The most compelling speech to me was “Women’s Right to Suffrage,” by Susan B. Anthony because it does a good job at using ethos logos and pathos to get the point across. She asks questions to get the audience to think. Anthony’s tone and her opinion is also really prominent in this speech as well. Susan B Anthony’s purpose was to persuade the nation to think that women should have the same rights as men. Women are just as much people as men according to the constitution because it says we the people, not we the men. The most important main idea is that she explains that the constitution says we the people showing that it is not just men who deserve the right to vote. She used allusion to the constitution. The way women are being treated is …show more content…
This shows that she has experience with this problem, she is not just coming out with her opinion without actually having any problems and expecting people to listen to her. For this main idea she is using ethos. It shows that she knows what she is talking about because she has been through it. She is not just some random person telling their opinion with no experience on the topic. First she says, “I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote.” She is explaining the reason why she is giving this speech this shows that she has credibility. Anthony goes on to say, “...I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen’s rights…” She is a citizen of the United States so she should be allowed to vote, so it should not be a crime. “Friends and Fellow CItizens,” Anthony says. This ties in with the last thing, she is a legit citizen because they allowed her to say fellow citizens. Because of the voting laws, when she tried to vote she got arrested. Clearly “Women’s Rights to the Suffrage” is the best speech. She uses a ton of rhetorical devices. First she alludes to the constitution to show that she is not crazy. Then, she uses logos to ask if women are people and concludes that they are. Finally, she uses tone and ethos to explain that it should not be a crime for women to
Women used many different methods to earn the right to vote in the Women’s Suffrage Movement. One method women used to earn support is that they organized a parade in Washington, D.C., the same day the president was coming into town so that there was large crowds. Many of the people in the crowd were men who, along with drinking also disagreed with the right for women to vote. They began to yell then even throw objects at the women walking in the parade. Eventually, the police walked away giving the men the opportunity to attack.
I speak as a woman. I speak as a United States senator. I speak as an American.” By saying this, Chase was able to use her own personal experience to show credibility and trust in her argument. Chase also uses ethos in this speech to empathize with the audience and show that she shared the same concerns as they did, and was speaking on their behalf.
Today, millions of women can implement their rights to vote in all elections in the united states of America, but this (rights) did not come easily to those women who sacrifice their lives to make this happen. In the speech “Address to Congress on Women’s Suffrage”, Catt delivered her message for women’s right from a firsthand account of what she had experienced as a woman living in the United States of America in the 19th century. She advocated for the rights of women to vote because she believes in equal rights and justice for all citizens. The speech was very successful because of the use of ethos, pathos, and logos.
She states that men and women are equal and should have the same rights and should not be treated differently than each other. This quote by Anna from the speech backs this point up, “Now I want to make this proposition, and I believe every man will accept it. Of course, he will if he is intelligent. Whenever a Republic prescribes the qualifications as applying equally to all the citizens of the Republic, when the Republic says in order to vote, a citizen must be twenty-one years of age, it applies to all alike, there is no discrimination against any race or sex”. (Shaw,4)
Good morning, today I am in the company of two of the USA’s most prominent voices against racial discrimination and segregation, Martin Luther King and Malcolm Little, known to many of you as Malcolm X. My first question: what gave you the willpower to fight against something so openly as opposed to many who simply accepted it. MLK: Since I was a child, I’ve experienced segregation and it just never seemed right that people are discriminated against due to the colour of their skin. Action needs to be taken so that everyone is truly equal and as I said in my speech, hopefully one day in the future those of different ethnicities will be able to live together without the problem of segregation. M.X:
To urge the arrogant politicians to pass the women’s suffrage amendment to the Constitution, Chapman Catt not only induces fear and culpability in them, but the language she employs also establishes herself as a credible individual by aligning with respected figures and emulating the politicians’ style of speech. Chapman Catt establishes herself as a credible individual by aligning with respected figures. Premising from the beginning of her address, she alludes to the cause of the American revolution, and the government’s power coming “from the consent” of the people as the two “fundamental principles” that “anchor” the liberty of the United States (39-40). This aligns her with the American ideals that founded the country. Building on that premise, she continues by
She does a great job of explaining her point to her audience by repeating her main point over and over again. However, this speech was given twenty years ago, nothing was changed. At the time when Clinton gave her speech, it may not have been appreciated that much by the society. However, she mentioned this speech again in 2008, and this time, many more people came to know the reality of how women are being treated in other countries. Her speech was also considered influential in women’s rights movement.
This obviously shows she is on the side of women's rights in her argument and again, quoting the Declaration of Independence, gives her the quality of formality using lines from a piece that dear to American
People remember this has a great speech because what she represents in this speech is hope, gratefulness, and guidance. Also the rhetorical devices she uses makes the speech that much more personal. Her use of an apostrophe or using an imaginary person was a great addition to the speech. She stats “ where after all do universal human rights begin? In a small places, close to home, so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world of the individual person; the individual person; the neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he attends”(adoption).
Clinton attempts to use propaganda, empathy, and logic to present her point, that women to her audience, and succeeds at it. Overall, the speech is balanced in its argument style and use of rhetoric, such as the factors mentioned above. At this point, Clinton was not a New York senator yet, but only First Lady, yet she used her position to go to conferences, such as this conference, and speak out for women’s rights, as they are the same as human
For example Anthony says, “but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household” This is very sad since women and girls should not be ruled or told what to do because they are thought of to be less than man. The constitution is in place to have a unified country not to have an oligarchy of men lead households. The pathos appeal is used to show what suffering women are going through due to men ruling them, and not knowing how to fight back. Susan B. Anthony in her speech also says, “Are women persons?.....and no state has the right to make a law, or to enforce an old law, that shall abridge their privileges and immunities.”, which also connects with the emotions of the audience. She is trying to make people feel bad that women are treated less even though they are just as righteous as men to have the same privileges.
Another persuasive technique that made her speech impactful is the presence of antithesis. “Diversity is not just tolerated, but is embraced” (Commencement Address to the Wellesley College Class of 1990). Bush draws special attention to this idea of diversity and how students at the college go above and beyond to exemplify what sets their university apart by comparing them to the rest of the world in this opposition of ideas. The final reason her speech is considered persuasive is through her use of metaphor. “And so you need not, and probably cannot, live a ‘paint-by-numbers’ life” (Commencement Address to the Wellesley College Class of 1990).
In my opinion, the speech given by Frederick Douglass is more effective. One of the reasons is that he uses question and exclamation marks throughout his speech in a very interesting way. In the first two paragraphs of Mr. Douglass' speech, he introduces his points through questions. By the time the audience knows what the speech is about, they will also be reflecting about the topic, so this question marks have a dual function. Then, when Douglass wants to emphasize certain idea, he finishes it with a exclamation mark.
In her speech she continues to say, “And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republic government -- the ballot.” (Anthony,1)
Thesis Proposal Title The impact women’s right to vote had on economic growth in the U.S, as women in integrated into the labour force from the 1920’s to the 1990’s. Background Prior to the 1920s, before women got their right to vote in America. They took up in the more subservient role in society, they were not seen as equal to the men.