Don Hendrix
Professor J. Boyles
Eng-111
20 April 2017
Is Space Exploration Worth the Cost?
Since 1969 when Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin, and Michael Collins landed on the moon, space exploration has intensified in the recent days with the developed countries competing to send astronauts into space. The US government allocates billions to space navigation each year to fund the scientific undertakings needed to make the entire process a success. The overarching question in the whole phenomenon is whether the benefits accrued from these space voyages are worth the expenses put in them. Asked why he kept climbing Mt. Everest, George Mallory, an English mountaineer replied, “Because it was there” (Billings 162). According to Mallory, exploration is an innate predisposition in all men; it is the nature of all people to keep discovery new things with an aim to fuel curiosity, creativity, and inspiration.
Virtually all developments happening in all places around the globe occur because of man’s curiosity to explore and discover new things that he doesn’t know about. Then comes the question of benefits and the cost implications. Mallory explored Mt. Everest occasionally and wouldn’t stop because he drew inspiration from
…show more content…
That is, the decisions must be made in consideration of the other available options. In the case of space exploration, therefore, we would consider other viable options which could lead to the same results attained from space explorations as has been highlighted in the previous sections. Based on the goal of enhancing the understanding about human life and increasing the probability of lengthening human survival on earth, there could be other more cost-effective options available for consideration than space
Doug worked two different jobs to afford to go on the trip to Everest, and was making his second attempt to reach the summit of Everest. Doug came back to Everest to try and reach the summit for the first time. Because Doug failed to reach the summit on his first attempt, I argue that Doug Hansen’s primary motivation
The courage to venture into the unknown is a quality found in the hearts of those who bring opportunity into our world. This pure, unblemished faith is seen in revered explorers throughout history. Marco Polo, Ferdinand Magellan, Lewis and Clark, and Neil Armstrong were each faced with impossible tasks, and each enlightened humanity through their endeavors. Our restrictive sphere of knowledge is grappled with by these individuals, is twisted and expanded, constantly in a motion opposed by skeptics and traditionalists. How brave, how courageous these heroes are, to see the world as it is, and to transform into what they envision it to be.
In order to accomplish his purpose, the writer of this speech used diction and tone to show sorrow for the families of the men and women whose lives were lost on the Columbia and organized the speech by talking about how the lives lost will not affect moving forward in space advances. The writer expresses his grief for the family by using “great sadness” and naming the seven astronauts who died on this mission. While setting a tone of grief for these astronauts families, George W. Bush also organizes the speech by talking about how the men and women knew the risks of their travel. He first explains his feelings of loss and mourning for the men and women who lost their lives, but also says that this tragedy will not be a setback for space travel.
Similarly to how the pioneers once undertook the task to expand colonial America into the uncharted, unknown western territory, scientists “move deep into a wilderness region where they know almost nothing, where the very tools and techniques needed to clear the wilderness, to bring order to it, do not exist”. The uncertainty of what lay beyond civilization, of what the foreign region rendered, had been undermined with the idea of fulfilling the doctrine of Manifest Destiny. Likewise, the pursuit of an extension of knowledge and understanding of what is unknown and a cultivation of scientific resources draws scientists forward. The comparison between these two entities serves the purpose to reiterate Barry’s opening paragraph statement; obstacles and breakthroughs cannot be possible if not for the courage to accept our innermost
Exploration is the act of searching for the purpose of discovery of information or resources. Exploring was exactly what drove the thrill in Lewis and Clark’s life. Having been given a chance by Thomas Jefferson, the current president at the time, they both joined together and brought each of their skills to help accomplish the journey they 've been requested to take. Having each of their strengths combined they needed a crew to make the trek successful. Lewis wondered through the deep thicket of the uncharted land when Clark fixed his eyes across the rivers and rich earth untouched lands mapping every thing he could imagine.
