ipl-logo

12 Angry Men Essay

526 Words3 Pages

12 Angry Men is a Fictional Film about a Murder Trial and 12 Jurors who argue and yap at each other for an hour and thirty five minutes. 12 Angry Men is a film about a murder trial with 12 jurors deciding whether or not a young boy is guilty of murdering his father. The film starts out calm and collective with the Jurors reviewing evidence for their decision, but as the film goes on, tensions rise due to many factors. The jurors, even at first, disagreed with each other, which caused arguments over the evidence. The weather was very hot and also made everyone on edge because they had to sit in a hot room together arguing. As the film went on, the jurors disputed certain things like what the boy yelled out during the supposed killing. One of the witnesses claimed they could hear the boy yell out “I’m gonna kill you”, and it was proven that there was a train passing by as the killing took place. So the Jurors came to the conclusion that there would be no way the witness could have heard him say that before the killing. …show more content…

The jurors came to the conclusion that since the witness wore glasses and that people who wear glasses, don’t usually wear them while going to sleep, the testimony could not prove the boy was guilty. Eventually the jurors came to the topic of the murder weapon. One Juror claimed that since the weapon used in the killing was a switchblade, the stab listed in the killing was false, since you don’t use a switchblade to stab overhead, because of the way the blade comes out of the

Show More
Related
727 Words | 3 Pages

Furthermore, when juror 4 points out that the kid bought the knife, took it home and killed his father then wiped off the fingerprints as he notes in act 1, “The boy took the knife home and a few hours later stabbed his father with it and even remembered to wipe off the fingerprints.” , Also in act 3 Juror 5 notes that because this was premeditated murder and the kid is a skilled knife fighter he would have stabbed downward with a switch knife as he notes in page 40 of act 3 “Anyone who's ever used a switch knife would never have stabbed downward. You don't handle a switch knife that way. You use it underhanded.” These two pieces of evidence raise reasonable doubt because if it was premeditated murder and the kid was a skilled knife fighter, he would have never stabbed his father the wrong way, he would have used the switchblade and stabbed the way a “skilled knife fighter” would stab.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Which brings back to eights argument that the boy may have said ot out of anger, but not meaning it literally. In the next scene three and the rest of the jurors decide to reenact the murder with the knife. But three messes it up when he uses the wrong technique and so four takes over, but something always seemed to be wrong with the demonstration. Someone did not always agree. Eight refers to the old mans testimony how the hesaid it was only 15 seconds before he got to his door so now they believe he is a liar and his testimony is not valid with the case.

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

He wanted to give this boy a fair chance without even knowing him. Juror 8 gives some very valid points which lead me to believe that the boy is not guilty; some of those points being: first, the old man in the apartment would not have made it to the door in time and he couldn’t have heard it, and second, the lady across the street wouldn’t have had her glasses on and she saw the murder through 2 moving train cars. Juror 8 is the one to bring up the issue of the man not being able to make it to the door. “He had to get up out of bed, got his canes, walk twelve feet, open the bedroom door, walk forty-three feet and open the front door-all in fifteen seconds.

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

The ruling out of these major pieces of evidence makes an argument for the boy’s guilt extremely difficult, but some would use the point of the old man and how he saw the boy go down the hallway after murdering his father to try and make an argument. The jurors prove that this could have happened by simulating the time of the murder and how fast the old man could have got to the door. Juror 12 states, “So now both time sequences check--the one you did and the one we did; what with running downstairs and everything, it does pretty much check out on time” (Rose

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Juror number 12 was so worried about missing the baseball game that he got tickets for he was just agreeing with everyone else and not really putting in his actual opinion. When the discussion started to come to a close juror number 12 switched from saying the boy was guilty to not guilty. When asked why he didn’t think he the boy was guilty he couldn’t give an answer. He was so messed up with his priorities that it started to rain, and he knew the game was canceled but was still worried about missing it. When asked why he thought the boy was guilty juror number 5 passed to talk about why he thought that way.

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

12 Angry Men is a play written by Reginald Rose. The play tells of a sixteen year old boy that was tried for premeditated first degree manslaughter and the twelve men on the jury who discussed the verdict. The unanimous decision ultimately would decide the boy’s fate of life or death. The twelve jurors all had very different and important parts in the discussion of the ruling. Rose incorporated dialogue between Juror 10 and the other jurors to contribute to the idea of prejudice obscuring the truth.

