to be subjected to any such force or impact without the consent of the other " . Following this with the incident between Murt and Bernie , Murt agrees to take part in an incident that could cause harm to himself as well as impact from the body of another . However in section 3 A person who assaults another causing him or her harm shall be guilty of an offence . Section 4 then states a person or intentionally
It’s important to know that she still loves her husband even after she killed him. Her feelings went away for a little bit and she did things that she regrets all because of what her husband told her. I wonder what her husband told
She was so paranoid over the ordeal that she eventually killed herself. Even though she died before Macbeth, she still had an influence on what he did. Eventually, it leads to his death and treason. In conclusion, Lady Macbeth is more responsible for King Duncan’s murder, and Macbeth’s treason, than Macbeth himself.
With the idea of Macbeth becoming king, this also means that lady Macbeth will be presented with the title of Queen. As the story progresses the reader learns that Lady Macbeth's actions are equally as terrible as the crimes committed by Macbeth. These crimes all have to do with the couple’s devoted love for power. Lady Macbeth persuades her husband to commit murder and fulfill his ambition. Persuasion is a powerful and threatening tool against those who are weak.