The United States war with Mexico continues to be a diverse topic because of the many acts that were considered logical and unforgivable. The Mexican-American War was a battle that went on from 1846 to 1848. The war was one of the first to be fought over greed and a presidential lie. Manifest Destiny, the belief of America spreading from the Atlantic Coast to the Pacific Coast, was one of the main reasons for this clash. Despite the United States war against Mexico resulted in the gaining of America’s most valuable land, the war itself was unjust because of Texans’ actions, the U.S. Government actions, and the expansion slavery. To begin with, the Texans caused the inexcusable war because of their greedy actions. For instance, in the magazine …show more content…
was needless due to the inexcusable actions made by the U.S Government. To clarify, in the Creating America textbook, page 408, the text states, “...Polk sent a rousing war message to Congress, saying, ‘Mexico has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon American soil.’ Two days later, Congress declared war… However, American had mixed reaction to Polk’s call for war. Illinois representative Abraham Lincoln questioned the truthfulness of the president’s message and the need to declare war.” To put differently, the U.S. Government’s, mostly President Polk’s, decisions were inexcusable. Many people, such as future U.S. President, Abraham Lincoln, thought the war did not have any purpose, and did not have to be declared. Another piece of evidence to support the claim is in John L. O'Sullivan Democratic Review, he wrote, “It is wholly untrue and unjust to ourselves, the pretence that the Annexation [of Texas] has been a measure of unrighteousness…” For this reason , the annexation of Texas, made by the U.S. Government, created one of the largest tensions between Mexico and America. When this happened, Mexico claimed the land of Texas to belong to them, yet the U.S. believed the land belonged to …show more content…
According to Joshua Gidding’s debate with Congress about the war with Mexico. He spoke, “... for the purposes of conquest; with the design to extend slavery; in violation of the Constitution...” The main goal of conquering the land of Texas was just to expand slavery in the United States. Before the annexation of Texas, the land was slave free, but the slave owners who resided in Texas converted the land to slavery, relating to our next piece of evidence. An also important piece of evidence to take in mind is Benjamin Lundy’s pamphlet, The War, it is written, “The immediate cause and main goal of this war… has been to grab the large and valuable territory of Texas from the Mexican Republic, in order to re-establish the SYSTEM OF SLAVERY; to open a vast and profitable SLAVE MARKET…” Certainly, as explained in this piece of evidence, the slave owners who came to colonize Texas, were not pleased of the law that there could not be any slaves in Texas. Since they were unpleasant about this rule, they decided to rebel and constantly ask the U.S. to accept them as the 28th state, so they could turn Texas into a slavestate, and own slaves once
Americans were outraged over the border dispute at the Nueces and the Rio Grande rivers, and Mexicans were irate with America’s annexation of Texas. President James K. Polk availed in the atmosphere of animosity, hurrying to place troops on conflicted land. On May 9, 1846, he found his cause for war. Mexican and American troops had engaged in combat on April 24, which led American blood spilt on contended soil. However, through all their fighting spirit, the Americans faithfully ignored their own mistreatment of the Mexicans.
The treaty increased the United State 's size by one third. “In two years the United States acquired the entire Southwest, almost one million square miles, including the present day states of California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and Colorado” (4). In exchange for land the United States promised to pay the Mexican government almost 20 million dollars and assume up to 3 million dollars in United States citizens’ land claims against Mexico. On the other hand, between the annexation of Texas and the signing of the treaty, Mexico lost 55% of its territory in 12 years. “The Treaty was the crowning achievement of an unjust war incited and waged by a stronger, richer nation against its weaker, poorer neighbor” (3).
The Mexican War was a violent and devastating event between United States and Mexico that lasted from 1846-1848. President Polk had to lie to congress, to make United States declare war on Mexico. Lincoln considered President Polk provoked as a vote-fixing device and hoped the arguments against the war would cause his reputation in the United States House of Representative. Lincoln claims President Polk misrepresented the whole thing that the Presidents Polk evidence was not true by any means. Lincoln lays out evidence that president Polk gave is either incorrect or irrelevant reasons to gain support from congress.
