James M. McPherson is the Author of the Book entitled What They Fought 1861-1865 For, in his introduction McPherson explains that he “…carved from research for a larger book tentatively entitled Why They Fought.” (McPherson, 1994) This is a book that elucidates the attitude of the soldiers that fought during the Civil War, it discusses their Honor and courage, masculinity, discipline, religion, their fear, pain, and death among others. In his synopsis, McPherson says that his book “…gives voice to the very men who risked their lives in this struggle and places them in the great and terrible choir of a country dived against itself.” (McPherson, 1994) What They fought For 1861-1865 is divided into three chapters; Chapter one: “The Holy Cause …show more content…
It was a second war to acquire the freedom anticipated by America. The Civil War began in April 12, 1861 and ended in May 9, 1865. The Revolutionary War and Civil War are often compared in the book by the participant soldiers; “a captain in the 5th Alabama Infantry wrote to his mother: “How trifling where the wrongs complained of by our Revolutionary forefathers, in comparison with ours! If the mere imposition of a tax could raise such a tumult what should be the result of the terrible system of oppression instituted by the Yankees?” (McPherson, 1994) Yankees whom are often described as tyrants and did not want to see the south prosper. Jefferson Davis claimed that the war was for the states, and that the “…South needed to defend itself against a “tyrannical majority…” (i.e. Shi & Tindall, 2015, p. 465) It is often mention that many did not know what they were fighting for, like a Texas private who wrote, “we are fighting for matters real and negotiable… our property and our homes” (McPherson, 1994) , but Lincoln frequently said that the main goal was to restore the Union. What did he mean by restoring the union? His idea was rejected by most of the Confederate states because they thought that Lincoln was lying. They believed that Lincoln’s goal was to end slavery. …show more content…
If I could save the Union without freeing any slaves I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others I would also do it” (i.e. Shi & Tindall, 2015, p. 465) To which the confederate states did not agree to. In “The Best Government on God’s Footstool” chapter the question remains unlock, what or why they were fighting for? In the Civil War, there were two sides North and South, and the first question asked in chapter two is “Why did the North fight?” (McPherson, 1994) It was understandable of why the south fought, they fought for their independence, property and way of life, for their survival as a nation but the North didn’t seem to have the need to struggle for four years. The North lost 360,000 lives and the untold resources that were indefinable, yet a Confederates who said they fought for the same goals as their forebears of 1776 would have been surprised by the intense convictions of northern soldiers they were upholding the legacy of the American Revolution” (McPherson, 1994) The Gettysburg Address gives a wide view of why the North was fighting, Abraham Lincoln’s Most famous speech, but considerate a failure at the time given. In the Gettysburg Address speech, Lincoln summarizes the reason why there was a war sever years prior to the Civil war, he says that our Father
Lincoln wanted them to look at what they were saying and doing to the other side and how they actually were all very similar. All of the American people wanted a new Nation, the South wanted one with slavery and the North wanted one that worked in cohesion with one another. Lincoln encouraged them to look at these things and find a way within themselves to live as one united Nation. Lincoln wanted people on both sides to honor the people who fought and died as one and to recognize their sacrifice even if it was for the other side. He wanted to make sure they did not die in vain and that the citizens did not forget them in the wake of the changing country.
The Civil War. Louis P. Masur’s book, The civil War: a Concise History, Is a book that gives an overview of the civil war from 18 to 1800, Providing multiple causes an consequences that emerged from the war. The book begins by reviewing the origins of the war. Chapter one covers the issues between northern and southern states and the tension over right and slave possession. The tension created a conflict that raised a number of political, social, and military events that then proceeded into a battle to abolish slavery from the colonies.
Question 1: McPherson and Horwitz have differentiating arguments on the Civil War. In McPherson’s interpretation, he explains who the war “redefined the United States” and list the reasons why it would be considered a total war and how it ended with the founding of essentially a new nation. Horwitz has a bit different viewpoint. He questions the necessity of the war, points out the fact the North did not fight to abolish slavery, and becomes upset of the legacy of the Civil War soldiers.
At the outset of the Civlil War, Lincoln originally wanted to limit the amount of bloodshed and destruction as much as humanly possible. The goal was not to destroy the south, or to engage in any prolonged warfare costing valuable lives and resources for the Union. “Erring secessionist staes were to be taken back into the Union, and Southern society was to be reshaped (80).” McGovern further adds that “The authoirty of the national government was to be reestablished by respecting, not abusing, the constitutional rights of the rebels (80).”
Union soldiers fought to protect the Union. Further along in the war, more Union soldiers fought to abolish slavery. As the Confederacy was trying to keep slavery and their own nation, the Union was trying to unify them all and make it more like the United States today. “He had believed that it was a mere question of getting over an unpleasant matter as quickly as possible, and he ran desperately, as if pursued for a murder.” (Crane 77.)
