Serfs were the lowest social class and had needs that were essential to them for survival. During the Middle Ages, they lived hard and dangerous lives. They had almost no control of their lives (Richardson). They could not be sold like slaves but they also were not allowed to leave the land (Richardson). Many peasants were forced to leave their own problems and do work for the lord instead (Bennett 103). They were sometimes threatened to do something through intimidation, threats, or pressure (Bennett 125). When other men could buy themselves off with money, peasants had nothing to offer except for the little goods they had (Bennett 125). Serfs had to suffer silently, because no one was powerful enough to speak up (Bennett 125). If serfs …show more content…
Because of the need of survival, most peasants stayed on the land and continued to work (Nardo 25). In order to get what they required, serfs needed to provide their lord with many things. Peasants provided service for the nobles (Richardson). They had to work the land, serve the lord’s house, and pay taxes (Richardson). They gave their service, work, food, and clothing to him (Biel 10). Freemen even gave up the land they had to their lords (Biel 10). On the land, a portion of the fief given to the lord by the king, serfs had to plant and harvest their crops (Nardo 25). They kept some of the food but much automatically went to the lord and his knights (Nardo 25). They were responsible for clothing, feeding, and providing for the upper classes, as well as themselves (Nardo 27). Serfs also received things that were important to them from their lords. Even though the classes above them benefited from most of the work they did, lords and kings were expected to protect them if the land was invaded (Richardson). In return for their work, lords also gave them a share of land, included by the fief to grow their own crops and build houses (Cels 4). Peasants depended on their lord for jobs and security, and in return maintained his manor and kept him supplied food and other goods …show more content…
During the Middle Ages, a military needed to be formed for the king’s protection and survival of the medieval culture. The creation of an army was done by grouping peasants together to support a knight (Lenehan). The farmers that had been grouped together became tied to the land that was connected to the knight (Lenehan). If any of the peasants, the land may be no longer able to support him (Lenehan). The professional warriors depended on the food and produce peasants had through farming and working (Lenehan). The king was provided with armies of knights from lords, allowing him to call the soldiers whenever he was in danger. Lords were able to enlist the military services of former Carolingian, also known as Roman soldiers and tribal warriors (C. Smith ). A lord was expected to supply his king with an army of knights, whenever called upon (Biel 9). A vassal was entitled to a fief as long as he remained loyal (C. Smith ). The fief provided him and his family with land ownership, food, resources, and power over the lower class people who lived in that territory (C. Smith ). Land ownership was the only reliable measure of wealth in medieval society (C. Smith ). Unlike currency or precious metals, it had a permanent value of producing food and other resources (C. Smith ). Because of this, knights generally rose from rich soldiers to wealthy members of the ruling class (Biel 9). Over time, the feudal
Land was pivotal to power and stability across kingdoms, it reinforces loyalty to the lords among peasants especially on manor lands as well as it gave the lords soldiers. Greed was also another component which led to disunity as wealthy landowners wanted more than they bargained for. Link: This disunity among the lords led to sieges and battles. Paragraph 2: (119/132) Sieges – QE, GW, Topic: The struggle for power and land resulted in sieges and battles all across Europe with revolutionary weapons.
To add on, the roles of the peasants was to give their services to nobles. Last but not least, the bottom dwellers
They also had responsibilities. (STEWE-1) They were also in charge of assisting the king when the king required it (Norman 103). (STEWE-2) The nobles took responsibility for parts of the land called fiefs (Norman 103).
On top of the peasants or other lower classes there were
The serfs probably worked the hardest providing food and services when demanded (Doc. 1). They only got one day a week to farm for themselves (Doc. 2). Knights had to provide protection and military service to nobles. They also had to provide a place to stay if their noble visited (OI). Lastly, nobles were expected to provide money and knights to the king (Doc. 1).
The king allowed nobles to have authority over peasants, not only that but the nobles had the choice to do military service; unlike the peasants who had no choice. The king exempt nobles from most taxes, and allowed nobles to collect tolls from people using roads and markets. This allowed many nobles and clergy to live in great luxury chateaux and palaces. Another thing that made the peasants angry was the yearly incomes, the Archbishop of Paris was making 50,000 livres and Marquis de Mannevillette was making 20,000 livres. Meanwhile a typical village priest was making 750 livres and a master carpenter made 200 livres, specifically you can see the yearly income and compare it your self.
The nobles responding with a mockery of the peasants, left the peasants angered and bitter. As such, they started forming private assemblies, where they would preach their views on equality, and plot to revolt against the nobles. A secret report regarding a peasant's assembly shows the nobles views on the matter. “... They believed the rich should share with the poor, especially rich persons who had acquired their property from trade or had otherwise won it from the poor...”
Men farmed their own or nobles land. There were three classes. On the top was the emperor who was supported by the military. 1st was the nobles who were military and government authority. Next were artisans then commoners.
Underneath the nobles and barons, there are knights that are trained from the age of 7. In return for service to the nobles and barons, they are given grants of land. The peasants and serfs are on the bottom of the social system, there are peasants who farm the land in return for shelter and protection (history.com). This compares with
In the Middle Ages, the power of people impacted the society, because of the Feudal System. In other words, the rankings of people. There were four groups. The Kings and Queens were at the top, then the nobles, the knights, and last peasants and serfs(Doc. 1). Serfs and peasants had very little land given and they even had to provide food that they farmed for the knights and nobles.
One of the most important part of Feudal society the oath of Homage and Fealty. The Oath of Homage and Fealty required many things from both the lord and his vassal. The vassal was required to give the king, which he was declaring loyalty to, a certain set of obligations(Nelson). This would provide system between the vassal and the lord that allowed for a smooth economy to run because both the vassal and the king benefit and they have a system of trade. The vassal also had their own set of vassals called sub vassals, that were obligated to give to the vassal in return for a few things.
Kings and lords gave land to knights. In return, the knights promised to serve their lords and fight for them when necessary. Many Knights owned large manors. Peasants and serfs worked on the manors and paid the lords in food. A very similar system existed in Japan.
They had the least wealth and respect but without them the two kingdoms couldn’t continue. There were three sub-categories of peasants in both societies: Farmers were the wealthiest peasants as they had their own land where they would dwell and also harvest crops to sell to the rest of the kingdom. The craftsmen/artisans were the second wealthiest peasants. They would craft armour and weapons and make work with metal and wood. The merchants were the least wealthy of all the peasants because they were completely dependent on other people to give them work.
Nor should it be surprising that one of the leaders of the peasant rebellion of 1297 on the Bec manor of Weedon was none other than John Brockhall, quoted above (p. 106) as a successful accumulator of abbeylands. https://www.questiaschool.com/read/109070648/medieval-england-a-social-history-and-archaeology&sa=D&ust=1456416155675000&usg=AFQjCNEzmCszFv55ptZ49t5Kkx5A_DEE_A Analysis: Serfs worked on land to pay debt (usually rarely getting out) peasants were land hungry, but were discontent and rebelled Relevance: peasants had more of a say than slaves of the time (serfs) Body 3:
Feudalism benefited lords, vassals, and peasants. Lords gained a dependable fighting force in their vassals. Vassals received land for their military service. Peasants were protected by their lords. The lord also built mills to grind grain and blacksmith shops and woodworking shops to make tools.