The Nevada State Constitution has nineteen articles. The U.S. Constitution only has seven. The significant purpose behind why the Nevada Constitution is longer than the U.S. Constitution is best explained through national sovereignty and state sovereignty. To understand where both sovereignties derived from a brief gloss over on how state constitution was implemented and how the U.S. Constitution was put into service is necessary. Before the Revolutionary War started the colonies in America were beginning to become restless and angry over the abuse of power that the British Parliament served to them through unfair taxes and acts back in England. In retaliation to the British’s heavy handed actions, a Continental Congress was created by “delegates …show more content…
Constitution compared to the lack of state authority mentioned. The reason being is that at the time the states were expected to hold their power. Thus, states are given sovereignty by the reserved power in the tenth amendment, which states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” (The Constitution). This amendment not only acknowledges that the states have a handle on domestic affairs within the state before the ratification of the U.S. Constitution but also gives the states control of police powers and ordinary daily matters of the citizens. So, the significance behind why Nevada’s Constitution is longer than the U.S. Constitution is because states weren’t given specific sovereignty and the federal government was, which allows the states to oversee daily matters within the state and with the citizens. Such as: conduct of local, state and national elections, established republican forms of government, criminal laws and insurance laws, build and maintain infrastructure, administer family laws, provide education, tax estate and inheritance, protect public health, safety, and property rights, regulate occupations, professions, intrastate commerce, bank, credit, charity and land use, and conduct public works. States have more intimate connections to the land they govern and to the citizens of the …show more content…
Due to the excitement of the Union supporters at the chance statehood and eager to make it before the Presidential election in November, the whole Nevada constitution was telegrammed over to Washington D.C. in an effort to hasten the process. Of course, there was also a fact that the occupied land in Nevada mostly consisted of republicans, which would benefit Lincoln in his re-election. The document was ratified two months later on September 7 1864 and thus the Silver State was born. On the day of all hallows eve, President Abraham Lincoln declared Nevada a state in 1864. The culture of Nevada with the main occupations of mining, gambling and nuclear weapons testing helped shape the structure of the constitution of the state throughout the years. Mining was the first profession that started the state up and for decades after continued to do so. For example, in article ten section five sub section three of the Nevada Constitution it states, “Each patented mine or mining claim must be assessed and taxed as other real property is assessed and taxed, except that no value may be attributed to any mineral known or believed to underlie it, and no value may be attributed to the surface of a mine or claim if one hundred dollars’ worth of labor has been actually performed on the mine or claim during the year preceding the assessment” (Bowers 113). This is to inspire people and companies to seek out mining privileges rather than
The Nevada Constitution was approved in September 1864 (“The Constitution of the State of Nevada”). Nevada’s constitution “very much reveals the... context of the time, in its provisions” (“Nevada Constitution Lecture” 0:05:06-0:05:14). As this document was created during the Civil War, “no event affected the Nevada Constitution’s tone and content more that the Civil War” (“The Civil War and Nevada” 94). Some of this content focused on the Civil War strengthened the document, but some weakened it.
When the delegates of the 1875-1876 Texas Constitutional Convention came together, their main priority in drawing up a new constitution was to restrict the amount of power the state government had over Texans. After Texas suffered thought the corruption that occurred under the previous governor, Edmund J. Davis, the delegates wanted to ensure that a similar situation would never happen again. The first step they took towards that goal was writing a bill of rights, which would be the first article of the constitution. This article ensured that the people’s rights would be protected from the government such as “guaranteed liberty of speech and press, the right of the accused to obtain bail and to be tried by a jury, and the right of citizens to keep and bear arms.”
