Why Was Julius Caesar A Bad Man
I came, I saw, I conquered!
Skylin Kinkead
Skylin Kinkead
Mrs. Samson
English 10
5 May, 2017
Essay
Was Caesar really a bad man? He had great qualities to be a leader, but the conspirators had a great reason to kill Caesar. He was also was a very bad man. He would kill all people that would disagree with him, was a terrible leader, and weak. He was a terrible leader because he was not going to go to the traditional race at the festival of Lupercal. The only reason he was not going to go is because a soothsayer told him to beware the ides of March, March fifteenth to be specific.
Julius Caesar is a man that the conspirators would consider a bad man. They would consider him a bad man because he would have done so many bad things if he were crowned at the ceremony. The conspirators make this plan so that Caesar does not get crowned. They were scared that he would become a dictator, if this were to happen he would have been a harsh and strict as a ruler. The conspirators were all ready to assassinate Caesar because they did not want the horrible dictatorship. Regardless of the personal motives, the decision was ultimately better for Rome than what it would have been with Caesar in ruling over Rome.
…show more content…
When Mark Antony was offering Caesar the crown he kept pushing it away not wanting it, he did this three different times. The people of Rome thought that this was good because they thought yes, he doesn 't want a dictatorship. Then again he was a bad man and would have been a bad ruler because he only wanted
Was Julius Caesar Justified Essay
801 Words | 4 PagesCaesar was an honorable man and was never proven to be a potentially poor leader. Rome loved him as he loved Rome. He even refused the crown when it was offered to him, to quote Casca mentioning it to Cassius and Brutus,”And he put it thrice, each time gentler than the other.” (I,ii, pg. 10). There is no substantial proof that Caesar would have been bad enough of a leader to justify a political assassination.
'Hero In Killing Caesar' By Jon Herman
442 Words | 2 PagesCaesar was a great military leader, he was a man of strength, and he conquered all of Rome. Caesar was not afraid to take charge to take Rome high and make them more powerful. If he had to Caesar would kill anyone that stood in his way of making Rome more powerful. “Kill everyone inside” “without hesitation, his men, swords drown, burst inside the bar, and soon the street was quiet.”
Why Did Julius Caesar Not Hurt Rome
682 Words | 3 PagesHistorians may argue that Julius Caesar helped rome to make it better and stronger for the people. While this might be true this is misleading because all of Julius Caesar's good actions like giving people more jobs,but it just covered up his worse actions that hurt rome. Also Julius Caesar was named a awful man throughout history from not persevering in hard situations, hurting not helping rome, and doing things for himself. To begin with Julius Caesar was named a awful man from how he didn’t persevere in hard situations. One way he didn't persevere was when Sulla (the emperor of the time) ordered Julius to divorce Cornelia (his first wife) because she was from the family of Sulla's enemies.
Comparing Power In 'Julius Caesar And Mean Girls'
993 Words | 4 PagesOftentimes, powerful people use their power to do bad things. Firstly, Julius Caesar had help before rising to power. Caesar used his forces to remove political rivals and conquer Gaul. Julius Caesar created an alliance with Crassus and Pompey to form the First Triumvirate.
Julius Caesar Research Paper
1179 Words | 5 PagesHe was a fantastic speaker and was one of the best of the time. He didn't hold grudges against most and was said to be tall and muscular (Bruson 88). His army was better than any other army in the world at the time. Although Caesar was well liked by most, he did have enemies. One of them was named Cicero.
Why Did Julius Caesar Break The Law Essay
510 Words | 3 PagesJulius Caesar was a political and military leader whose reign marked the beginning of the Roman Empire and the end of the Roman Republic. Caesar did not always follow the law to get the power that he obtained. Caesar once stated, “If you must break the law, do it to seize power; in all other cases, observe it.” If Caesar saw a way to get power, he took the opportunity even if it meant breaching the law.
Pros And Cons Of Julius Caesar
1255 Words | 6 PagesJulius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.
Julius Caesar: A Hero Or Villain?
296 Words | 2 PagesWho was Julius Caesar was he a hero or a villain? Julius Caesar was a hero to many plebeians because he made many great accomplishments of the government , Rome, and for the poor. Some people might think he was a villain, but some people think differently. First of all, Julius Caesar did many great effects to Rome. Julius gave land to the landless, like the poor and veterans who didn’t have land before.
Argumentative Essay: The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
508 Words | 3 PagesThis should not have happened to Julius Caesar after all he did for Rome and its
Theme Of Corruption In Julius Caesar
974 Words | 4 PagesCorruption is defined as dishonest or illegal behavior, especially by powerful people, and just like its definition, corruption and power go hand in hand. The more power a person has, generally, the easier it is for them to be corrupted. Just like in Julius Caesar where power and corruption are very prevalent, and most of the leaders in Julius Caesar became corrupted by their power, but in some rare cases leaders have avoided corruption, these people are very valuable in society, and must not be taken for granted. Just like many other leaders in Julius Caesar, Caesar was corrupted by his power. He wasn’t corrupt in the normal sense, he was socially corrupt in the fact that he didn’t stick to the social norms of respecting fellow senators in
Julius Caesar: Hero Or Villain
508 Words | 3 PagesJulius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.
Was Brutus Justified In Killing Caesar
350 Words | 2 PagesHe killed caesar for the better of his country and not for the better of himself. He has respect and was a honerable
Murder In Julius Caesar's Jealousy
834 Words | 4 PagesCaesar had his flaws, but he was only human. Caesar was seen as a serpent who was ready to strike and create a society that revolved around himself and would keep him at the top. On the contrary, even though the conspirators claim to have had the best intentions of Rome in their conscious and actions when assassinating Caesar, Rome still plunged itself into a civil war that disrupted the peace in the nation. Therefore, was Caesar a menace to society even though he led Rome to victory over Pompey, brought peace and created a sense of nationalism in Rome, and enforced the laws strictly in the case of Metellus Cimber in Act 3, Scene
Julius Caesar: Cassius As A Villain
724 Words | 3 PagesCaesar could also be seen as villain and had to be killed in order to keep Rome and the republic safe. He was considered a villain because he took down the republic. Even though many people disliked Caesar and his ways, many people were also fond of Caesar such as Brutus who was still apart of the conspiracy. Brutus says “I would not, Cassius, yet I love him well.” (1.2.82)
Theme Of Tyranny In Julius Caesar
607 Words | 3 PagesThe conspirators loved Caesar but they loved Rome more and feared what he would become if given the power. They wanted an emperor not a king, a friend not a tyrant. “Liberty, freedom! Tyranny is dead!” (III, I, 86).
More about Why Was Julius Caesar A Bad Man
Was Julius Caesar Justified Essay
801 Words | 4 Pages'Hero In Killing Caesar' By Jon Herman
442 Words | 2 PagesWhy Did Julius Caesar Not Hurt Rome
682 Words | 3 PagesComparing Power In 'Julius Caesar And Mean Girls'
993 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar Research Paper
1179 Words | 5 PagesWhy Did Julius Caesar Break The Law Essay
510 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons Of Julius Caesar
1255 Words | 6 PagesJulius Caesar: A Hero Or Villain?
296 Words | 2 PagesArgumentative Essay: The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
508 Words | 3 PagesTheme Of Corruption In Julius Caesar
974 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar: Hero Or Villain
508 Words | 3 PagesWas Brutus Justified In Killing Caesar
350 Words | 2 PagesMurder In Julius Caesar's Jealousy
834 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar: Cassius As A Villain
724 Words | 3 PagesTheme Of Tyranny In Julius Caesar
607 Words | 3 Pages