He envisioned a goal of backpacking throughout the wild to reach Alaska. He wanted to find his true happiness and beauty of discovering the undiscovered. People find this intriguing because they would ultimately have the same potential in finding who they are without others controlling them. A researcher from Canadian Geographic has studied and tested the mindfulness of his retreat into the wild admitting “My urge and opportunity, might use to reflect on their own lives and relation to nature and perhaps find there more spaciousness and meaning” (Kull). Bob Kull was able to capture a sense of the wilderness and capture moments of how he was able to envision his life in the open.
The experience of relentless action itself is where one could conceivably find refuge, as even when the destination is reached, no further refuge is found. Simultaneously, while the author of Into The Wild, Jon Krakauer, depicted his experience as an adventurous youth, he also mentioned his perspective of actuality concerning the journey’s real association with refuge when he emphasizes how “It is easy, when you are young, to believe that what you desire is no less than what you deserve, to assume that if you want something badly enough, it is your God-given right to have it. When I decided to go to Alaska that April, like Chris McCandless, I was a raw youth who mistook passion for insight and acted according to an obscure, gap-ridden logic. I thought climbing the Devil's Thumb would fix all that was wrong with my life. In the end, of course, it changed almost nothing.
Another primary reason The Space Race worsened the tension between the U.S. and the Soviets was the attempts from both nations to establish deadly nuclear weapons in space using rockets. This can be exemplified, again by the fact that the Venera that was launched in February 12, 1961 and Vostok that was launched in April 12, 1961 were all launched launched using an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) to enter space. (History.com Staff *3) The United States’ fear of the soviets using ICBM’s can be seen in the speech my Dwight D. Eisenhower where he addresses Science in National Security. In Eisenhower’s speech after he talks about the the Venera and how it was launched using an ICBM, he says, “The Soviets continue to concentrate on the
From Krakauer’s letter to the reader, we have a basic understanding of his immense personal grief as the result of a tragedy on Mount Everest and the reason for writing the book. Then instead of jumping right into the narrative from the very beginning, Krakauer starts in the middle– the time and day when he reached the peak of Mount Everest and returned, and how eight others couldn’t do the same. This interlude first shocked me but also prepared me for what was to come. Most are unaware of what occurs at Mount Everest but this book awakens those who are oblivious, including myself. The book was incredibly informative, starting right from the beginning when the author gives the complete history of those attempting to reach the top of the world.
, it is important to note that the characters portrayed in this book are real people. The unique conditions and the weather of the setting forced the climbers to make choices that they could not have made in a different situation. The tough choices made by the climbers and the setting influenced the result of the story. Krakauer’s tone for the most part is respectful toward the guides and climbers, and he narrates as objectively as possible, while including his own concerns and doubts. His tone in the beginning expresses excitement and nervousness, but later turns into
Should we spend taxpayer money to invest in the space program? The space program is a program to pioneer the future in space exploration. The program has consumed about 18.4 billion dollars on trying to explore the barren and empty place they call space. This money that 's used on this space exploration comes from our taxpayers.
• I want you to stop for your second and look at the person sitting next to you. What you are looking at is the fine result of over 200 thousand years of evolution; the master piece of natural selection, and a perfectly adapted organism to life on earth. • But with exponential grow in technological advances, unpredictable climate change or even space exploration.
Space has helped hone the skills of scientist. By using satellite technology for space, they were able to use the same concept for Earth. Even with all the benefits of space, its major down falls are cost, risks, and low chances of reward for their efforts. Many space explorations cost fortunes with little to come out of it, making it almost seem not worth it. The risk is another key factor, with little known about the majority of space, many outliers can appear out of nowhere and can cause death to anyone that happens to be working up there.
Introduction Once a government monopoly, today space travel has now been expanded to private corporations. The resulting pros and cons have left the international community with questions to answer and decisions to make on the use of private companies in space. The privatization of space endeavors have brought on exciting new opportunities.
Specialized organizations have been spending money on space exploration for a significant amount of time , resulting in many criticisms from the people. Times change ,however,and we must consider the convenience of such trips. Is it often said that, costs of funding space programs are tremendously high , and they could be alternatively utilized to assist those struggling on Earth. This may be partly true ; nevertheless ,many people work on these programs. As a result , unemployment around the globe has significantly decreased, therefore improving the lives of many.