ipl-logo

12 Angry Men Essay

1029 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: 12 angry men movie psychology analysis

Name: Shweta Chakraborty Date: Wednesday, June 7th, 2023 Unit 5: Final Assessment Class: #703
Twelve Angry Men Vocabulary Study
Reginald Rose’s drama, Twelve Angry Men is a novel that illustrates the biases, empathy, logical reasoning, and prejudices that still occur in the courtroom during a trial today. The classic book discusses discrimination and the use of logic and compassion in the American justice system to determine a verdict.
Twelve Angry Men depicts a jury of eleven jurors and a foreman who took an oath to determine the defendant's verdict and vowed to put aside their prejudices while doing so. The jury is supposed to cast their ballots after deliberating whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. Moreover, …show more content…

The jury starts the trial by figuring out the boy's motive for trying to kill his father in the first place. The jury casts the first vote, and eleven jurors find the boy guilty of murder. However, the eighth juror doubts the evidence and votes the boy is not guilty of homicide, triggering a new discussion among the jurors about the old man's testimony. Even though the elderly man had sworn to tell the truth, it was later discovered that he had lied when the jury asked how, given his age and condition, he could have run to the stairs in under fifteen seconds. They discovered it would have taken at least forty-two seconds for the elderly man to run from his bedroom to the stairs after Juror 8 acted it out. Because of this revelation, some of the jurors who initially believed the defendant was guilty changed their vote to not guilty, as they began to doubt the other evidence and question the other …show more content…

While she was about to go to bed, the woman claimed she saw the boy murder his father with a knife. But, as stated by Juror 8, she would not have been able to see the boy stabbing his father because she wears glasses, and the only thing she could have seen was a blur of the father being murdered. This final analysis resulted in a vote of eleven to one in favor of guilty. In the end, all of the jurors agreed unanimously that the boy was not guilty because all of their discussion points towards the boy not being guilty. The jury members prepare to return to the courtroom and acquit the boy as they leave the jury

Show More
Related
659 Words | 3 Pages

Juror number 8 argues that the case should be further deliberated considering a young boys’ life is at stake. Some of the jurors believe that the constant abuse the boy received from his father caused him to kill him. At this point most of the jurors were getting irritated so juror number 8 requested another vote be taken, which we would not participate in. If the 11 jurors all voted guilty then juror number 8 would also change his vote too guilty, but if another juror votes not guilty the 12 men will stay and discuss the case further. Juror number 9 wanted to hear

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Juror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the old man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the old man “[ran ] to his door and [saw ] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the old man could not have done that because of his stroke.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

The “facts” that were given from the witnesses immediately persuaded the eleven jurors that the defendant was guilty. The

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

Juror nine realizes that juror eight has just been trying to protect the kid's life not knowing for sure if he is guilty or not. Juror nine says, “Thank you. This gentleman has been standing alone against us. He doesn’t say the boy is not guilty. He just isn’t sure.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

The movie begins in the humid jury room by taking a vote to see whether or not the boy is guilty: eleven guilties and one not guilty. At this point Mr. Davis (the only not guilty vote) could have easily switched his vote and sentenced the boy to death, however he did not. This is where some men get aggravated. This film shows the many ways the men try to persuade one another to change their vote through the characters of Mr. Davis (Juror 8), Juror 4, and Mr. McCardle (Juror 9).

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

Though juror 3 has been adamant on the guilt of the young boy it is safe to say that this case meant more to him because the relationship with his son is similar to the relationship between the boy and the father. Since his personal vendetta causes him to forcefully accuse the boy of murder it leaves the jury 11-1 in favor of not guilty. Since carefully reviewing the movie it becomes very prevalent that there has not been enough substantial evidence to convict the boy of murder. Furthermore, with the usage of group think all of the men, accept juror 3 are able to put their pride aside and vote what they truly believe the verdict should be, which is not guilty. Though, one of the more pragmatic points in the film happens after juror 3 becomes infuriated after realizing that all of the men are voting not guilty.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

