The Puritans brought with them their “strict and somber way of life” when they developed colonies in the newly-found continent of America (Miller 4). And a series of witch trials dominated the theocratic Salem during the late Seventeenth Century. These hearings were a manifestation of the clash between vengeance and honesty, where, based on the now ancient traditions, one’s reputation mattered more than their life. This story is portrayed in Arthur Miller’s Tragedy “The Crucible,” in which the characters’ names are “subjected to very high temperatures” in a “metal container,” where their true colors are shown. These names, which are considered of utmost importance in the community, eventually created a paradox; a paradox caused by the will …show more content…
For the duration of the story, Parris is looked upon as someone whose only concern is him being overthrown, without any remorse for his own daughter or his niece. He only thinks of them as being “thankful for being permitted to walk straight,” and he has no interest in “children, or talent with them” (Miller 3,4). The true test between his reputation and his integrity is shown before and during the witch trials. Instead of worrying about his daughter who is supposedly near death, Parris is concerned about how his “enemies will bring [the forest dancing event] out,” and how his “ministry’s at stake” (Miller 10,11). Subsequently, to save his name by taking the burden of justifying the forest incident, he complies with his niece’s false accusations, and as a religious figure, sets chaos in Salem. Eventually, during the trials, he continuously makes himself look superior by denigrating the accused, especially John Proctor. Parris utters on about how Proctor “is mischief” and the he came “to overthrow the court” (Miller 88, 92). And his individualistic nature, represented by the golden candlesticks, eventually destroyed his own life, as he lost all his savings, along with many innocents …show more content…
Along with Judge Hathorne, Danforth attempted to cease the news of rebellions, like the one in Andover, by exhibiting his tyrannical reputation which he gained from governing the colonies. To repeal Francis Nurse’s arguments on the girls’ treachery, Danforth exclaims on about how “four hundred are in jails from Marblehead to Lynn” and “seventy-two condemned to hang” by his signature (Miller 87). He tries safeguard the judicial system by instilling fear into the hearts of the innocent and the frail, like Nurse and Corey, without thinking about their concerns. He rules the court with an iron fist and states how his decisions are just, which, ironically, sends the accused to jail. “We burn a hot fire[which] melts all concealment,” he declared, and “no uncorrupted man may fear the court” (Miller 89, 98). However, his trust on the court and superstition instead of proper evidence, and with his reputation in jeopardy, clouded his judgement. This personality of his eventually led to several jailed under his decree, with his name and the name of the court under pressure. He tried to cease the opposition to the law by saving Proctor, but to no avail. Even though Danforth tried to be just in every aspect, who would “hang ten thousand that dares to raise against the law,” his will to save the name of the government instead of
Reverend Parris is a man in his 40’s that is a minister of the town, and lives with his daughter, Betty, and his niece, Abigail, in Salem, Massachusetts. He finds Abigail and Betty in the woods dancing around a fire with Tituba, and practicing what he thinks is witchcraft. As he finds them dancing around the fire and practicing what he thinks is witchcraft, because of his reputation of being the minister of the town, he hopes that no one will find out about what he has seen and potentially ruin his reputation. Throughout The Crucible by Arthur Miller Parris goes through ups and downs with the town and the townspeople. “Abigail, I have fought here three long years to bend these stiff-necked people to me, and now, just now when some good respect is rising for me in the parish, you compromise my very character” (Miller 1263).
He has been instrumental in these witch trials by spreading gossip and accusing innocent people for his own benefit. Parris had many detractors from the beginning. His selfishness and favoritism rubbed men like Proctor the wrong way. By act 4 the general population of Salem was tired of the hysteria and thus tired of Parris. Reverend Parris, a selfish, hypocritical and petty man, once a prominent and wealthy minister of the community, is by Act 4 reduced to a financially broken man, disillusioned and
He is presented as a harsh and domineering judge, apparently conflated with William Stoughton, who is not even named in Miller’s play. In reality, Danforth is recorded as being critical of the conducts of the trials, and played a role in bringing them to an
Introduction John Proctor, Abigail Williams, Reverend John Hale, and Elizabeth Proctor. When you hear these names, what do you think of? Well, it should be the Salem Witch Trials. The Crucible, read in a large amount of high schools around the nation, popularized this ever so interesting topic. Despite The Crucible being a famous playwright’s take on The Salem Witch Trials, it isn’t so much off from the truth.
The crucible, based during the Salem, Massachusetts witch trials of 1692. A constant theme through out the play is your personal reputation, maintaining a good name. Judge Danforth a well respected man in the society that has the supreme rule over the court. He is known for making the right decisions and never going against them. Innocent and guilty people have been put to death underneath his Judgement, to him this demonstrates his superiority and power.
