nor was he immoral or cutthroat. On a superficial level, The Prince is a manual for tyrants; on a deeper level its Machiavelli's call to the leaders of Italy to bring order and unification. And even more so, its a warning to the people of Italy about the power of governments. If read straightforward The Prince is manual for ambitious men on how to become a tyrant, however, if one takes the context in which it was written, The Prince reads very different. Machiavelli was a long time diplomat, having

The Prince is a world famous political treatise written by the renowned Italian diplomat Niccolò Machiavelli who also is considered one of the earliest representatives of the political philosophy. The book presents thorough considerations about the role of the prince in the life of his country and about the ways to keep the authority. The book allows the readers to build an image of an ideal ruler who reflects the most essential features of the character that Machiavelli believed to be necessary

Some of the lessons to rulers found in “The Prince” most famously, the shield of heartlessness towards subjects has led to the judgement that Machiavelli book is evil or not moral. Moreover, the direct split of politics from ethics and attitude seems to pinpoint that there is no role for any kind of charity in Machiavelli’s state. However, Machiavelli’s never promotes heartlessness or other vices for their own well being. He promotes them only in the interests of protecting the state, which, in

Despite their different opinions on the role fear should play in preserving a political order Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes both assert that fear is an important element of functional societies. Machiavelli’s The Prince primarily focuses on preserving and expanding a ruler’s position, while Hobbes’s Leviathan primary focus is on constructing an ideal commonwealth to escape the “state of nature”. Machiavelli believes that a ruler should use fear as a tool to maintain his position of power

to achieve that end. When confronted with this insurmountable task, it seems rather unreasonable that western intellectuals have thoroughly stigmatized Machiavellian thought in all its incarnations. Despite the fact that the ideas outlined in The Prince and Machiavelli’s various other works merely establish a practical set of conduct which enables the achievement of those ends.

The Prince was a scandalous political theory book written in 1513 by Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian diplomat and political logician. The Prince disregarded political norms of having well rounded and moral leaders, replacing those figures was the idea of a ruthless prince, not limited by morality or religion. Niccolò Machiavelli was born in 1469 in Florence, in 1498 he was appointed secretary and second chancellor to the Florentine Republic. Machiavelli’s most well-known work was The Prince and one

Machiavelli’s arguments in his work The Prince, surrounding ruling and the concept of dirty hands, were utilised in Michael Walzer’s political piece titled, Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands. Walzer uses Machiavelli’s commentary to advance many of his central points. Throughout his comprehensive article, Walzer effectively utilizes Machiavelli’s arguments that consistently stays true those in The Prince and provides a persuasive reading. In order to understand Walzer’s commentary, it

his “infamous” work of literature, The Prince. However, the book was popular posthumously. The Prince was created as a gift to appease Lorenzo Medici. Because Machiavelli had conspired against the powerful Florentine Lorenzo Medici. In consequence, Medici forced exile upon Machiavelli. The prince was successfully delivered to Medici. Ironically, Medici had not taken a glance over Machiavelli’s masterpiece; until it discovered by someone years later. The prince is no ordinary book that consists: exposition