ipl-logo

12 Angry Men Summary

521 Words3 Pages

The theme of this play in the 1950s is important because it was someone's life in the hands of a jury. Meaning it was all up to 12 men that either had something else to or didn't want to be there. The play was very upbeat and responsive mainly because it was a constant argument between jours, Not knowing if their opinion mattered and the changing of minds over facts rather than an opinion. Act one started off with a guilty charge of 11:1. This was the start of an issue because most of the men in the group were saying guilty based on judgement and not knowing the facts behind the crime. Most men there had better or more important things to then be in a courtroom with one window in the middle of summer. The remaining men didn't want to be there in general. Except for juror number eight he was the only man who voted not guilty in the first round. He wasn't planning on making friends by doing that he wanted the truth and to save the kids life. …show more content…

After round one of talking the men were still stuck with a vote of 11:1 guilty. In a courtroom all jurors that attend must agree on a plea whether it be not guilty or guilty. This was very clear to juror number eight and he wanted to fight for this kid because he believed that he wasn't a murder. Very soon into the second attempt to find a plead juror number nine comes out and joins number eight on the not guilty side with some information to back it up also. Leaving round two the votes were still very close with 10:2

Show More
Related

Foreshadowing In 12 Angry Men

1419 Words | 6 Pages

First, some of these men are obviously prejudice against the defendant as he is “one of them” meaning under privileged because he grew up in a slum or possibly meaning an immigrant or even both. The others, if they are not openly prejudice they allow it to go on or don’t speak up which is just as unethical. The only time any juror defends a “minority” is when juror number six defends the elderly juror number 9 from number three. Second, with the exception of number eight, this group of men are victims of what psychologist Irving Janis termed groupthink. As Johnson described in our text, “…cohesion is the greatest obstacle faced by groups charged with making effective ethical decisions.”

Read More

Juror's Guilt In 12 Angry Men

560 Words | 3 Pages

Juror number 3 is a very angry man who wants for the boy in question to be guilty. He wants nothing more than for him to go to jail. Juror number 3 doesn't stick to the facts he made the case more personal then it should have been. He stuck to one piece of evidence and then went on that piece until everyone agreed with him. He brought up a few times how his childhood was bad and brought a picture to show everyone and guilt trip them.

Read More

Juror's Discrimination Depicted In 12 Angry Men

802 Words | 4 Pages

12 Angry Men is a film about 12 jurors arguing the conviction of a young man, charged with first degree murder. The conflict the men face causes them to rethink their opinions and values until everyone comes to an agreement that the boy is innocent. When the jurors meet in the jury room, they sit around the table and are numbered 1-12. Most of the jurors voted ‘Guilty’, but 8 jurors voted ‘Not Guilty’. When #8 was asked why he voted that way, he told them that a young man shouldn’t be sent off to die that quickly without them analyzing it.

Read More

Examples Of Prejudice In 12 Angry Men

518 Words | 3 Pages

He used his own personal bias in his argument and tried as hard as he can to get the boy convicted. Later, his “argument” was not approved by the rest of the jurors including Jurors Four and Ten, who were with Juror Three until the end and he gave up trying to argue.

Read More

Character Differences In 12 Angry Men

1133 Words | 5 Pages

Although 3 does change his mind in the end, he is the last to change so he is the leader for the guilty side. In the end, the reader can look at figure 1. and take away the fact that juror 8 is the main character, and that jurors 3 and 8 causes the main conflict in the

Read More

Change Of Perspectives In 12 Angry Men

591 Words | 3 Pages

They all were upset and confused as to why the man had voted not guilty. The man didnt exactly think that the boy was not guilty but he didnt think that he was either. He let the men know that they should atleast talk about it because they were overall talking about someones life. As the movie goes on you can see how all the men gradually changed their votes to not guilty after having conversations about tiny details that were not mentioned in the court room.

