ipl-logo

12th Justice System Case Study

416 Words2 Pages

I find myself writing you asking for guidance within the walls of the 12th Justice System.
My daughter continues to be in the middle of ledge issues with the adopted mother of my granddaughter. However, this is a family matter, in which we will have to figure out on our end.
But, my concern is that my daughter (Jaclyn Renee Romeo) was given a two year order of protection by Judge Jessica Colon-Sayre for a Facebook post on a private page WITH no names in/on the post. When my daughter (Jaclyn) was in court with the adopted mother several months ago, and the previous Judge stated that the page could stay up as long as it was in a private status. I know you cannot make a comment regarding another Judge ruling, however I am asking for someone to, look into the matter on a more check and balance bases.
I am all so concern regarding Judge Jessica Colon-Sayre bias regarding the case base on a statement she allegedly made.
Apparently in her chastising of my daughter (Jaclyn), Judge Jessica Colon-Sayre supposedly made a statement regarding her personal experience and used it as a point of references in the case, (“She …show more content…

In fact the Supreme Court of Illinois established the Commission on Professionalism to promote among lawyers and judge of Illinois principles of integrity, professionalism and civility: to foster commitment to the elimination of bias and divisiveness within the legal and judicial system; and to ensure that those systems provide equitable, effective and efficient resolution of problems and disputes for the people of Illinois. (Rule 799(a). Then going out in the real world seeing it happen, first hand. All I can say is I have been an apart of this great Commission for seven year and we have a lot of work to

Show More
Related
191 Words | 1 Pages

Judge Richard Cappelli 201 W. Front St. Media, Pa. 19063 (610) 891-4042 was advised of the identity of Investigator Sean P. Brennan and of the confidential nature and purpose of the interview, Cappelli, provided the following information: Judge Cappelli was a MDJ from November 1992 until he was elected to the Common Pleas Court in May 2014. Cappelli knows Judge Vann from when he was a MDJ and they would cover for one another over the course of time. Cappelli doesn’t know Vann outside of work, he never socialized with her. Cappelli vaguely recalls the circumstances involved when Vann called him and asked him to do an arraignment for her because she had some sort of conflict.

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER In response to the first issue, Marshard explains “my file notes state I met with Mr. Sylvia to explain that the Court would appoint him an attorney to explore his 5th Amendment right and to discuss with him whether he wished to waive or assert that right.” Marshard maintains that she wanted Silvia to know he was a victim in this matter and not a defendant. She states this was important because “(1) the pending clerk’s hearing where charges were being pursued by Mr. Petersen and (2) Mr. Sylvia had often been a defendant when the court appointed him an attorney.” Marshard claims Silvia “does not always appear to accurately grasp the situation.”

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

On October 14, 2015, I went to the Arizona Superior Court at Downtown Phoenix. I went to the room 503 in the Central Court Building, which is a family court. The judge that was in the room is Paul J McMurdie. He begin hearing at 1:30 P.M. and there are a 5 hearing during the day that I visited. One of the case that he hearing is FC2010-006759, Hall vs. Gollins.

Read More
1725 Words | 7 Pages

The cases of The Town of Castle Rock v. Jessica Gonzales and Jessica Lenahan (Gonzales) v. United States of America were the result of a tragedy that could have easily been prevented. These cases bring into question: when is discretion appropriate, what is property, what rights are we guaranteed, and what can we do about it? Simon and Jessica Gonzales were married in 1990. Ms. Gonzales alleges that her husband became abusive toward her and her three daughters, Leslie, Katheryn and Rebecca, around 1996.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

MILLERSBURG — Despite a plea for leniency expressed by the victim, a Sugarcreek man was unable to overcome a long history of criminal convictions and a bond violation when a Holmes County judge on Wednesday sentenced him to prison for making unwanted phone calls and threats to several members of a family over a period of months. David Lamar Schrock, 43, of 2578 State Route 39, previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of telephone harassment and one count of menacing by stalking. In exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed to dismiss two additional counts of telephone harassment and three counts of menacing by stalking. The charges are made more serious because Schrock was convicted, in January 2016,

Read More
129 Words | 1 Pages

I believe that Danforth, the judge, is to blame. He chose to listen to the girls as a verifiable source of information. He makes the ultimate ruling on who lives or dies based on their accusations. He created more fear instead of peace within the community. He didn 't question their credibility until someone else brought that issue to light.