According to Wolf v Colorado (1949) wolf’s attorneys case was that since the evidence that was obtained and used against him in court was not lawfully obtained it should not be admissible due to the fact that if it was a federal case automatically it would not have been admissible. So it did not make sense that it would be different for the state courts. The case was controversial because the Fourth Amendment does not clearly state that the states must follow the due process law of the Fourth Amendment. “Unlike the specific requirements and restrictions placed by the Bill of Rights (Amendments I to VIII) upon the administration of criminal justice by federal authority, the Fourteenth Amendment did not subject criminal justice in the
Under the Constitution, states and the government both have different duties and both shared large responsibilities. When events such as Shay’s Rebellion occurred, the lack of national power prevented quick and efficient responses to problems in the nation. These issues highlighted the inefficiency of the Articles of Confederation and the need for a national army that could quickly resolve issues. Each state was dealing with its own problems and searching for its own solutions. As Abraham Lincoln later said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”
(https://history.state.gov). The reason being for the Articles to be created was because of how unorganized the states were handling power. It wasn’t until 1777 that Congress came together and “realized that they should have some clearly written rules for how they were organized.” (www.ushistory.org).
The 1864 Nevada Constitution is lengthier than the US Constitution. The Nevada Constitution has been amended over 130 times which gives us a perspective on the
Virginia Plan was created by James Madison but presented to the Constitutional Convention by Edmund Randolph, Governor of Virginia in the year of 1787. The Virginia Plan was about a new form of government and called for the number of votes each state would receive would be based on the population instead of each state receiving just one vote. James Madison and other 56 delegates met in Philadelphia in May 1787, they wanted to make amendments in the Articles of Confederation. They were successful and managed to create a new constitution and as James Madison was representing Virginia, he had become the chief recorder of information. Virginia Plan served as that basis for debate in the development of the U.S. Constitution.
Nine states had to ratify for the Constitution to go in effect, not all agreed with the ratification. The United States Government overcame the weakness of the Articles of Convention
constitution would be the length and structure. The U.S. Constitution is longer in length than the Maryland Constitution. The U.S. Constitution is longer because it contains more information, laws, etc. It must be longer since it is the “supreme law of the land” and has jurisdiction over the whole United States. Their structures are also very different, the U.S. Constitution is more complex than the Maryland Constitution.
The U.S. Constitution fixed the imbalance between the state and national government. It established Congress, which was made up of the U.S. Senate with two representatives
The Texas Constitution is similar to the U.S. Constitution in many ways. One of the many ways is that both have a Bill of Rights, and the Texas constitution embodies certain ideas from the U.S. Bill of Rights, which are that all free men are declared to have free and equal rights that cannot be taken away because of sex, race, color, creed, or national origin. Another way they are related is because they both have a constitutional law for the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial department. The U.S. Constitution has two virtues; brevity and flexibility. The Texas Constitution in the other hand, does not, the U.S. Constitution is limited to 7 short articles and 27 amendments.
After two years, all thirteen states ratify the Articles of the Constitution. The Constitution is made of the preamble and seven different articles. The preamble first three words “We the People” created this constitution to establish a government. The articles are the foundation for how the U.S government is organized. Article l, gives Congress limits and powers, giving them the right to make laws.
Did you know that New Hampshire was the first of the original 13 colonies to declare independence from Great Britain? Actually, New Hampshire has always been a unique state. In some cases it seems like the rest of the nation follows New Hampshire's example. It is very interesting to see how the founding, formation, life, and laws have shaped New Hampshire into what is has become over the years. New Hampshire was originally founded in 1623, only three years after the pilgrims landed in New World and began the Plymouth Plantation.
Specifically, they discussed the situation of the Intolerable Acts that the British Parliament enforced on Boston due to the incident of the Boston Tea Party. One of the results of this First Continental Congress was the delegates explained to King George III that there were issues with how the colonies were being treated. The delegates told King George III that if he didn’t put an end to the Intolerable Acts,
Depending on the state, the many components of a constitution can vary drastically. Laws and legislation were all written with the same purpose: serve the good of the people. However, since the state constitutions were written by and for different groups of people, these documents tended to be somewhat radical or conservative in nature. The constitutions of New Hampshire, Vermont, New York, and Delaware indicate that some states are very generous and progressive in terms of the number and type of policies, while others are very reserved and traditional. Some states were considered to be very radical for the time, and often had a constitution that focused on giving the power to the people.