A Band of Brothers, By James M. McPherson The Civil War, which started in April 1861, was the war in which changed American History eternally. It consisted of extremely ordinary, inexperienced men fighting a battle that was much bigger than them, and existed long before their time. While most of the men fighting in the war were mere volunteers, with no battle experience, they were expecting to simply fight, win, and return home with no impediments. This was clearly not the case. The article, A Band of Brothers, distinctly describes the men's pure intention for not only joining the Confederate, and Union army, but remaining in it, when it became clear it was not going to be an effortless, minute battle.
The story Killer Angels provides an in-depth perspective of both Confederate and Union soldiers during the Civil War. The author, Michael Shaara, accomplishes a special feat due to the fact that throughout the novel he rarely breaks away from the factual aspects of America's bloodiest war. The Civil War had seemingly various causes despite numerous soldiers and outsiders believing it was entirely about slavery. The Union and Confederates weren't just fighting over the rights and ideas of slavery, they were fighting for much more. It was a power struggle.
The United States Civil War is possible one of the most meaningful, bloodstained and controversial war fought in American history. Northern Americans against Southern Americans fought against one another for a variety of motives. These motives aroused from a wide range of ideologies that stirred around the states. In James M. McPherson’s What they fought for: 1861-1865, he analyzes the Union and Confederate soldier’s morale and ideological components through the letters they wrote to love ones while at war. While, John WhiteClay Chambers and G. Kurt Piehler depict Civil War soldiers through their letters detailing the agonizing battles of war in Major Problems in American Military History.
The American Civil War, the culmination of the growing tensions between the proslavery and the antislavery, occurred from 1861 to 1865. In his book, Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution, James M. McPherson considered the civil war as the Second American Revolution. In this, revolution can be defined as the overthrowing of a governing system for a new and better one. McPherson also noted that Charles A. Beard, an influential American historian, argued that the overthrow of slavery was an economic and a capitalist revolution because the war happened as because of a class conflict between Yankee capitalist and southern planter aristocracy.
The Civil War was a very influential turning point in the history of the United States. The war not only strengthened the connection of the states, specifically between states in the north and south, but it also resulted in the end of the old way of life in the south, known as the old south. The way of life style in the Old South was loved by many, Rhett from Gone With the Wind being one of them. Rhett and his future wife, but current friend Scarlett were fleeing Atlanta after an attack from the north when Rhett told Scarlett that she was witnessing the end of the Old South. Rhett is truly speaking the truth in this scene.
President Lincoln stated that: “if I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it,..., and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would do it.”. This quote clearly shows that the freedom of slaves was not his concern and unnecessary if it did not help the Union; as the result, slavery still exists if there is no war. Free slave from bondage should be a Great Emancipator’s primary goal and he will do his best to achieve it no matter what, but president Lincoln’s thought differed from that because all he cares was the Union. Although he had many times admitting himself an anti-slavery but his words and thoughts obviously prove that he is
In chapter one of What They Fought For, I learned about the letters and diaries of the Confederate soldiers. The themes of the letters were home-sickness, lack of peace, and the defense of home against their invading enemy. The thought of soldiers fighting for their homes and being threatened by invaders, made them stronger when facing adversity. Many men expressed that they would rather die fighting for a cause, than dying without trying and this commitment showed patriotism. Throughout the letters, soldiers claimed their reason for fighting, was for the principles of Constitutional liberty and self-government.
The living legacy of the United States Civil War is a complicated time in American history one finds difficult to describe. The ramification of the war prior, during and after still haunt the current citizens who call The States their home. Tony Horwitz’s book Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War looks at the wide gap of discontent that still looms in the late 1990s. For some southerners, the Confederacy still lives on through reenactments, stories and beliefs. For others in the South, reminders the land was dedicated to the Confederacy spark hatred and spite.
Two fundamental questions normally surround the history of any war: whether the war was inevitable and if it was necessary. These same questions emerge any time during debates regarding the American Civil war. The most cited cause of the Civil war is the secession of certain southern states that formed the Confederate States of America in January 1861. Thomas Bonner writes "Civil War Historians and the "Needless War" Doctrine" arguing that Southern Carolina seceded in 1860, followed by six other states by January the following year. A deep analysis of the events leading to the war indicates that the Union and the Confederates had profound ideological, economic, political, and social differences.
Abraham Lincoln in the speech, The Gettysburg Address, constructs a point of achieving a "just and lasting peace" between the North and South without retribution. Lincoln supports his assertion by justifying his beliefs of unity between the states. Lincoln's purpose is to influence the people to not allow what has been done to go to waste. He wants his audience to realize that this division will only persist if no one settles the current issues in society. Lincoln speaks in a sympathizing, determined tone to address the Americans who are mourning the loss of their loved ones and to the rest of Americans who he wants to see a change from.