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

I vividly recall my mother’s astonishment that I, as a 10 year-old, would be glued to the television set. The Casey Anthony case was aired for years, I was fascinated by how the law worked and the new facts that were discovered that threw the case to one side or another; I felt connected to this case because it was in my home state. My mom never grows tired of telling this story, and with every year passing I know she becomes more and more proud of the little girl who admired the men in blue suits on the screen and decided then she wanted to be a lawyer. I remember watching my mom gaze at me with an amazed look in her eye that I have now grown so fond of.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

A frustrated community, mislead stories, and a phony mother brought to the courtroom in 2008, as a mother was being charged. Casey Anthony, the mother of Caylee, was accused of being responsible for the disappearance and death of her daughter. Caylee had been missing for weeks, before it was reported. The Casey Anthony case was significant to America because it showed our society the careless actions of one mother through the unreliable stories, falsely made reports and evidence that wasn’t thoroughly investigated. This trial was significant to America because it showed our society the careless actions of a mother, and how her choices got her to where she is today.

Read More
403 Words | 2 Pages

Tamra Judge is firing back at her former friend Vicki Gunvalson. The two fell apart two seasons ago when it was revealed that Brooks Ayers faked having cancer while appearing on the Real Housewives of Orange County. It put a rift in Judge 's friendship with Gunvalson and things took a turn for the worse last season. When the cast took a trip to Ireland, everything ended badly. The addition of Kelly Dodd added tension to the already strained friendship and Season 12 is going to show more of that.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

Nils Christie’s view on modern law is that due to specialization, victims have lost the right to participate in their trials. Lawyers are becoming too involved in cases, taking conflicts away from parties and turning them into property. Christie states there there is less attention focused on the effects on the victim and more focus on the criminal’s background. Christie also states that getting a court to function is difficult while there are specialists present. According to Christie, parties become uneasy with handling their own social conflicts where they know there are professionals present who they believe can do a better job.

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

With the finalization of my parents’ divorce came a series of custody cases. Although, my siblings and I preferred to stay with our mother, it wasn’t up to us. Waiting for the verdict in that courtroom was very petrifying. After, what felt like hours, the judge had decided. “Case summary: after carefully examining both parents, the parent fit for full custody will be Ms. Salazar,” Said the

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

She was often sick, which could have been a bigger influence. Since there are multiple influences on a person, this judge should not be able to determine if an influencer should have consequences or not. People should be responsible for their actions; however, due to an infinite amount of influences on a person’s life, not everyone should have repercussions. Likewise, only people who committed an act of murder should have consequences created by an unbiased court and not the morals of one man. Although the justice system cannot get every case completely correct, using a court builds a standardized procedure in order to obtain the most accurate results.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

The criminal justice emphasis on Client-Oriented service owes its start to Thomas J. Peters and Robert H. Waterman Jr. as in their work, In Search of Excellence, they studied 62 private sector companies that were well managed and had achieved their objectives (Cronkhite, 2013). They analyzed companies such as IBM, 3M, McDonalds and Delta Airlines (Cronkhiite, 2013). From the study emerged 8 characteristics that created excellence in each of the companies: “a bias for action; close to the customer; autonomy and entrepreneurship; productivity through people; hands-on, value driven; sticking to knitting; simple form, lean staff, and simultaneous loose/tight properties” (Cronkhite, 2013, p. 72). The excellence achieved by these companies

Read More
1391 Words | 6 Pages

Fiona Mactoggart, a British Labour politician, stated that “the government proposal to grant anonymity to rape defendant’s sends a message to juries and rape victims that the victim is not to be believed”. If this is the case, this would deter rape victims from a reporting a crime which is already grossly under-reported (it is suggested that around one in ten victims of rape do not report it to the police). The Rape Crisis charity argued that granting anonymity to defendants would “victimise victims further” . In respect of jurors, McGee conducted a study whereby she found that a staggering forty percent of the participants felt as though many rape allegations were fabricated. By granting rape defendants anonymity, it runs a risk of making

Read More
1258 Words | 6 Pages

The role of the judiciary is to interpret the law, apply the law in different situation to achieve justice. Justice which is defined in a legal sense as “a scheme or system of law in which every person receives his/ her/its due from the system, including all rights, both natural and legal.” (Legal Dictionary). Justice can be achieved through various legal processes such as; police investigations and coronial inquests. Legal principles are instrumental in achieving justice such as; the rights of the accused and victims, and equality before the court.

Read More

More about 12th Justice System Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document