His own worries are expressed when Parris exclaims, “But if you trafficked with the spirits in the forest I must know it now, for surely my enemies will and they will ruin me with it”(Miller 1131). He knows that if people were to find out, he could lose everything he worked for. Therefore, Parris does everything in his power to at least prove someone guilty, and in the process, completely goes against the morals he teaches. He is seen as a Godly man who is supposed to teach integrity. However, instead he becomes a man that cares less about the truth and more of preserving his own
In The Crucible, John Proctor the protagonist, becomes a victim of the witch trials when his wife Elizabeth, is accused of witchcraft. In order to free his wife, Proctor must convince Judge Danforth of his wife’s innocence. Judge Danforth does not sign condemnations lightly and takes meticulous inspection of his cases to determine the guilty party. He is also a highly religious man who takes matters between God and men seriously. It is because of Danforth’s dedication to the law and God that Proctor utilizes ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade him.
We often seen someone is only care about himself, they don’t care about others even their family and they always have excuse of it. Reverend Parris is a kind of this person. “The Crucible” is about the Salem witch trials. Starting with several young girls claim to be afflicted by witchcraft and then accuse people in the town of witchcraft. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller shapes Parris’s character as a very selfish person, and everything he did was to keep his good reputation in the village and to get rid of anyone against him, which drives him mad.
Based on Miller’s allegory in The Crucible on the McCarthy hearings is that Parris was an unfair judge. Parris is displayed in court as an accuser, he accuses the victims until they either give in or give up on defending themselves. He is one of the instigators of the trials and their proceedings. Witches represent communists, he is accusing people and over and over, feeding those who confess information discreetly, so they accuse those that are innocent for personal revenge. When in Act 3 Parris says, “This is a clear attack on the court!”
Integrity is an essential piece of heroism, this can especially be seen in the novel "The Crucible" as the two ideals of integrity and heroism collide. Many different conclusions could be made from reading this novel when it comes to both integrity and heroism. While there are characters like John Proctor whom exhibits heroism through integrity, selflessness, and bravery, there are other characters whom sacrifice their own integrity in order to preserve their own imagine. These characters are portrayed as dynamic villains like Reverend Parris and Abigail Williams and others like Salem's own Sheriff whom is less dynamic and a greater linear character. Each individual's integrity would change constantly throughout the story due to a constant stacking of lies, all of which is rooted to one's struggle to keep a good image by forfeiting her own integrity.
An example of this is when John Procter is accused he had to confess or he would have been hanged and when he confessed it was not enough for Danforth. Danforth wanted Proctor to sign a confession “Come then, sign your testimony” (cite). He says this even though Procter has made it obvious that he is confessing to a crime he did not commit. Danforth does not care about this though he only wants Procter to confess to secure his own reputation and so his authority does not go into question. This as well as most of the actions that took place during the trials shows how corrupt Danforth was and that all the people who died in the name of the “law” really died to secure Danforth’s own idea of
Mary admitted that, “it were pretense”, ( Miller p85). John Proctor told Danforth that what he wanted is Elizabeth to be freed and the truth to come out, but Judge Danforth was so certain in his calling to expose the Devil he could not accept this. Danforth thought that Proctor had an ulterior motive which was to, as Danforth says, “undermine the court”, meaning he believed Proctor wanted to subvert the course of justice, or Danforth’s idea of justice. Judge Danforth also displayed signs of self obsession when Giles Corey and Francis Nurse came to Danforth to explain how well thought of members of the community their accused wives are, and that there was no way they could possibly be capable of such a thing, and that there was proof Danforth said, “Do you know who I am Mr. Nurse?”, (Miller p83). Judge Danforth was not capable of taking judgement in his field of expertise and was furious that anybody would even dare to question him.
Reverend Parris shows the first example of the importance of reputation in the Salem. In Act I, lines 63-66, Parris discovers the girls dancing in the forest; he recognizes the threat of witchcraft that has formed in his
Parris’ fickle persona throughout Miller’s play, which reflects his interest in self-security, contrasts his desire for safety with his requirement to be reasonable through his reversal of his word. Originally, Miller crafts Parris’ character in opposition of the Witch Trials because Parris does not want to be associated with such a sin. However, when the Witch Hunt becomes a mark of fame, Parris
John Proctor never settles for keeping his opinion or what he thinks is right to himself. He knows telling Danforth that he is guilty for adultery won’t help his cause but it shows his desperation to win the case in order protect his wife, Elizabeth. John Proctor was sick and tired of watching Abigail win with a lie, in this case he spoke the truth knowing his consequences. John states, “Excellency, forgive me, forgive me. She thinks to dance with me on my wife’s grave!