Read More

Guilty In '12 Angry Men'

471 Words | 2 Pages

They made a statement that no one wears glasses to bed. That was the statement that made all the jurors go not guilty except for juror 3. Juror 3 did not vote not guilty because he didn't did not like the boy because he killed his father and he didn't did not want to think about his son killing him. 10th Juror: “Not guilty do whatever you want”, Juror 3: “you're the worst you son of a…

Read More

Essay On Juror 8

712 Words | 3 Pages

As mentioned in the story, juror #8 was the only person with the vote not guilty. When he kept convincing them that the defendant wasn't guilty, they realized he was trying to change their mind. After that he gave up and said that he'll go with a Guilty verdict if all of the eleven remaining jurors vote Guilty again, he will change his vote to guilty, but surprisingly one vote was not guilty. As time passed by and juror #8 was giving them so much evidence that the defendant is not guilty, many off them stared having second thoughts. By the end of the jurors conversation everybody has changed their votes to not guilty.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On 12 Angry Men

549 Words | 3 Pages

This man may be a bit timid in part due to his old age, but his quiet nature also makes him insightful, noticing very specific details about witnesses that many others on the jury missed. He seems to come off as the most respectable and well mannered man out of the twelve. He 's the first to change his vote to not guilty, mostly to give Juror 8 a chance to make his case and out of respect for his motives in gambling for support. In talking about the older man that gave testimony it 's almost as though he 's talking about himself, revealing that he wants to be useful and to do something valuable, even if it 's just this once as a juror. As you may have noticed out of all the twelve men in the movie, each and everyone of them has unique personalities, that all at one point throughout the trial, played a very effective role in deciding this boy 's fate.

Read More

Examples Of Prejudice In The 12 Angry Men

621 Words | 3 Pages

It was later proven that both stories testified by the eyewitnesses were fake as they further questioned things. Juror nine proposed that the reasoning may be for the sake of being heard – tired of being overlooked and lonely as elderly people. This shows the disregard they have for the boy, putting a young life at risk for themself to be seen and heard for once. They judged and accused the boy before fulling understanding what happened that

Read More

12 Angry Men Essay

1029 Words | 5 Pages

The jury starts the trial by figuring out the boy's motive for trying to kill his father in the first place. The jury casts the first vote, and eleven jurors find the boy guilty of murder. However, the eighth juror doubts the evidence and votes the boy is not guilty of homicide, triggering a new discussion among the jurors about the old man's testimony. Even though the elderly man had sworn to tell the truth, it was later discovered that he had lied when the jury asked how, given his age and condition, he could have run to the stairs in under fifteen seconds. They discovered it would have taken at least forty-two seconds for the elderly man to run from his bedroom to the stairs after Juror 8 acted it out.

Read More

Critical Lens Essay On 12 Angry Men

229 Words | 1 Pages

Many people now a day’s get offended really easily like if a women or african American were to watch or read 12 Angry Men they would probably get upset, but the truth to the matter is you shouldn't be because every single person is different even if they do look alike. An example would be jurors eight and three they think and act very different many times throughout the story like in this quote “(shouting) ‘Shut up! (Lunges at eight, but is caught by two of the jurors and is held. He struggles has eight watches him calmly. Then screams) Let me go!

Read More

12 Angry Men Groupthink Analysis

842 Words | 4 Pages

Juror 3 was intimidating the other jurors, trying to convince them to stick with the guilty verdict. Juror 2 was guilty of self-censorship agreeing with the rest of the group to influence his decisions. The whole group began with the illusion of unanimity. According to Janis illusion of unanimity is, “the majority view and judgments are assumed to be unanimous.” (Psysr.org,

Read More

12 Angry Men Analysis

837 Words | 4 Pages

Many of the jurors were not really concerned with the seriousness of the case especially since some of the jurors had other obligations outside of the case. The judges’ posture and monotone voice that he displayed while he was giving the instructions gave the impression

Read More

12 Angry Men: Movie Analysis

827 Words | 4 Pages

Poverty and deprivation of many kinds is a very serious problem, not only in the United States, but also around the world. In a study in 2014, forty-seven million people living in the U.S. were considered to be in poverty; that is fifteen percent of its population . Poverty and deprivation is a serious topic that everyone should be aware of; if you are not aware of a problem,how are you going to fix it? You can find examples of this topic in almost every where; From books and movies to your everyday life. The most common known definition of poverty is economic poverty, but there is also social, emotional, and spiritual poverty and deprivation.

Read More

More about 12 Angry Men Summary

Open Document