ipl-logo

3 Major Environmental Worldviews

744 Words3 Pages

People all over the world have different views on the environment and how we as humans reside on the planet. Some people believe that there is no end to the resources available because we are a predominant cunning species. Others are on the complete other side of the spectrum where they believe we are just visitors here and we need to take care of this place. There are three major environmental worldviews; planetary management, stewardship, and environmental wisdom. Planetary management, which is an anthropocentric worldview, can be best described as being apart from nature. It is based on humans wants and needs and taking from the environment. This worldview believes that humans can do whatever they desire and take advantage of the earths …show more content…

This worldview believes if we take care of the earth, our resources will not expire, but we should not be wasting them. We need rules and regulations to prevent people from wasting and polluting otherwise the human race will not be successful in our future generations. The last worldview is environmental wisdom. This is the complete opposite from planetary management. This worldview believes we completely rely on the the environment and its not for only us, but for every living organism as well. It is not ours to take and abuse, but use in moderation. They believe that resources are limited and we need to discourage waste and refrain from using things that harm the environment. We need to cooperate with the earth instead of taking advantage and spoiling is precious …show more content…

I do not agree with the planetary worldview because our resources are exhaustible. We are well over carrying capacity in America and they will be depleted if we continue to abuse our resources. Oil is a good example. Oil can’t last forever, especially with the high demand of oil needed here in America. Some people say we’ve already reached peak oil and already oil is in decline. It may not run out in my lifetime, but I believe it will someday. As for being able to fix all the problems around us, oil is also ruining everything from climate change, to clean water, to air quality, and to kill animals and their ecosystems. Oil spills are devastating for our marine environments. The BP oil spill in 2010 was absolutely tragic. There were billions of barrels spilled into the ocean and the damage that was done is irreversible. There is still oil left in the ocean from that incident. No one was able to completely fix that problem. As for climate change, that’s still a huge problem and its still getting worse. We are not living sustainably. We need to use more electric cars, ride bicycles, walk, do anything to try to stop relying on oil. I appreciate the stewardship worldview but I just can’t be on board with that view only because of the shape our environment is in now. I can’t see the earth healing itself with that worldview because too much damage it already done. Also, I feel having the right management still

Show More
Related
579 Words | 3 Pages

This paper has great ethos, it gives an example of what is to come if we do not care for our environment and people. The paper states, “Once the battle is lost...man can not wonder at nature; his spirit will wither and his sustenance be wasted” (Lyndon B. Johnson).

Read More
1546 Words | 7 Pages

At what point are we going to take responsibility and protect the Earth instead of allowing it to be destroyed? The Earth can only handle a so much growth before it reaches its max sustainability. In each text, sustainability refers to how much growth the Earth can maintain without being destroyed. Wendell Berry, Jared Diamond, and Bill McKibben all use rhetoric to appeal to their audience using ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is an appeal to the audience’s ethics.

Read More
1925 Words | 8 Pages

When people think of the environment they think of many things. To some, the environment could mean nature while others may consider it to be an entire ecosystem. In the book, “The Spell of the Sensuous,” philosopher David Abram discusses how humanity needs to reconnect with the environment and that the solution is to reduce our use of technology. He believes that once we are one with the environment, we can then proceed to treat it correctly and fix our mistakes. In the book, “Animal Liberation” the author, Peter Singer, defines “speciesism” and how animals and humans should be considered equally due to the fact that they both feel pleasure and pain.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

The land ethic displays a non-anthropocentric view that is vastly far from the intrinsic value level of nature, away from the simple value that humans deem helpful. In "The Land Ethic," Leopold shifts the human-centered perspective of the world to a biocentric view; this allows there to be an emphasis on all living things. This is further explored in the "Round River" as Leopold states, "the land ethic changes the role of Homo sapiens from conqueror of the land-community to plain member and citizen of it."(Leopold 2020). This new ethical view requires humans to have a more intimate relationship with the environment and promote the responsibility of taking care of the natural world to help the health of humans and nature. Leopold highlights the importance that humans should explore a new ethical stance that points out the interdependence of all species in the

Read More
1249 Words | 5 Pages

Thich Nhat Hanh is a Zen Buddhist, talks about ecology and Buddhism in his book ‘The World We Have, A Buddhist Approach to Peace and Ecology’. Hanh criticizes the way we are consuming the resources of our mother earth and fears the survival of next generations. Mother earth is suffering from natural disasters which are more or less the results of our consumption patterns. Human beings have affected our mother earth in various ways and as a result the fear of survival has emerged. Ecological behavior is expected from each human being to survive peacefully.

