ipl-logo

12 Angry Men Essay

1029 Words5 Pages

Name: Shweta Chakraborty Date: Wednesday, June 7th, 2023 Unit 5: Final Assessment Class: #703
Twelve Angry Men Vocabulary Study
Reginald Rose’s drama, Twelve Angry Men is a novel that illustrates the biases, empathy, logical reasoning, and prejudices that still occur in the courtroom during a trial today. The classic book discusses discrimination and the use of logic and compassion in the American justice system to determine a verdict.
Twelve Angry Men depicts a jury of eleven jurors and a foreman who took an oath to determine the defendant's verdict and vowed to put aside their prejudices while doing so. The jury is supposed to cast their ballots after deliberating whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. Moreover, …show more content…

The jury starts the trial by figuring out the boy's motive for trying to kill his father in the first place. The jury casts the first vote, and eleven jurors find the boy guilty of murder. However, the eighth juror doubts the evidence and votes the boy is not guilty of homicide, triggering a new discussion among the jurors about the old man's testimony. Even though the elderly man had sworn to tell the truth, it was later discovered that he had lied when the jury asked how, given his age and condition, he could have run to the stairs in under fifteen seconds. They discovered it would have taken at least forty-two seconds for the elderly man to run from his bedroom to the stairs after Juror 8 acted it out. Because of this revelation, some of the jurors who initially believed the defendant was guilty changed their vote to not guilty, as they began to doubt the other evidence and question the other …show more content…

While she was about to go to bed, the woman claimed she saw the boy murder his father with a knife. But, as stated by Juror 8, she would not have been able to see the boy stabbing his father because she wears glasses, and the only thing she could have seen was a blur of the father being murdered. This final analysis resulted in a vote of eleven to one in favor of guilty. In the end, all of the jurors agreed unanimously that the boy was not guilty because all of their discussion points towards the boy not being guilty. The jury members prepare to return to the courtroom and acquit the boy as they leave the jury

Show More
Related

What Does Juror Number 8 Mean

659 Words | 3 Pages

Since the man had a limp some of jurors come to the conclusion that the elderly man could have not made to the window in time to see the boy running. Jurors 5 and 11 change their vote to not guilty. After another vote is taken two more jurors change their vote to not guilty. With a total of 6 guilty and 6 not

Read More

Ethos Pathos In 12 Angry Men

997 Words | 4 Pages

Juror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the old man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the old man “[ran ] to his door and [saw ] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the old man could not have done that because of his stroke.

Read More

Not Guilty In 12 Angry Men, By Reginald Rose

394 Words | 2 Pages

As the jury was discussing the old man’s testimony, Juror 9, who is also an old man, thinks that he was lying in the testimony. This makes everyone

Read More

Not Guilty In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

576 Words | 3 Pages

The “facts” that were given from the witnesses immediately persuaded the eleven jurors that the defendant was guilty. The

Read More

12 Angry Men Assessment: 12 Angry Men

755 Words | 4 Pages

Daja McLaurin Benton TA: Yiwen Dai Communications: 250 1 April, 2016 12 Angry Men Assessment After viewing the movie 12 Angry Men the group was able to implement the ideas of group think immediately during the start of the movie. Since the men briefly established a relationship from the time of witnessing the trial to start of deliberation n the empty room and reaching a unanimous decision, they found that all of the men initially achieved a verdict of guilty accept for juror 8. After this surprising decision the men began to show their true colors and distinguish how one may believe something and another juror may believe another. The group takes time in pleading individual opinions while deciding on the guilt or innocence of a young boy

Read More

Prejudice In Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men

701 Words | 3 Pages

Reginald Rose’s ‘12 Angry Men’ is a play set in New York that focuses on prejudice and the injustice of the American jury system. The idea that “truth can be concealed by prejudice” is encapsulated by the biases of jurors 10 and 4, however, this notion is not the only way truth is concealed, as shown by both jurors 3 and 7. Rose undoubtedly emphasises the idea of prejudice concealing the truth through Juror 10. Throughout the deliberation process, he vehemently expresses his prejudiced beliefs against the defendant because he is “one of them”, encapsulating his entrenched racism as he dehumanises the defendant because of his background.

Read More

Annotated Bibliography: Twelve Angry Men

705 Words | 3 Pages

Twelve Angry Men, fischersoph. files. The file is a file. Wordpress.com/2010/09/12-angry-men-script.pdf. Accessed on April 24, 2019. Accessed 12 Apr. 2024 Twelve Angry Men is a play by Reginald Rose that follows the deliberation of a homicide case by twelve jurors, each with their own biases.