Read More
1434 Words | 6 Pages

The warmth in the Juror room reflects the strain in the level headed discussion. The blade that demonstrates the young fellow 's blame soon speaks to the sensible uncertainty for the legal hearers. The blade is a standout amongst the most convincing bits of confirmation that executive conveys to our consideration, yet it 's the presentation of the second blade by legal Juror number 8 that breaks the "Blameworthy" party 's contention to shambles. The switchblade blade appears to speak to the hard life confronted by the "ghetto inhabitants" and numerous, particularly Juror number 10, expect that those "ghetto occupants" have a more prominent capability of being culprits, which thus makes it less demanding for him to naturally vote liable without thought. The votes of the Jurors are a normal image of the vote based procedures of the United States at first glance.

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

In 12 Angry Men, the movie begins in a courtroom where the case is being discussed by the judge, who seems fairly uninterested. The jurors are then instructed to enter the jury room to begin their deliberations. They take a vote and all but juror 8 vote guilty. The jurors react violently to the dissenting vote but ultimately decide to go around the table in hope of convincing the 8th juror.

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

The film, "12 Angry Men" tells the story of a twelve-man jury discussing the fate of an alleged murderer who happens to be a young man. It is widely regarded as one of the greatest courtroom dramas ever made, directed by Sidney Lumet and released in 1957. This film dives into the topics of justice, prejudice, and the power of persuasion. In a crowded and hot jury room, the story takes place on a rainy ordinary afternoon.

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

One piece of evidence that proves the boy’s innocence is the uncommon kind of knife. The testimony said that it was one of a kind knife, while juror number eight brought the exact same one in a local pawn shop proving that the knife wasn’t that rare. In addition to the not uncommon knife, we also have

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

I would defiantly recommend this movie to friends and family’s because it really engages the audience and opens your mind about law and bias. (2.) I believe that the movie is trying to tell us that the person who killed the victim isn 't actually relevant, which is the way it should be in all murder trials, the only relevant idea is whether the story that the prosecution presents to the jury convinces them beyond reasonable doubt that the boy is guilty. Clearly it does at the start of the film

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

8: I think that… as a juror… we have to really think, we have to think about all the evidence, about all the outcomes. Well if I voted guilty at the initial vote, we would’ve let the boy die but as a juror being given jury duty… one of the highest duties of citizenship… is a big duty and being trusted and chosen to have a person’s life in your hands is just way too much pressure to handle and is one of the hardest things to do in your own lifetime and a one of a lifetime experience that you will just never forget. I would say that a case like this takes so much time and needs to have a proper moral to end up with the right

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

he story of the movie ’12 Angry Men’ is grounded on the trail of eighteen years old boy who was accused of killing his abusive father stabbing to death. Twelve jury have been chosen to decide the fate of the boy. If the jury finds him guilty then he will be sentenced to death, it was a grave responsibility for them since it was a matter of life and death. The face of the convict was shown for the first and last time while the jury was retiring from the room, it was a gloomy face whose life is at the hands of the decision of the jury. As the jury entered into the jury room, the air inside the room was hot, which can also be symbolic to the intensity of the case.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

12 Angry Men, although produced in the late fifties still offers a great slate for any viewer. The special effects and quality can easily be guessed by the black and white silhouettes of the film. The intensifying conflict of this film easily overshadows the lacking up to date criteria expected from a film. Many viewers expect a well-developed plot and characters with an accompanying use of special effects and coherent scenes. This courthouse drama has assigned twelve men to juror duty which will make this murder case mystifying by involving the viewers in the underlying theme of prejudice in the film.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

The movie “Twelve Angry Men” illustrates lots of social psychology theories. This stretched and attractive film, characterize a group of jurors who have to decide the innocence or guiltiness of an accused murder. They are simply deliberating the destiny of a Puerto Rican teenaged boy accused of murdering his father. Initially, as the film begins, except the juror Davis (Henry Fonda), all other jurors vote guilty. Progressively, the jurors begin trying to compromise on a point that everybody agree because the decision of the jury has to be unanimous.

Read More

More about 12 Angry Men Essay

Open Document