Read More
297 Words | 2 Pages

Additionally, from an environmentalist view, wilderness should not be seen as a separate entity but rather one with humanity. Consequently, where one does not just go to a nature preserve to feel reconnected momentarily,

Read More
1329 Words | 6 Pages

Environmental justice in this worldview is nothing more than a fall back to fix the problems humanity has created. This profession is meant to sustain human life in a world that has been

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

The process by which one becomes an environmentalist, that is, someone who cares for nature itself, begins by seeing “the pretty” within the natural world and “it expands through successive stages of the beautiful to values as yet uncaptured by language” (Leopold, 96). John Muir recognized the importance of beauty and wrote of its presence in all places, not just the pristine, as “beauty…is made manifest in the little window-sill gardens of the poor, though perhaps only a geranium slip in a broken cup, as well as in the carefully tended rose and lily gardens of the rich” (Muir, 97). Thus, humans must connect primordially to nature so that it reveals itself and inspires “wonder and awe” within the viewer (Cooper, 343). These emotions are translated into care for the land so one who comes to love the land, they are an environmentalist. Thus, everyone can develop a land ethic, not just the elite, and the classist nature of the environmental movement is

Read More
164 Words | 1 Pages

They believe the people-first are “trying to conserve their own selfish interest,for sure,not the environment. Environmentalist also point out that the “critics” idea is conservation is “stocking

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

The earth is destroyed, filled with trash, dusty, eroded, and filled with robots compacting trash that was left behind by the humans. Just in this opening scene alone, the ideology presented speaks on how humans are on the route to destroy the Earth. Personally, I thought the director wanted to say that people are not taking care of the Earth like we are supposed to. We harvest its resources, destroy its beauty, and suck up all the beneficial aspects that the Earth offers without any remorse, only for technological advancement and then leave the newly found technology to clean up the

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

They regard the role of nature in human life by rejecting the material excesses of advancing industrialization. They adopt the ideal of a “universal brotherhood” shared by humanity, nature, and God.

Read More
1573 Words | 7 Pages

Humans have been destroying the natural world, which now causes threat to humans and every organism. Humans have lost respects of the environment in which we live in, and even the things that should be protected are not protected because humans need them. Plants and animals should be able to survive without any threat from humans, but instead because we have become greedy, we no longer respect the living things around us, forgetting that there is no other form of living life in another planet if we get rid of everything we have on earth. With the evidences that we have, since there are no other living universe expect earth, we should have intrinsic value about the things around

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Anthropocentrism is criticised based on two ways; these are the ontological and ethical senses. According to the ontological criticism, anthropocentrism is the mistake were human beings are placed at the centre of the world without realising that the Earth is a dynamic system and does take any account of how people are or how they choose to represent the form in which things are (Bhaskar, 1989). Anthropocentrism in the ethical criticism is the mistake of prioritising human interests in contrast with the interests of other living things sharing planet Earth with them (Hayward, 1997). The Earth is not an environment to be maintained in its original state or a place to be exploited, and satisfy greedy desires of economic purposes, instead it should be a place to be prepared and used for its capacity that may lead to future usefulness, hence anthropocentric acts are not justifiable because it is morally unacceptable for human population to consider themselves to be of intrinsic value both individually and as a nation (Dubos,

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

We have grown to see our parents have children, build houses, buy cars cultivate farmlands, explore timber and many other aspects. I think that this is the time to ask ourselves the question how good or bad are our actions to the environment? We should not inherit the habits of our forefathers because we are now responsible for the consequences of our action base on consequential ethics which states that it is common for us to determine our moral responsibility by weighing the consequences of our actions. According to consequentialism, correct moral conduct is determined solely by a cost-benefit analysis of an action's consequences. And in this case, if we apply sustainable development and consequential ethics, I am sure that we will protect our environment looking at it as a social

Read More
1316 Words | 6 Pages

Introduction: Our earth is the most precious gift of the universe. It is the sustenance of ‘nature’ that is the key to the development of the future of mankind. It is the duty and responsibility of each one of us to protect nature. It is here that the understanding of the ‘environment’ comes into the picture. The degradation of our environment is linked with the development process and the ignorance of people about retaining the ecological balance.

Read More

More about 3 Major Environmental Worldviews

Related Topics

Open Document