Read More

12 Angry Men Chapter 7

695 Words | 3 Pages

It is about getting everyone to agree on the same goal and make sure no one feels unsure about their decision. Juror number eight was the first one to vote not guilty. Juror number 9 was the next person to vote not guilty, he said the reason he changed his vote was because he wanted to hear juror number eights point of view on why he thought that way. After they had went over all the facts all the jurors started to change their minds. According to filmsite, the order in which the jurors changed their votes were, juror 8, 9, 5, 11, 2, 6, 7, 12, 1, jurors 4 and 10 changed their minds at the same time, and juror number 3 was the last one to vote not guilty.

Read More

Evidence In 12 Angry Men

488 Words | 2 Pages

We have the coincidence that the man was murdered just when the train was passing. Due to the proximity of the house and the noise the train emits the old man could not hear anyone scream. The man also argues that fifteen seconds after hearing those words and watching the father's body fall he watched the young man running down the hall. With the help of the building's plans the jury number eight showed that it was impossible for the man to see the young man running down the hallway only 15 seconds after hearing the scream according to the distance between him and the hall.

Read More

12 Angry Men Jury Duty Essay

794 Words | 4 Pages

Jury duty is often seen as an option people are seeking to avoid at times. However, jury duty should not be seen as a negative, but rather jury duty should be seen as a chance for a civilian to do their part in contributing to justice. Twelve Angry Men is mainly about twelve men coming together to discuss and argue whether a young man should be put on the death penalty, the play continuously makes it a point to make the jurors have a hard time deciding a final verdict. Jurors argued their side of what occurred with the defendant and the victim, some would change their answers or few would make a point of trying to convince the other jurors why the defendant is guilty. As the act progresses, the jurors finally realize one important detail of

Read More

What Is 12 Angry Men Flawed

391 Words | 2 Pages

Certain jurors can be easily swayed. A good example of this is juror 2 promptly adopting the opinions of the other jurors without much reason. “Oh. Well… I just think he’s guilty. I thought it was obvious.

Read More

12 Angry Men Analysis

814 Words | 4 Pages

‘Twelve Angry Men’ written by Reginald Rose, is based on the story of a jury who have to come together to determine the fate of a young boy accused to have murdered his own father. Initially, eleven of the jurors vote not guilty with one of the juror being uncertain of the evidence put before them. As the men argue over the different pieces of evidence, the insanity begins to make sense and the decision becomes clearer as they vote several other times. Rose creates drama and tension in the jury room, clearly exploring through the many issues of prejudice, integrity and compassion, in gaining true justice towards the accused victim. These aspects have been revealed through three character who are Juror 10, Juror 8 and Juror 3.

Read More

12 Angry Men Murder Scene Analysis

851 Words | 4 Pages

Juror eight held his ground and convince the men to look over all of the evidence. Juror eight brought out the files, acted out different situations and the murder scene. The men went back and forth for hours fighting about whether or not the boy was guilt of killing his father Slowly one by one the jurors changed their mind from guilty to not guilty. All but juror three changed their mind, he was the last one standing so the vote was 11-1.

Read More

Social Psychology In The Movie Twelve Angry Men

721 Words | 3 Pages

The movie “Twelve Angry Men” illustrates lots of social psychology theories. This stretched and attractive film, characterize a group of jurors who have to decide the innocence or guiltiness of an accused murder. They are simply deliberating the destiny of a Puerto Rican teenaged boy accused of murdering his father. Initially, as the film begins, except the juror Davis (Henry Fonda), all other jurors vote guilty. Progressively, the jurors begin trying to compromise on a point that everybody agree because the decision of the jury has to be unanimous.

Read More

12 Angry Men Case Study

858 Words | 4 Pages

In a New York City, an 18-year-old male from a slum is on a trial claiming that he is responsible for his father death by stabbing him After both sides has finished their closing argument in the trial, the judge asks the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty or not The judge informs the jury decided the boy is guilty, he will face a death sentence as a result of this trial The jurors went into the private room to discuss about this case. At the first vote, all jurors vote guilty apart from Juror 8 (Henry Fonda), he was the only one who voted “Note Guilty” Juror 8 told other jurors that they should discuss about this case before they put a boy into a death sentence

Read More

More about 12 Angry Men Essay

Related Topics

Open Document