Generative AI in Higher Education: Potential and Outlook

The recent chatter surrounding generative AI and the increased usage of artificial intelligence by students has also extended into the realms of higher education, with academicians especially concerned about AI’s impact on essay and research paper writing. Considering that generative AI has the potential to produce new content, its reach in higher education is bound to grow over time. While generative AI is already capable of aiding students in some niches of their education, the overall advancement of this technology is bound to find greater degrees of implementation in the future. The promoters of generative AI often point out the numerous advantages of AI and integrating these technologies with higher educational curricula; however, caution needs to be exercised to ensure that negative influences do not creep in. The subsequent portions of this article explore the effects generative AI will have on higher education and how the use of these tools needs to be approached with prudence to ensure academic credibility is maintained.

What is Generative AI?

Generative AI shows incredible capabilities when it comes to understanding language-based prompts.
Image Credit: Levart_Photographer on Unsplash

Generative AI is a form of artificial intelligence powered by machine learning algorithms capable of creating original content such as text, images, graphics, and even videos. While generative AI’s primary purpose might not be to perform these tasks, they can be augmented to carry them out to higher degrees of perfection by extending their database and enhancing the duration of learning. Structured and based on language models, generative AI often runs various processes that discover the statistical links between words and understand the numerous combinations they can be used in. Despite presenting only a mechanical understanding of language, generative AI tools can produce original content that seems almost indistinguishable from works created by human beings. This has turned into a concern among educators especially following the arrival of ChatGPT and its rampant use by students.

Generative AI in Higher Education

Higher education might witness extensive changes with the integration of AI systems.
Image Credit: MD Duran on Unsplash

As far as higher education goes, generative AI has the potential to transform the methods of both teaching and learning if integrated into the current university curriculum. Despite being in its nascent stages, it must be noted that various AI tools already exist in educational spaces, whether it is to help detect plagiarism, manage administrative tasks, assist in the generation of new educational material, or even to detect content generated by AI. Generative AI tools also provide scope for their implementation in student assessment and in supporting teaching staff with these core tasks. As AI tools provide better scope for individual analyses and assessments of students, teachers might be able to free up more time, helping them prioritize the structuring of learning material and courses better for their students. Tools derived from generative AI might also point at insights that allow instructors to help their students better their abilities in core tasks.  

Despite the rosy picture painted by the benefits of AI, it also comes with numerous caveats capable of forcing a rethink when it comes to the implementation of these tools in higher education. With the possibility of automation often looming around the inclusion of AI, generative AI can automate many tasks that are carried out by auxiliary teaching staff, assistants, and support personnel. The economic impact of integrating AI in higher education requires dedicated assessment and analysis apart from the ongoing scrutiny concerning the academic impact and student usage of machine learning tools. Caution also needs to be exercised when it comes to unsupervised and rampant usage of generative AI, as these tools cannot often quote sources for the information they provide. Tools such as ChatGPT are also prone to provide outdated information that does not adjust for new data and take into consideration information only until the end of the year 2021. Given that machine learning usually relies on datasets for training the algorithm, a limited dataset can result in an AI tool that responds with limited information prone to bias and inaccuracies. This becomes a serious problem for students in higher education, where relevance, specificity, and accuracy are of great importance. AI-generated academic papers, while seemingly authentic, risk lowering the overall standard of academic content and performance, while also posing a potential threat to the structure of carrying out and reporting on research.

Managing AI in Higher Education

Monitoring AI integration in higher education will be key to holistic learning in the future university.
Image Credit: luis_gomes on Pexels

The influx of AI systems also presents the challenge of managing these technologies in a higher education context. The numerous considerations to be made, alongside the drawbacks of these technologies, will necessitate a balanced approach capable of utilizing the benefits while offsetting the disadvantages. As electronic systems are integrated into the core of higher education, data management will become a quintessential component of operating these systems in the educational sphere. Privacy and identity protection are crucial to safeguard both student and staff interests alongside confidentiality. The collection and utilization of data must strictly occur only under protected channels with access only to those authorized. Regulations on AI must be deployed in institutional settings to ensure ethical policies are enforced strictly on the usage of such tools. Staff training and orientation to allow professors and auxiliary teaching staff to learn and understand generative AI applications will also help in reigning in the potential disadvantages and misuse of these technologies. 

Consideration of technical, practical, socioeconomic, and ethical concerns must be factored into the decisions which surround AI implementation in higher education. A culture of transparency, collaboration, and seamless feedback is key to weeding out the negative effects of AI on learning outcomes. Care must also be taken in managing systems to prioritize the human element in education. Mechanizing the system will make it difficult for students to have a holistic experience. Though large-scale AI integration into higher education curricula is still a few ways down the road, planning and preparation cannot be ignored, with the drafting of policies and the setting up of pilot studies being the first steps to make way for a smooth transition.