Reginald Rose’s ‘12 Angry Men’ is a play set in New York that focuses on prejudice and the injustice of the American jury system. The idea that “truth can be concealed by prejudice” is encapsulated by the biases of jurors 10 and 4, however, this notion is not the only way truth is concealed, as shown by both jurors 3 and 7. Rose undoubtedly emphasises the idea of prejudice concealing the truth through Juror 10. Throughout the deliberation process, he vehemently expresses his prejudiced beliefs against the defendant because he is “one of them”, encapsulating his entrenched racism as he dehumanises the defendant because of his background.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

Twelve Angry Men, fischersoph. files. The file is a file. Wordpress.com/2010/09/12-angry-men-script.pdf. Accessed on April 24, 2019. Accessed 12 Apr. 2024 Twelve Angry Men is a play by Reginald Rose that follows the deliberation of a homicide case by twelve jurors, each with their own biases.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

This man may be a bit timid in part due to his old age, but his quiet nature also makes him insightful, noticing very specific details about witnesses that many others on the jury missed. He seems to come off as the most respectable and well mannered man out of the twelve. He 's the first to change his vote to not guilty, mostly to give Juror 8 a chance to make his case and out of respect for his motives in gambling for support. In talking about the older man that gave testimony it 's almost as though he 's talking about himself, revealing that he wants to be useful and to do something valuable, even if it 's just this once as a juror. As you may have noticed out of all the twelve men in the movie, each and everyone of them has unique personalities, that all at one point throughout the trial, played a very effective role in deciding this boy 's fate.

Read More
391 Words | 2 Pages

Certain jurors can be easily swayed. A good example of this is juror 2 promptly adopting the opinions of the other jurors without much reason. “Oh. Well… I just think he’s guilty. I thought it was obvious.

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

We have the coincidence that the man was murdered just when the train was passing. Due to the proximity of the house and the noise the train emits the old man could not hear anyone scream. The man also argues that fifteen seconds after hearing those words and watching the father's body fall he watched the young man running down the hall. With the help of the building's plans the jury number eight showed that it was impossible for the man to see the young man running down the hallway only 15 seconds after hearing the scream according to the distance between him and the hall.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

‘Twelve Angry Men’ written by Reginald Rose, is based on the story of a jury who have to come together to determine the fate of a young boy accused to have murdered his own father. Initially, eleven of the jurors vote not guilty with one of the juror being uncertain of the evidence put before them. As the men argue over the different pieces of evidence, the insanity begins to make sense and the decision becomes clearer as they vote several other times. Rose creates drama and tension in the jury room, clearly exploring through the many issues of prejudice, integrity and compassion, in gaining true justice towards the accused victim. These aspects have been revealed through three character who are Juror 10, Juror 8 and Juror 3.

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

Juror eight held his ground and convince the men to look over all of the evidence. Juror eight brought out the files, acted out different situations and the murder scene. The men went back and forth for hours fighting about whether or not the boy was guilt of killing his father Slowly one by one the jurors changed their mind from guilty to not guilty. All but juror three changed their mind, he was the last one standing so the vote was 11-1.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

The movie “Twelve Angry Men” illustrates lots of social psychology theories. This stretched and attractive film, characterize a group of jurors who have to decide the innocence or guiltiness of an accused murder. They are simply deliberating the destiny of a Puerto Rican teenaged boy accused of murdering his father. Initially, as the film begins, except the juror Davis (Henry Fonda), all other jurors vote guilty. Progressively, the jurors begin trying to compromise on a point that everybody agree because the decision of the jury has to be unanimous.

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

In a New York City, an 18-year-old male from a slum is on a trial claiming that he is responsible for his father death by stabbing him After both sides has finished their closing argument in the trial, the judge asks the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty or not The judge informs the jury decided the boy is guilty, he will face a death sentence as a result of this trial The jurors went into the private room to discuss about this case. At the first vote, all jurors vote guilty apart from Juror 8 (Henry Fonda), he was the only one who voted “Note Guilty” Juror 8 told other jurors that they should discuss about this case before they put a boy into a death sentence

Read More

More about 12 Angry Men Essay

Related Topics

Open Document