As a Democrat, I believe that President Polk was justified in starting the Mexican-American War. Also, as a strong supporter of Manifest Destiny, also known as Western expansion, I furthermore find reason to believe Polk was justified in initiating war with the Mexican people; being that the Mexican government refused peaceful negotiation. The Americans were the just owners of this western land, and we intended to get it. The Mexican government refused a meeting with our representative to establish the border between Texas and Mexico, along with an offer of 30 million dollars for Western territory. These western territories would provide substantial economic growth for the United States, as well as the obvious: making our nation larger as
The United States war with Mexico was over 160 years ago and still continues to be a divisive and widely debated topic, was it justifiable or not? The first war to be fought mostly on foreign land, was the Mexican-American War that started in 1846. America, lead by President Polk, who believed the U.S had a “manifest destiny”, fought against Mexico who had a weak military and was politically divided. After the war ended in 1848, Mexico lost one-third of its territory which included present-day California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico. Although the United States war against Mexico resulted in the gaining of America’s most valuable land, the war itself was unjust because their goal was to expand slavery, Texas was wrong from the beginning, and the war was based on false pretenses.
Secondly, President Polk was the president of the United States during the Mexican American war and he believed that Mexico invaded part of Texas that belong to the U.S and killed American’s on American soil. He also doesn’t feel sorry for them, Polk says, "As war exists, and notwithstanding all our efforts to avoid it, exists by the act of Mexico
borders...armed with the and the rifle, and marking its trail with schools and colleges, courts and representative halls, mills and meeting- houses” (O’Sullivan 323). Polk also somewhat wanted Texas, but the land he was really after was California. This evidence shows that if the US won Texas then Texas could help them win over California. US also keeps on saying the Mexico is not powerful and has very little authority. (O 'Sullivan 323)
Slavery is one of the top reasons as they felt like they didn’t need Mexico anymore. Throughout the time there was many battles fought against each other in many cities in Texas. Many battles were won by Mexico since their army was bigger than what Texas had at the time. The Texans felt that they could be their own state since they had all the necessities to survive their own economy and felt that with all the slave they had they could do a lot more. A lot of Texans and people from the United States wanted to help out Texas get its independence from Mexico which is what caused battles like in the Alamo.
and Mexican forces had taken place in U.S. territory.” “Further, legislators were at odds over whether Polk had the right to unilaterally declare that a state of war
In Document B, President Polk said, “I had ordered and efficient military force to take a position...to meet a threatened invasion of Texas by the Mexican forces….invasion was threatened solely because Texas had determined….to annex herself to our Union,... it was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil.” President Polk then mentioned the attack at the Rio del Norte, where the invasion in Texas happened. This evidence shows the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because Texas was invaded by Mexico, meaning that the U.S. should protect Texas by fighting
Thirdly, a second reason the Mexican War was not justified because US soldiers were in a disputed area. According to Jesus Velasco Marquez from “A Mexican Viewpoint on the War With the United States,” he states that “From Mexico’s point of view, the annexation of Texas to the United States was inadmissible for both legal and security reasons.” As well as, “The American government acted like a bandit who came upon a
The way they claimed annexed was by saying the Rio Grande was the southern boundary of Texas but Mexico said it was the Nueces River. In regards to the war, Americans were greatly divided. The northerners hated it because of the fact that Texas favored slavery. Those in the south liked the idea of a war because it would help expand to the west. This expansion would provide more land and opportunity.
As stated before, the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because of three reasons, Americans were killed, Texas was already annexed, and Manifest Destiny allows it. The United states had many superb reasons for going to war with Mexico. This essay is significant because it helps explain the United States’ choice to go to war with
Jesús Velasco-Márquez, a modern-day Mexican professor of studies wrote an article in 2006 about the Mexican-American War. He said, “US historians refer to this event as ‘The Mexican-American War’, while in Mexico, we prefer to use the term ‘The U.S. Invasion... From Mexico’s point of view, the annexation of Texas to the United States was inadmissible for both legal and security reasons. ’’’ (Velasco-Márquez, 12). During the time of the independence of Texas, Mexico was ruled by the dictator General Antonio López de Santa Anna.
Although the United States war against Mexico resulted in the gaining of America’s most valuable land, the war itself wasn’t legitimate because of the revolution in Texas, motivation for superiority, and the U.S. government’s actions. To begin, the Texans began an unreasonable war because they didn’t follow Mexico’s laws and conditions. When Mexico started selling cheap land, they set conditions for the people moving in. The people had to convert to Catholicism, learn Spanish, become a Mexican citizen, and have no slaves. Many Americans didn’t like being told what to do, and disobeyed the rules and laws.