ipl-logo

12 Angry Men Summary

132 Words1 Pages
Have you ever been in a situation where you and a group of individuals are trying to make a difficult decision? A decision that could alter another person 's life. Well for the jurors in “Twelve Angry Men” ,by Reginald Rose, they had to do exactly that. All twelve members of the jury had to decide whether a young man would be guilty of manslaughter. All of them were forced to stay in the room until they all agreed on a decision. They were all fighting and were persuading everybody to believe what they did. After a long time of arguing and fighting they all eventually agreed in the decision of the young man being non-guilty. This summary shows that through communication and compromise the impossible decisions suddenly become ones you can make.
Open Document