ipl-logo

12 Angry Men Essay

1324 Words6 Pages

Social injustices along with prejudice, discrimination, stereotyping, and aggression manifest themselves in almost all groups around the globe. The injustices are often very complex in places inhabited by multiethnic and multiracial groups. even though, racial prejudice and discrimination have been in large part minimized, there nonetheless exist some social injustices based on different factors which include gender, age, ethnicity, and nationality amongst different divisive lines. regularly these incidents can be defined as the usage of social psychology theories. Reginald Rose’s 1957 movie Twelve Angry men perfectly captures issues about prejudice, discrimination, stereotyping, and aggression through the eyes of a jury, in a homicide trial. …show more content…

Juror 3 angrily accuses the other judges that they've "hearts bleedin' all over the ground approximately slum kids and injustice" (Rose, 1957). He warns them angrily that “ we are letting him slip thru our fingers" (Rose, 1957). there may be also adequate proof of stereotyping. Juror 3 states “It’s the manner kids are nowadays” (Rose, 1957). In this example, he passes blanket condemnation and stereotypes younger humans whom he deems to be disrespectful and unruly. The reason for his stereotyping is his estranged son who angers him continuously causing him to have the view that all younger people are …show more content…

The film is likewise rife with mental theories to explain conformity. The electricity of normative and informational social impacts is shown through theories evolved via Solomon Asch and Muzafer Sherif. in line with informational social impact, people conform due to the fact they believe that the interpretations of other human beings about a seemingly ambiguous situation are greater legitimate as compared to their own. Normative conformity asserts that people conform so that they're now not seen as being defiant. In this case, juror eight makes use of calculative moves and reasoning to persuade the selections of juror 9 that the younger man is now not responsible. Juror 9 in flip affects the selections of several different jurors. Juror three tries to claim that the young guy turned ugly. before the vote is taken he tries to influence the choices of the opposite judges by pointing out, “of the path he's guilty” (Rose, 1957). some other juror states, “there’s usually needs to be one” about there being unruly men among minorities in the slums. those two men try and use the strength of normative social impact to persuade the others to bypass a “responsible”

Open Document