The United States of America would be a different place without civil disobedience. Breaking the rules is usually considered wrong; however, sometimes there are exemptions to these rules, to fight for a good cause. Much of history was made through civil disobedience. Without it, we would still have slavery. We would have an overpowering government. Luckily, throughout history, citizens have stepped up and fought for their rights. Americans' privacy, security, and quality of life has been improved by breaking the rules. Government often thinks there should be no excuses for breaking the law. This makes sense from a governmental standpoint. However, as a private citizen, sometimes civil disobedience is the only way to protect our rights. For example, in the Fourth Amendment, the Constitution states that we have a right to privacy. Our government has been given power, and sometimes that …show more content…
No, I do not have anything to hide, but I do want to be able to trust the American government without worrying if they are looking at my texts, e-mails, calls, or any other personal data I may have stored on electronic devices. If the Constitution states we, as citizens, have a right to privacy, I expect to be given this right without any infringement. Obviously, this is only one of many examples of civil disobedience. Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. were disobedient to laws. Our world would be different without them standing up to the law. They may have broke the rules, but looking back, everyone would now agree that they took the moral and correct action. There are also many times where civil disobedience is completely wrong. Assassinations, I believe, are never the right way to fix a political problem. Although we may not agree with authority, murdering them is always an immoral choice to make. The positives of one’s actions must outweigh the negatives for one’s civil disobedience to be moral and truly make a
Martin Luther King Jr once stated, “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” in his Letter from Birmingham Jail in 1963. He was invoking the principle of civil disobedience. He wasn't justifying breaking laws just because, but instead, meant that you break the law and accept your punishment, in hopes that people will come to see that the law is unethical. Civil disobedience plays an important role in how our society has been shaped up until this point.
It's easy to get angry and/or violent protests confused with civil disobedience. Many overlook the effectiveness of civil disobedience and see it as just another way to protest the government but civil disobedience has a long history. A few examples of civil disobedience include Rosa Parks’ famous refusal to move from the back of the bus in 1955; the interracial marriage between Richard and Mildred Loving in 1958; and most recently, the protest against the Dakota Access pipeline construction. In each instance, people stood up for what they thought was just and right.
Civil disobedience can mean many things to many people. To some people it could mean a non-violent means of protesting or attempting to achieve political goals; however, in the eyes of people like Martin Luther King Jr it could be different. He stated that “one has the moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws”. Martin Luther King Jr prove this by doing many non-violent protest during his time, to fight against segregation. The meaning of civil disobedience is a bit different in Henry Thoreau’s eyes.
Some wonder what Civil Disobedience is and what it is all about. Civil Disobedience is an effective, selfacknowledged denial to obey certain laws, requirements and orders of the government or an occupying worldwide power. Around in 1846 a man named Henry David Thoreau wrote an essay over Civil Disobedience. He wrote this while he sent the night in jail because he had failed to pay 6 years worth of delinquent poll taxes(Resistance to Civil Government) . He would bicker with the people saying he couldn’t pay the funds that helped to assist the US government 's war with Mexico, nor could he pay a government that still allowed slavery in its Southern states.
When riots break out, it can cause people to feel threatened and anger others even more so than they would have been in the first place. This results in a very negative impact on people's perceptions of whatever cause this riot may have been a result of. By encouraging peaceful encounters and staying civil, it can show others that something is wrong enough with the world and society that people are willing to stand up, step out, and possibly get in trouble for doing what they believe is right. In a free society like the one we have in the United States of America, disobedience of any kind is generally looked down upon, civil or not. If more people would be willing to look at civil disobedience in a different light, the world could change for the
Civil Disobedience In the dictionary civil disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest, but Thoreau and Martin Luther King have their own beliefs to civil disobedience. In Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” he writes about the need to prioritize one’s conscience over the dictates of laws. Martin Luther King uses civil disobedience as something that effectuates change in the government. Both Thoreau and Martin Luther King has similar yet different perspectives on civil disobedience.
Some of the rules in the working place, school, and in the society might violate the moral concept. Civil disobedience is thus an ideal tool that we can utilize to share our views and opinions on the issues affecting the entire community. The use of this approach will surely help the state in recognizing the needs of the
Civil disobedience against unjust laws allows people to recognize the faults in our society and government. This is especially true when large numbers of people come together to protest for a certain cause, and against a law, they believe the government should not enforce. For example, Mahatma
However, it could also be argued that civil disobedience is beneficial to ridding a society of unjust law. If there is law, you have a duty as a citizen to obey the law or you may try to convince those in charge to change them. If using civil disobedience is a method of convincing others to change unjust law, civil disobedience must be unjust. If it is true that being a citizen of a society binds you to obeying the laws, and civil disobedience is an act which breaks the law, then it is not just for
Today we are all called to enact on our own civil disobedience when we are faced with injustice and unfair laws, we are called to make a stand and a declaration to stand up for what we believe
People's justification to engage in civil disobedience rests on the unresponsiveness that their engagement to oppose an unjust law receives. People who yearn for a change in a policy might sometimes find themselves in a dead end because their “attempts to have the laws repealed have been ignored and legal protests and demonstrations have had no success” (Rawls 373). What Rawls says is that civil disobedience is a last option to oppose an unjust law; therefore, providing civil disobedients with a justification for their cause. Civil disobedience is the spark of light that people encountered at the dead end and they hope that this spark of light will illuminate to show that an unjust law should not exist at all. Martin Luther King, Jr, in his “Letter from
That is actually how it impacts our society today. Opinions are different, thoughts are different, morals are different. The only thing the same, is the laws. We abide by the Constitution of the United States. I don't believe that civil disobedience affects our society either negatively or positively, but both.
Using nonviolent resistance does not include killing off anyone that doesn’t share the same opinion, it is simply protesting to prove and persuade a need for change. Also, peacefully protesting attracts attention from all over the world; thus, educating more people about a serious issue in society. If no one takes action, no one will realize the problem and it’ll only continue to grow. Also, many political leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, Rosa Parks, and Martin Luther King, Jr. are extremely known for their delightful use of civil disobedience. Even better, all of them were successful in bringing about a change in society.
“You must be the change you wish to see in the world” These astonishing words that Mahatma Gandhi said made me suppose that Civil Disobedience is a Moral Responsibility of a citizen because when breaking certain laws, a citizen perhaps incorporate a good intention or a bad intention for breaking it. Citizens break the law occasionally to have their beliefs be heard so change can be assemble. Some ways that Civil Disobedience can be a Moral Responsibility would be breaking the law for the right intentions. An example of breaking the law for the right intentions could be The Salt March that Gandhi Created or, Rosa Parks standing up for her beliefs about her actions, MLK wanting equal rights with caucasian. Illegal Immigrants coming into the
Throughout decades, most of citizens cannot grasp the concept of the purpose and the importance of Civil Disobedience. According to John Rawls, an American moral and political philosopher, he (1971) states that “civil disobedience is a public, non-violent and conscientious breach of law undertaken with the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government policies. On this account, people who engage in civil disobedience are willing to accept the legal consequences of their actions, as this shows their fidelity to the rule of law. Civil disobedience, given its place at the boundary of fidelity to law, is said to fall between legal protest, on the one hand, and conscientious refusal, revolutionary action, militant protest and organized forcible resistance, on the other hand.” Therefore,