Imagine living in a world where every move you make, every word you say, and every thought you have is being monitored and recorded. This may sound like a scheme from a dystopian novel, but with the rise of technology, we are getting closer and closer to the world of Big Brother from George Orwell’s book, 1984. George Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning against totalitarianism and the dangers of government control over people’s lives. The book portrays a dystopian future where the government has complete control over every aspect of people’s lives, and the protagonist, Winston Smith, rebels against the oppressive regime. The novel is a powerful critique of the dangers of authoritarianism and the importance of individual freedom. This fiction is …show more content…
The article Spyware and Surveillance: Threats to Privacy and Human Rights Growing, UN Report Warns, by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights states, “While purportedly being deployed for combating terrorism and crime, such spyware tools have often been used for illegitimate reasons, including to clamp down on critical or dissenting views and on those who express them, including journalists, opposition political figures and human rights defenders,” the report states”(UN). This quote by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights states how spyware tools, which are often deployed for combating terrorism and crime, are increasingly being used for illegitimate reasons. The report warns that such tools are being used to clamp down on critical or dissenting views and on those who express them, including journalists, opposition political figures, and human rights defenders. This is a concerning issue as it can lead to the suppression of free speech and the violation of individual privacy rights. The report emphasizes the need for greater transparency and accountability in how governments use spyware tools and the need for stronger protections for human …show more content…
Furthermore, in the article The Rise of India’s Dystopian Surveillance State, by Ghosh Aparajita states, “The Criminal Procedure Identification Bill was passed in April, which allows law enforcement agencies to collect sensitive data like retina scans, fingerprints, footprints, palm-prints, signatures, and unspecified physical and biological samples that can be stored, shared or disseminated for up to 75 years”(Ghosh Aparajita). This quote by Ghosh Aparajita highlights India’s increasing surveillance capabilities and how the Criminal Procedure Identification Bill has given law enforcement agencies the power to collect and store sensitive data for up to 75 years. This article raises concerns about how this surveillance state could be used to suppress dissent and monitor citizens’ activities. The article also highlights the potential for this data to be used for discriminatory purposes and how it could impact marginalized communities. This type of surveillance is similar to the world of 1984, where the government uses surveillance to maintain its power and control over the population. This article serves as a warning to the public about the potential dangers of unchecked surveillance and the need for greater transparency and accountability in how governments collect and use personal